Tag: Andrew Warwick-Thompson

  • Pensions Regulator – Light Speed with Gleeson Bessent Trustees

    Pensions Regulator – Light Speed with Gleeson Bessent Trustees

    TPR launches first fraud prosecution

    I am not often left speechless, but in this case all I can say is:

    WOW!

    The Pensions Regulator announced on 11th December 2018 that it is to launch its first fraud case – against Roger Bessent of Gleeson Bessent Trustees in the matter of the Focusplay Retirement Benefit Scheme.

    The details are below, as reported by James Glover, Senior Media Officer of the Pensions Regulator.

    But I am puzzled – I met with tPR’s Andrew Warwick Thompson nearly four years ago.  We discussed various pension scams and fraudsters who were active at the time.  And the delightful Mr. WT told me to buzz off and wind my neck in.  He said that he and his lawyers – who sat either side of him (presumably to keep him from toppling over) had it all under control.  And they didn’t need any help.  Especially from me, thank you.

    At this meeting, we mainly discussed the Capita Oak pension scam – run by XXXX XXXX and administered by Stephen Ward.  And we also talked about the other scams run by the XXXX/Ward dream team at the same time: Westminster and Regent.  The trustee for Westminster was Thames Trustees.  And Roger Bessent was the director of Thames Trustee – and he took over from ME!

    The background to this was that XXXX XXXX had appointed a lady in Dubai, Maria Orolfo of Europe Emirates Group – run by Adrian Oton – as director of two trustee firms: Imperial Trustees and Thames Trustees.  These were the trustees for the Capita Oak and Westminster scams respectively.  Orolfo had realised with horror she was the trustee for these scams and resigned – leaving the pension scheme members exposed to the danger of unauthorised payment charges if there was no trustee.

    So I became a director of both companies – Imperial and Thames.  I was removed pretty quickly by the scammers to prevent me from obtaining evidence against them.  I was replaced by a butcher called Roger Chant in Imperial, and an accountant called Roger Bessant in Thames.  Hard to say which of them was worse, to be honest.

    Anyway, the Serious Fraud Office did – eventually – wake up and start to investigate XXXX XXXX and both schemes: Capita Oak and Westminster.  This was announced in May 2017.  And now, more than 18 months later, tPR announces it is going to investigate Roger Bessent.

    I am very glad that Tinky Winky and tPR don’t do much rushing around – the last thing we want to see is a load of dizzy Teletubbies!  I just hope the trail hasn’t gone too cold in the past four years.

    Issued: Tuesday 11 December 2018

    An accountant is to appear in court charged with fraud and making employer-related investments – the first time The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has prosecuted for these offences.Roger Bessent is accused of abusing his position as the director of Gleeson Bessent Trustees Ltd, a professional pension scheme trustee, to transfer more than £200,000 of pension scheme funds into his bank account and those of companies controlled by him.The funds were transferred from the Focusplay Retirement Benefit Scheme, the sponsoring employer of which was Gleeson Bessent (Accountants and Business Advisers) Ltd where Mr Bessent was a director.Mr Bessent, 66, whose business is based at Navigation Business Village, Navigation Way, Ashton on Ribble, Preston, Lancashire, faces five counts of fraud by abuse of position and five counts of making employer related investments.He has been summonsed to appear at Preston Magistrates’ Court on 30 January 2019.

     

    Editors’ notes

    1. Fraud by abuse of position is an offence under Section 1(2)(c) of the Fraud Act 2006. It carries a maximum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment.
    2. Making a prohibited employer-related investment is an offence under Section 40(5) of the Pensions Act 1995. It carries a maximum sentence of two years’ imprisonment.
    3. TPR is the regulator of work-based pension schemes in the UK. Our statutory objectives are: to protect members’ benefits; to reduce the risk of calls on the Pension Protection Fund (PPF); to promote, and to improve understanding of, the good administration of work-based pension schemes; to maximise employer compliance with automatic enrolment duties; and to minimise any adverse impact on the sustainable growth of an employer (in relation to the exercise of TPR’s functions under Part 3 of the Pensions Act 2004 only).
     
  • Trustees Must Block Transfers to Pension Scams

    Trustees Must Block Transfers to Pension Scams

    Pension Life Blog - Trustees Must Block Transfers to Pension Scams - ceding pension trustees - Trustees have the power to block pension transfers if they suspect a scam – they must use it!  Now the Ombudsman has upheld a complaint against the Police trustee, there is hope for further justice against negligent pension trustees.

    In the Royal London v Hughes case, Royal London suspected an attempted transfer was destined to go into a scam and blocked it.  The member, Ms Hughes, complained to the Pensions Ombudsman – but he did not uphold her complaint.  He said that Royal London was quite right to block the transfer.  But Ms Hughes appealed the matter to the High Court and the judge overturned the Ombudsman’s determination.

    The industry was, naturally, appalled.  But this matter left many questions unanswered:

    • Why was a singing teacher so desperate to transfer her £8,000 pension and have it invested in Cape Verde property? (Had she developed a passion for collapsible flats?)
    • Where did she get the many thousands of pounds it must have cost her to have a barrister represent her in the High Court?  (Considerably more than eight thousand quid I reckon).
    • How come the mighty Fenner Moeran QC (for Royal London) got so soundly defeated by a public access barrister?  (Was his sharp stick a bit blunt that day?)
    • What happened to the several hundred people queuing up behind Ms Hughes to have their pensions invested in Cape Verde flats?  (“Flat” being the operative word).

    I could ask loads more pertinent and searching questions – like why did Ms Hughes’ public access barrister, Frances Ratcliffe of Radcliffe Chambers, think it was a good use of her considerable skills to defend an obvious pension scam?  How drunk was the judge on the day?  How many more people got scammed out of their pensions because of this abomination – and proof the law is not just an ass but a whole donkey farm?

    Anyway, enough already.  The damage was done in the Royal London v Hughes case.  And now, hopefully, the door to justice has been opened in the Police Authority v Mr N case – as eloquently reported by Henry Tapper in his blog on 2.8.18.  But there is a great deal more work to be done on this now: the scammers who organised and promoted the London Quantum scam need to be prosecuted and jailed; and the FCA-regulated firm – Gerard Associates – which gave the advice to the police officer (Mr N) needs to be sanctioned by the FCA.  Gerard Associates – run by Stephen Ward’s associate Gary Barlow – also needs to refund the £5k they charged Mr N – and indeed all of the £220k they charged the 98 London Quantum victims.

    Now is the time to bring to justice not only the pension scammers, but also the negligent ceding pension trustees who allowed the scammers to succeed – and facilitated financial crime.

    At the time Mr N was scammed by Stephen Ward; Viva Costa International (the “introducers”); and FCA-regulated advisers Gerard Associates, the Pensions Regulator’s “Scorpion” campaign was in full flow.  But it was unbelievably inept.  It only really talked about liberation and ignored the many other kinds of fraud being perpetrated at the time – i.e. investment fraud.

    The London Quantum pension scam came hard on the heels of the Capita Oak and Henley scams – which straddled the Scorpion watershed of February 2013.  The transfer administration for Capita Oak was done by Stephen Ward of Premier Pension Solutions (Spain) and Premier Pension Transfers (Worsley, Manchester).  Ward knew from first-hand experience how ceding trustees were starting – albeit agonisingly slowly and gradually – to resist transfer requests.

    Here is evidence of the first tentative – and very inconsistent – moves to do some long-overdue diligence on pension transfer requests – as reported by Stephen Ward’s team of transfer administration scammers:

    24.4.2013 – ReAssure Pensions – “The scheme now want the client’s application and new-dated screenshot emailed to Alan (Fowler – Ward’s pension lawyer chum) – on hold at Tom’s (Biggar – XXXX XXXX’s mate) request”.

    11.4.2013 – Prudential – “Transfer canceled as per XXXX (XXXX XXXX’s wife)”

    26.4.2013 – Zurich – “Unwilling to process – not sure why – need to cancel”

    11.7.2013 – Zurich – “On hold as there may be an issue with Scorpion”

    26.4.2013 – Friends Life – “Awaiting trust scheme rules – with Anthony (Salih – Ward’s mate) – need to cancel”

    30.5.2013 – Aviva, NHS, Co-op, Friends Life – “Schemes are refusing to transfer”

    11.6.2013 – Scottish Life – “Scheme contacting client – believed not transferring”

    However, during this same period, there were plenty of transfers being made in defiance or ignorance of Scorpion.  These included ceding schemes NHS (£43k), Scottish Widows (£25k), LGPS Newham (£47k), Aviva (£54k), Xerox £92k, Zurich (£21k), Prudential (£25k) and Standard Life (£53k).

    But the most worrying was the Firefighters Pension Scheme: £69K after the following notes were made:

    “Advised that the trustees committee are meeting to discuss cases and we are awaiting a call back next week.  Transfer sent today 2.7.13 and paid on 16.8.13.  Statement sent to XXXX  and Tom (Biggar)”. 

    So the Firefighters were no better than the Police Authority in terms of ignoring the Scorpion warning.

    And here is what the Scorpion warning was saying from 2013 onwards – and, indeed, was still saying in 2016 when the last couple of hundred Continental Wealth Management victims were in the process of being scammed:

    Pension Life Blog - Trustees Must Block Transfers to Pension Scams - ceding pension trustees - Predators Stalk Your Pension

    Companies are singling out savers like you and claiming that they can help you cash in your pension early.  If you agree to this you could face a tax bill of more than half your pension savings.

    Don’t let your pension become prey.

    Pension loans or cash incentives are being used alongside misleading information to entice savers as the number of pension scams increases.  This activity is known as ‘pension liberation fraud’ and it’s on the increase in the UK.

    In rare cases – such as terminal illness – it is possible to access funds before age 55 from your current pension scheme.  But for the majority, promises of early cash will be bogus and are likely to result in serious tax consequences.

    What to watch out for?

    1. Being approached out of the blue, over the phone or via text message
    2. Pushy advisers or ‘introducers’ who offer upfront cash incentives
    3. Companies that offer a ‘loan’, ‘savings advance’ or cash back’ from your pension
    4. Not being informed about the potential tax consequences

    Five steps to avoid becoming a victim

    1. Never give out financial or personal information to a cold caller
    2. Find out about the company’s background through information online. Any financial advisers should be registered with the FCA
    3. Ask for a statement showing how your pension will be paid at retirement and question who will look after your money until then
    4. Speak to an adviser that is not associated with the proposal you’ve received, for unbiased advice
    5. Never be rushed into agreeing to a pension transfer

    If you think you may have been made an offer, contact Action Fraud.

    But, the Scorpion warning failed tragically in so many different ways:

    • The warning only talked about liberation.  Many victims thought this warning didn’t apply to them as they had no intention of liberating their pension fund
    • No information was given on how to find out about a company’s background – and how to establish whether it was regulated
    • The warning talked about advisers being FCA regulated – but ignored the question of offshore advisers who obviously wouldn’t be FCA regulated
    • The public was advised to contact Action Fraud – but did not disclose that Action Fraud would do absolutely nothing

    Pension Life Blog - Trustees Must Block Transfers to Pension Scams - ceding pension trustees - In 2015, we went to see the Pensions Regulator to talk about the failings of the Scorpion campaign – as well as the failings of the Regulator.  Two Ark victims and I met the then Executive Director for Regulatory Policy – Tinky Winky.  Our intention was to explain to him how the Scorpion campaign had failed and how it needed to be made more robust and comprehensive.

    Tinky Winky, flanked by two lawyers and a paralegal, told us to “hop it” – and warned us that if we tried to interfere with the authority of the powers of the regulator, our arse would be grass and he’d be a lawnmower.  A year later the Scorpion warning had still not been updated or improved and hundreds more victims lost their life savings.

    The Pensions Ombudsman is, naturally, the hero of the hour in the Mr N v Police Authority case.  And hopefully, he will find for the rest of the victims if they all now bring complaints against their negligent ceding trustees in the London Quantum case.  But we must remember that, contrary to what the Ombudsman’s service has said for the past few years, the industry did know about pension scams long before the Scorpion Campaign in February 2013.

    In fact, a clear warning had been given in 2010.  The Pensions Regulator had been fully aware that since 1999 pension scams were on the increase, and yet did not make it clear to ceding pension trustees what their statutory obligations were in respect of transferring victims into scams. On 13.7.2010, tPR Chair David Norgrove stated that: “Any administrator who simply ticks a box and allows the transfer, post July 2010, is failing in their duty as a trustee and as such are liable to compensate the beneficiary.” 

    But pension trustees claim they never read that message (let alone heeded it) and that it was neither publicised nor distributed.  Further, in the same year Tony King, the Pensions Ombudsman, reported that he had “found that pension trustees failed in carrying out serious fiduciary responsibilities to others in circumstances in which the law specifically states that they should not be protected from liability.”  And still tPR did nothing.  And the Pension Schemes Act 1993 was not amended to reflect the urgent need to protect the public.

    The Pensions Regulator’s predecessor – OPRA (Occupational Pensions Regulatory Authority) had warned about the dangers of pension scams years before 2013 – as had HMRC.  The last thing I want to do is criticise the Ombudsman – as this must be his hour of glory and we must all be hugely grateful to him.  Especially Mr N and his fellow London Quantum victims.  But we must remember that the industry in general, and pension trustees in particular, should have been alert to pension scams long before Scorpion.

    Now is the time to bring to justice not only the pension scammers, but also the negligent ceding pension trustees who allowed the scammers to succeed – and facilitated financial crime.

     

     

     

     

  • LGPS: SEE YOU LATER REGULATOR – IN A WHILE REPTILE

    In a while, Tinky Winky will be at LGPS

    “In some cultures, referring to someone as a “crocodile” is the worst insult one can inflict on his/her self-respect.”

    Let us dispel some myths once and for all.  Crocodiles are marvelous creatures, efficient hunting machines and dutiful, loving parents. They also make rather stylish handbags.  Ditto alligators.  And snakes.

    When the Pensions Regulator published their pension scam warning campaign in February 2013 (some 15 years after they first realised this was a huge problem and posed the risk of ruining thousands of innocent lives), they chose the scorpion as the mascot.

    Interestingly, the scorpion is closely related to spiders, mites and ticks, and is especially good at surviving in harsh conditions.  But, even more interestingly, it uses its sting only to survive – not to amass a vast hoard of food/prey.  When I launched my first pension-scam warning campaign – entitled “Ward Off Vultures” (unashamedly aimed at Stephen Ward of Premier Pension Solutions who scammed thousands of victims out of their pensions from 2010 on wards) – I overlooked the fact that vultures perform a very environmentally-friendly function by keeping the countryside clear of dead bodies.

    So what animal would we use to represent the pension scammers?  I’ve thought of the fox, but that could embroil us in a whole off-topic argument about fox hunting.  It has always amazed me that so many anti-hunting campaigners are intensely passionate about fox hunting but never once mention the persecution of rats, slugs, moles, wasps and battery hens.

    I found an excellent site which lists the top ten most dangerous animals in the world: box jellyfish; cone snail; black mamba; cape buffalo; siafu ant; deathstalker scorpion; puffer fish; hyena; stone fish; human.  Ignoring the bleeding obvious (i.e. human), none of the rest inspired me.  Jellyfish, cone snails, puffer, and stone fish tend to lurk mainly under water, and one doesn’t see many black mambas or hyenas in Manchester or Moraira.

    But while I was reading up on all the fascinating facts on these apparently deadly creatures, an advert for Blevins Franks kept popping up to invite me to download their facts on tax for British expats.  So, being an adventurous sort of gal, I clicked on the link and went through to an amazing library of tax guides for expats in different jurisdictions.

    Fascinated to discover such a knowledgeable firm which purports to be “the leading international tax and wealth management advisers to UK nationals living in Europe”, I looked up their license and found that they are not licensed, as they claim to be, for advice in Spain.  I think that is fraud…anyway, I digress – back to my quest for a suitable creature for our pension scammer metaphor.

    Anyway, I think I have come up with one – the poodle!

    A very small poodle versus a very large dandelion

    And not just any poodle, but the one that lives in my house. His name is Piggles.   If we leave a bag of rubbish within reach, he will tear it to pieces.  If you leave any food lying about (pizza crusts, the last biscuit in the packet, a few crumbs of chocolate) he will devour it.  If you try and move him off the sofa, he will bite you.  And his teeth are very sharp.

    On second thoughts, perhaps “poodle” doesn’t quite have the right ring about it.  Maybe we need something bigger and more frightening like spaniel or labrador? Or maybe “loose floor tile” over which I tripped the other day and broke one of my toes.

    Maybe I need Saatchi and Saatchi to come up with something really clever – like the new FCA logo (which looks exactly like the old one).  They would probably charge £70k and come up with “really nasty, aggressive, horrible scorpion that falls out of overhead lockers on United Airlines’ lockers”.

    While I have been writing this blog, I have been doing a spot of cooking (which I am rumoured to do occasionally) and have come up with an inspired creature: the “tick” – mainly based on what former tPR Chair David Norgrove stated on 13.7.2010 (just before Ark and the Tudor Capital Management scams were launched):  “Any administrator who simply ticks a box and allows the transfer, post July 2010, is failing in their duty as a trustee and as such are liable to compensate the beneficiary.”

    What LGPS did to their victims

    The tick!!!

    This encompasses everything: the fact that ticks are parasites; the fact that tPR warned about negligent ceding trustees are liable to compensate their beneficiares for negligent “ticks“; the fact that ticks are disgusting, blood-sucking creatures which transfer life-threatening diseases to their hosts; the fact that tPR warned ceding providers against ticks in a box but then took no action; the fact that the scammers are now enjoying £millions worth of rewards from ruining thousands of pension savers’ retirement incomes etc…..

    The fact that Tinky Winky is now going to be working for an “administrator who simply ticked a box and allowed a transfer, post July 2010, is failing in their duty as a trustee and as such is liable to compensate the beneficiary”  is great news.  Because an LGPS victim is in the High Court on 19.6.2017.  And her ceding provider, LGPS, ticked a box and failed in their duty and is liable to compensate her.  Nice one Tinky Winky.