Tag: BNP Paribas

  • YET ANOTHER STRUCTURED NOTE SCAM BY OLD MUTUAL INTERNATIONAL

    Pension Life Blog - YET ANOTHER STRUCTURED NOTE SCAM BY OLD MUTUAL INTERNATIONAL - OMI - inappropriate structured productsROLL UP! ROLL UP! ME HEARTY SCAMMERS!  OMI’S LATEST STRUCTURED NOTE SCAM IS ONLY AVAILABLE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 28TH SO GET A JIGGLE ON WHILE STOCKS OF THIS TOXIC CRAP LAST!  WE ARE PROUD TO OFFER OUR VALUED SCAMMERS YET ANOTHER INVESTMENT SCAM

    BY OLD MUTUAL INTERNATIONAL.

    This wonderful investment scamming opportunity with OMI, is open to all scammers – you need no qualifications and don’t have to be regulated.  If you want a bit of training in how to sell this rubbish inappropriate structured product to as many victims as possible, we can give you a quick five-minute whisper behind the bike shed.  But, trust me, it is easypeasylemonsqueezy – just lie.  Tell the victims about the “guaranteed 10% return” bit, but don’t tell them about the “capital at risk” bit.

    Pension Life Blog - YET ANOTHER STRUCTURED NOTE SCAM BY OLD MUTUAL INTERNATIONAL - OMI - inappropriate structured productsSo, what are you waiting for?  You’ll earn 8% by selling your victims a useless OMI “PORTFOLIO” bond (don’t mention this is illegal in Spain) and then a further 8% from selling this toxic, high-risk BNP Paribas structured note (rubbish inappropriate structured product) which will tie your victims in for six years.

    This will give you plenty of time to explain away the losses as “only secondary market values” or “only paper losses”.  And by the time your victims realise what you’ve done to them, you’ll be long gone.  And most of them will commit suicide anyway, so they won’t be coming after you any time soon.

    BNP Paribas has a good reputation as being an ethical, solid company so that will certainly help you with sell these inappropriate structured products.  Just remember, tell the victims as little as possible about this product and hide the commissions you will earn – they will never find out and by the time their life savings have all gone up in smoke you will be sunning yourself on a Caribbean island, far away from the misery of those whose retirement income you will have destroyed.

    If the victims are ever organised enough to band together and form a group action, I’ll just promise to pay redress for their losses, organise a meeting and then cancel it at the last minute.  That ought to buy you enough time to make your getaway.

    Happy scamming – smiley face.  Love from Pete

    p.s. BTW, don’t worry about the email below the Mad Woman of Spain has sent out – most of the new victims will never have heard of her and by the time they do, it will be too late.  You’ve only got until 28th September to scam as many suckers as possible, so don’t just stand there – SCAM AWAY ME HEARTIES!

    p.p.s. Don’t worry about my quote about inappropriate structured products – I was just lying (something I’m pretty good at).  With the announcement of new regulations in Malta for QROPS, International Adviser has quoted managing director of OMI (soon to be Quilter) Peter Kenny: “Old Mutual International is encouraging all market participants to help rid the industry of inappropriate structured products”

    ———————————————————————————————————————————————————-

    ATTENTION PAUL EVANS – Head of Region – Middle East & Africa
    Old Mutual International (International Structured Scam Specialists)

    intmarketing@engage.omwealth.com

    1st September 2018

    Paul, are you completely mad?  OMI has been offering and buying inappropriate structured products for years and facilitating financial crime by scammers such as Continental Wealth Management.  OMI bought £94 million worth of fraudulent notes by Leonteq – which paid the scammers an extra 2% in commission.  So you must have been accepting business and investment instructions from other scammers besides CWM for at least six years between 2012 and 2016 – as well as for years prior to and subsequent to this period.

    And now you are offering more structured notes so scammers can line their pockets and ruin more victims?  Read your own marketing material Mate:

    “An autocall product with a six-year term paying at least 10% a year in USD or at least 7% a year in GBP. This is a capital at risk product.”

    You are a pathetic and revolting human being.  Which bit of CAPITAL AT RISK don’t you understand??  OMI has already disgraced itself by offering, buying and selling these totally inappropriate structured products – scam products -, and caused millions of pounds’ worth of destruction to innocent victims’ life savings.

    You, Peter Kenny, Steve Braudo and Paul Feeney are all as bad as each other – and none of you should be working in financial services.  Your conduct is utterly sickening: you are now proposing to ruin more lives and you still haven’t paid compensation for the lives you have destroyed already.

    How much commission are you paying the scammers on these toxic products?  6%?  8%?  10%?

    Instead of behaving with decency and dignity and honouring Old Mutual International’s promise to pay redress for OMI’s past failures, you are now preparing to launch a whole new tranche of financial crime and inappropriate structured products.

    You are all disgusting and this needs to be exposed and all of you outed for the evil scum you are.

    Angie

    From: Paul Evans – Old Mutual International <intmarketing@engage.omwealth.com>
    Subject: Competitive, transparent, simple – new tranche of structured products

  • SEB LIFE (OR DEATH) – WILL THE CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND BRING THEM TO JUSTICE?

    SEB LIFE (OR DEATH) – WILL THE CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND BRING THEM TO JUSTICE?

    Pension Life Blog - SEB Life - SEB life internationalOne of the hundreds of Continental Wealth Management victims stuck in a useless and expensive SEB Life International bond, and ruined by crippling investment losses, has made a detailed complaint to SEB.

    Some idiot from SEB called Orla Golden has replied – and the response is astonishing.  Below are my answers to this ridiculous rebuttal.  The complaint will now be referred to the Central Bank of Ireland – asking that SEB Life should be suspended.  I will also copy this in to the Financial Services Ombudsman.

    Let us see whether the regulator and ombudsman in Ireland will turn out to be as useless as the regulator in Gibraltar, or will actually have some teeth.  If the authorities in Ireland are any good, hopefully they will hold Conor McCarthy and Peder Nateus fully responsible for facilitating this deplorable scam.

    LETTER FROM ORLA GOLDEN TO THE CWM/SEB VICTIM IN RESPONSE TO HIS COMPLAINT (WITH MY COMMENTS IN BOLD):

    We are writing to you in response to your recently submitted complaint in respect of your insurance policy with SEB Life International Assurance Company DAC that you placed through your appointed independent financial advisor, Inter-Alliance WorldNet Insurance Agents and Advisors Ltd.

    The victims did not place any orders or instructions through Inter-Alliance.  SEB is being not only disingenuous but dishonest here.  The advisor in question was Continental Wealth Trust SL, trading as Continental Wealth Management SL (CWM) in Alicante Province, Spain.  CWM was a firm full of unqualified so-called “advisers” with a track record of scamming, cold-calling and flogging dodgy products to unsuspecting victims.  The victims appointed CWM as their advisers, and all the dealing instructions for the toxic structured notes came from CWM and not Inter-Alliance.

    SEB Life is a designated activity company which is registered under company number 218391 with the Irish Companies Registration Office and is authorised as a life insurance undertaking by the Central Bank of Ireland under number C771. 

    So, let’s see just how good a regulator the Central Bank of Ireland really is.  We must all hope it is not as hopeless, limp and corrupt as some of the other regulators.

    Pension Life Blog - SEB Life´s Complaint - SEB Life insurance Wrappers like rubbishSEB Life is permitted to distribute life insurance policies in Europe (EU) by way of a freedom of services passport issued by the Central Bank of Ireland under the Solvency II Directive 2009/138/EC as adopted into Irish law by the European Communities (Insurance and Reinsurance) Regulations 2015 (the “Solvency II Irish Regulations”).  That may be true, but these weren’t true life insurance policies: they were bogus policies designed to act as “wrappers” for dodgy, rubbish investments and to facilitate financial crime in multiple European jurisdictions – most notably Spain where such insurance/investment products have been outlawed by the Spanish Supreme Court.

    In January 2015, Inter-Alliance novated its business to Trafalgar International GmbH who became your financial advisor.  

    Not true.  Trafalgar International did not become the financial adviser.  Few, if any, of the victims had ever heard of Trafalgar until CWM collapsed in September 2017.

    Trafalgar is an independent financial advisor located in Germany

    No it isn’t – it is located in Cyprus.  Orla Golden clearly has never done Geography.

    and is authorised and entered into the register of insurance intermediaries maintained by the Chamber of Industry and Commerce (DIHK).  Trafalgar is authorised to mediate insurance policies in various EU territories including UK, Spain, Malta and France.  Yes, Trafalgar was.  But CWM wasn’t.

    SEB Life has terms of business with Trafalgar, and previously had terms of business with Inter-Alliance which was authorised by the Insurance Companies Control Service in Cyprus to mediate insurance policies in the EU; before it transferred to Trafalgar.  Continental Wealth Management (CWM) was a sub agent of Inter-Alliance

    Really?  Sub agents are illegal in Spain

    and then continued to be a sub-agent of Trafalgar. 

    No it did not.  SEB is lying.  CWM was never a sub agent of Trafalgar

    Pension Life Blog - SEB Life´s Complaint - SEB life - SEB keep changing their storyCWM is the responsibility of Trafalgar and SEB Life does not have terms of business with them. 

    So why did SEB accept dealing instructions from CWM if they had no terms of business with the firm? 

    SEB Life regularly reviews the authorisation of independent financial advisors with whom they have terms of business,

    SEB is failing to get its story straight.  CWM was not authorised – ever, for anything.  SEB may have had terms of business with both Inter-Alliance and Trafalgar, but CWM was never an authorised agent of either firm.

    however, it is the independent advisor’s responsibility to comply with their own regulatory obligations for authorisation

    And nothing to do with SEB?  So, why did SEB accept dealing instructions from CWM? 

    and their regulatory authorities have oversight responsibilities. 

    Like the Central Bank of Ireland has oversight responsibilities over SEB?  Let’s see how seriously it takes those responsibilities.

    Trafalgar, as the appointed independent financial advisor is your agent. 

    No it isn’t, and wasn’t.  Trafalgar was not an IFA firm, it was a network. 

    Any policy related intermediary commission was paid directly to Trafalgar (formerly Inter-Alliance), with whom SEB Life has terms of business.

    So why was SEB paying intermediary commission at all to CWM which was not regulated at all for anything – not pet insurance, not bicycle insurance, nothing.  It matters not to whom the commission was paid, the products were sold by an unregulated firm (CWM) and SEB should never have accepted the business – let alone ever paid commission (irrespective of to whom this commission was paid).

    As your agent, Trafalgar must handle your complaint in accordance with their agent and regulatory responsibilities. 

    Trafalgar was never the victims’ agent.

    In addition, the pre-sales advising process occurs between you as the policyholder and your appointed agent.

    Trafalgar was never the appointed agent.  Trafalgar did not provide the advice; Trafalgar did not place the dealing instructions; Trafalgar did not meet the clients.

    This process identifies the customer’s needs, based on the information provided by the policyholder(s)

    How would SEB know?  Did they ever check the fact finds or make any attempt to ascertain the victims’ attitude to risk?  No, of course they didn’t

    Pension Life Blog - SEB Life´s Complaint - plummeting toxic structured notes

    and recommends the insurance product which best suits the customer’s objectives and needs. 

    This is a ludicrous comment to make.  Not one single victim needed a bogus life assurance product – they were all, 100% mis-sold purely for the fat commissions paid by SEB. 

    SEB Life is not party to this pre-sales advising process and the discussions that occur between a policyholder and their appointed independent financial adviser as to their risk profile and the assets that will fulfill the investment needs and objectives.

    Correct.  But SEB ought to have noticed, over a period of several consecutive years, the inexorable losses from the toxic structured notes which repeatedly failed – and the dealing instructions for which (submitted by CWM and accepted by SEB) bore forged client signatures.  SEB may not have been party to the pre-scamming advice con, but they should certainly have taken action when the results of this clear fraud started to become obvious.

    SEB Life does not offer any investment advice, and this is clearly stated in the declaration section of the application form that we ensure is signed by the customer. 

    And damn good job too.  Most victims would probably trust a convicted thief rather than SEB.  The declaration section of the application form may make it clear that SEB does not offer investment advice, but the annual statements also make it clear that SEB can do maths.  And that basic maths demonstrated that hundreds of policyholders’ funds were being routinely destroyed.

    Our literature states that the amounts invested in the Units of the Fund in the contract are not guaranteed but are subject to fluctuations in value depending, in particular, on the performance of financial markets. 

    There is fluctuation, and then there is total destruction.  Fluctuation goes up and down.  Destruction just goes down.  Did not a single half-wit at SEB notice the difference over a period of seven years?

    The return on investment is not in SEB Life’s control and past performance is not an indicator of the future performance of any asset. 

    So, if Bloodstone Building in Dublin caught fire, would the blind, deaf and dumb idiots at SEB just sit there, shrug their shoulders and say “a fire in the building is not within our control – we aren’t firefighters.  And we won’t even bother using the fire extinguishers or calling the fire brigade.  We’ll just sit here and watch the building get destroyed and burn to death ourselves?”Pension Life Blog - SEB Life´s Complaint -

    SEB also request that a one-page “Statement of Understanding” is signed by a policyholder where an investment request is received in relation to a non-standard asset.

    Really?  Who told Orla Golden that?  The Statement of Understanding Fairy?  This simply is not true.

    Pension Life Blog - SEB Life´s Complaint -This is to confirm that the policyholder has read and understood the potential financial, market and liquidity risks associated with the asset before proceeding. 

    None of the victims understood the assets which SEB was permitting the scammers at CWM to churn; none of the victims realised or understood what structured notes; none of the victims knew that structured notes were for professional investors only and not for retail investors; none of the victims knew that they stood to lose part or all of their investment (as most did); none of the victims realised that SEB would just sit there and let the repeated losses keep happening as the unlicensed, unqualified scammers at CWM kept scamming away for seven years.

    Policyholders are able to request that their policy be linked to assets that are within the company’s permissible asset list.  The investments have been executed by SEB Life on the basis of written instructions submitted to SEB Life that were signed by you as the policyholder

    No they weren’t – the signatures were forged

    or your appointed investment advisor. 

    Meaning the unqualified, unlicensed scammers at CWM who did not have an investment license – let alone an insurance license.

    SEB Life relief upon and implemented those instructions in good faith and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the policy. 

    There was nothing good about SEB’s “faith”.  This particular victim – whose complaint has not been upheld by SEB – suffered the following losses between 2009 and 2015:

    12 toxic, professional-investor-only structured notes from Nomura, RBC, Commerzbank, Leonteq and BNP Paribas:

    Lost a total of 271,539 EUR

    Investment in the Quadris Teak UCIS fund:

    Lost 100,000 GBP

    TOTAL LOSS IN SIX YEARS: 371,539 EUR

    Didn’t SEB notice?  Didn’t SEB care?  Didn’t SEB do anything for seven years? 

    The answer, of course, is a resounding no.  The lazy, callous, greedy, negligent did nothing except sit there and watch this victim’s life savings be destroyed by the scammers.

    With regard to your allegations of regulatory breaches and fraud committed on your policy, SEB Life is unable to comment on such allegations and these must be discussed with your appointed financial advisor Trafalgar directly. 

    I have no doubt that SEB’s lawyers will have advised them to keep their mouths shut on this one and to try to deflect the blame onto Trafalgar.  This is one of the things I hate about lawyers – even when they know their dirty clients are guilty they will still defend them to the hilt.  As long as they keep billing, the lawyers won’t care how many lives their negligent and culpable clients ruin.

    In these circumstances, you may wish to seek independent financial advice

    I wonder what sort of “adviser” SEB have in mind?  Scammers like CWM?

    and/or legal advice regarding your engagements with your appointed financial adviser. 

    And I wonder what sort of law firm SEB would recommend?  A dodgy firm like SEB’s own lawyers who are happy to make money out of defending the indefensible?

  • OMI? OMG!  SAME OLD, SAME OLD MUTUAL – SAME OLD LIES

    OMI? OMG! SAME OLD, SAME OLD MUTUAL – SAME OLD LIES

    OMI HEAVY LOSSES Old Mutual international investors are at a loss
                                        

    Old Mutual International (OMI) is at the heart of much of what is wrong with offshore financial services.  The CWM debacle clearly evidences this.

    OMI, formerly Skandia and soon to be Quilter, provided the vehicle used to wipe out thousands of victims’ life savings – not only in the CWM scam, but also with many other rogue financial advisers (often referred to by the Spanish regulator as “chiringuitos”).

    OMI (Old Mutual International) is used as a bogus life assurance policy to “wrap” dodgy investments which subsequently nose dive and destroy portfolios.

    The so-called “life wrapper” serves absolutely no purpose from the investors’ point of view, other than to pay exorbitant fees to OMI and the adviser (which is often not licensed to provide either insurance or investment advice).  These fees, of course, mean that the victims’ pensions and investments never have a hope in hell of growing – or even maintaining their original value.

    High-risk, illiquid, professional-investor-only structured notes bought with the victims’ retirement savings by rogue advisers (such as Continental Wealth Management – CWM) frequently fail – and sometimes are even fraudulent – so bring victims’ funds crashing down even further.  In the case of the CWM debacle, the structured notes were mostly Commerzbank, Nomura, RBC and Leonteq, and many of the notes crashed – costing the victims millions of pounds.

    OMI charged the victims the following fees:

    • Regular Management Charge 1.15% for ten (yes – TEN!) years
    • Admin Charge Eur 144.00 annually
    • Early Surrender Charge 11.5% – reducing by 1.15% a year to nil after ten years

    But did OMI do any actual “management”?  No.  They never monitored the losses, alerted the investors or offered to do anything to help stem the hemorrhaging of victims’ funds.  OMI just sat there like a lazy, greedy, callous parasite and watched the victims’ retirement savings dwindle.  OMI must have known that this would be condemning thousands of people to poverty in retirement and yet they obviously did not care two hoots.

    Did they do any actual “admin”?  Yes.  They reported the losses and ever-shrinking funds.  But they took no action to help the thousands of victims or prevent further losses.

    Was it reasonable to tie victims into a useless, pointless insurance bond for ten years?  After all, the bond clearly offered no protection or guarantee of the capital invested.  And was it right to charge 11.5% for the privilege of losing huge proportions of the funds?  No, absolutely not.  In law, a pension scheme member has a right to transfer and needs the flexibility to alter their pension arrangements whenever they need to.  Being tied into a useless and expensive insurance bond FOR TEN YEARS is the last thing a retirement saver needs.

    In the wake of this appalling tragedy, what has OMI done to put things right?

    Has OMI offered to pay compensation to the victims?

    NOPE

    Has OMI offered to rebate its (extortionate) charges?

    NOPE

    Has OMI offered to waive the punitive exit fees for those who want to try to rescue what’s left?

    NOPE

    Has OMI lowered the 25% barrier so that ruined and desperate victims can access some income to avoid starving to death?

    NOPE

    Has OMI learned anything whatsoever from the CWM debacle?  Has it turned over a new leaf and stopped accepting business from unlicensed scammers such as CWM?  Has it stopped making exorbitant charges which drag retirement savings down?  Has it stopped paying huge commissions to scammers to encourage them to destroy thousands of victims life savings?  Has it stopped allowing and promoting toxic structured notes?

    The answer to all of the above is a resounding NO.  OMI knew exactly what terrible fate it was condemning the victims to for the past seven years.

    OMI knew that the victims could face losing significant parts of their retirement savings – and stood by while it happened.  Well, not exactly just stood by – they made huge profits in the process.

    Has OMI learned anything from this tragedy?  Has it turned over a new leaf?  Absolutely not.  In November 2017, it was still offering – and even aggressively pushing – structured notes to financial advisers and offering meaty commissions – obviously trying to replicate the huge success it made out of the Continental Wealth Management scam.  On 30th November 2017, OMI sent out a bulk email to advisers:

    IFA OMI BNP advertisement, pension life questions promises, possible huge losses, pension scamsFrom: Old Mutual International mail: intmarketing@engage.omwealth.com]

    Dear Greedy Broker,  HURRY HURRY HURRY!  SPECIAL OFFER ON STRUCTURED NOTES TO FLOG TO UNSUSPECTING VICTIMS.  GET YOUR RUNNING SHOES ON – THIS OFFER CLOSES 15TH DECEMBER 2017.  WE NEED MORE UNSUSPECTING MUGS LIKE THE CWM VICTIMS SO WE CAN MAKE MORE HUGE PROFITS AND CONDEMN MORE PEOPLE TO POVERTY IN RETIREMENT.

    “The latest, tranche of structured products provided by BNP Paribas is available now through our portfolio bonds.  But you don’t have long to get business in – this tranche will now close on 15th December 2017.

    The products on offer during this tranche are:

    Global Equity Income 5 – with a five year term paying quarterly income of 6% a year in USD or 5% a year in GBP – capital at risk product

    Global Equity Autocall 9 – autocall product with a six year term paying 10% a year in USD or 8.25% a year in GBP – capital at risk product

    Multi-Asset Diversified Global Certificate 10 – with a five year term and 100% capital protection

    Full details, including how to access the products, are on our dedicated structured products page.”

    Notes pay initial commission of 5.88% to Old Mutual of which 4.69% is paid to the adviser. OMI pockets 1.19%. No wonder OMI are pushing this!

    The BNP Paribas “handbook” spouts the same old same old rubbish that CWM was using to con around 1,000 victims out of their retirement savings between 2011 and 2017:

    “Structured Products are investments that are fully
    customised to meet specific objectives such as capital
    protection, diversification, yield enhancement, leverage,
    regular income, tax/regulation optimisation and
    access to non-traditional asset classes, amongst others.
    The strength of a Structured Product lies in its
    flexibility and tailored investment approach.
    In their simplest form, Structured Products offer
    investors full or partial capital protection coupled
    with an equity-linked performance and a variable
    degree of leverage. They are commonly used as a
    portfolio enhancement tool to increase returns
    while limiting the risk of loss of capital.”

    The hundreds of CWM victims know that this is all lies: with structured notes, there is no capital protection; no flexibility; no portfolio enhancement; no increased returns and no limit to the risk of loss of capital.  Shame on BNP Paribas for helping OMI to dupe more victims into losing their retirement savings and facing financial ruin.

    So, the message to the public is:

    DON’T TOUCH OMI – OLD MUTUAL INTERNATIONAL – WITH A BARGEPOLE

    DON’T TOUCH STRUCTURED NOTES IN GENERAL WITH A BARGEPOLE

    DON’T TOUCH STRUCTURED NOTES BY BNP PARIBAS WITH A BARGEPOLE

    DON’T BELIEVE THE LIES TOLD BY ROGUE FINANCIAL ADVISERS, OMI OR BNP PARIBAS

    DON’T BECOME ANOTHER VICTIM OF THE INSURANCE BOND/STRUCTURED NOTE SCAM

    Lastly, OMI’s self-congratulating rubbish on their website crows about their “customer principles” and the many awards they have won.  An example of this is the following statement:

    Giving good service to financial advisers and their clients is at the heart of our business. We work hard to constantly improve our standards in this area.  Our track record speaks for itself.

    And yes, OMI’s track record does speak for itself – and anyone who does even the most basic maths will inevitably say “Oh My God!”.

    And BNP Paribas’ claim that “a Structured Product lies” sums it all up nicely.