Tag: Blu Debt Management

  • FAST PENSIONS – SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT – STATIONARY REGULATORS

    FAST PENSIONS – SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT – STATIONARY REGULATORS

    Fast Pensions – Slow Law Enforcement – Stationary Regulators – same old, same old.  Looks like the embarrassment of our hopeless, lazy and impotent regulators and limp law enforcement when it comes to financial crime has struck yet another blow for justice and another goal for the scammers in this case the Moats of Fast Pensions.

    Pension Life Blog - FAST PENSIONS - SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT - STATIONARY REGULATORS - The Moats

    his case the Moats of Fast Pensions.

    Pension Life Blog - The Moats - FAST PENSIONS - SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT - STATIONARY REGULATORSThe Fast Pensions scam couldn’t have been much more obvious: a known scammer – Peter Moat of Blu Debt Management (one of the promoters of the Ark Pension scam and associate of Stephen Ward) had set up a very clumsy pension liberation scam.  It was loosely modeled on Ward’s Ark scam, but as Moat was clearly nowhere near as intelligent and crafty as Ward, it was screamingly obvious from square one that it was an outright fraud.

    In fact, if you think about how the Moats got this scam got off the ground, it was the usual routine:

    • HMRC registered 15 occupations pension schemes (whereas with Ark it was 14)
    • The sponsoring employer had never traded, nor had any prospect of ever trading or employing anyone
    • The trustee firm, FP Scheme Trustees, had a sole director: Jane Wright. A young woman who worked as Peter Moat’s bookkeeper – with no experience in being a pension trustee and was only paid to be a “stooge” to keep Peter Moat’s name out of the scheme
    • Peter Moat’s main business was loans – personal and bridging

    HMRC and the Pensions Regulator did nothing to check this obvious scam out.  All the might of Britain’s regulators and law enforcement stood by while, courtesy of the Moats, more than 400 people were defrauded out of their life savings – FAST PENSIONS – SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT – STATIONARY REGULATORS.

    Between November 2016 and May 2017, there were 18 complaints by Fast Pensions victims to the Pensions Ombudsman.  All 18 were upheld.  It was clear from the complaints and the Ombudsman’s determinations that the scheme was a scam and that the Moats, Peter and his wife Sara, were out and out fraudsters.

    Pension Life Blog - The Moats - FAST PENSIONS - SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT - STATIONARY REGULATORSStill, neither the regulators nor law enforcement agencies lifted a finger to stop the Moats: FAST PENSIONS – SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT – STATIONARY REGULATORS, is the basis of this case.

    The Moats remain living in luxury in their palatial villa in Javea on the Costa Blanca – driving around in their flash cars.  What paid for this gorgeous lifestyle was £millions stolen from innocent, hard-working British citizens – while the callous, lazy, impotent regulators and law-enforcement agencies stood by and watched.  

    As the great parliamentarian Edmund Burke said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”  In my humble view, what is even worse is for hopeless and uncaring men to do worse than nothing: to pretend to be good men.

    On this sad and disgusting topic, I will write no more – but leave this blog’s words to the son of one of the victims who attended the High Court hearing in the matter of the winding up petition by the Insolvency Service against Peter and Sara Moat, Fast Pensions, FP Scheme Trustees, the 15 bogus occupational pension schemes and Moat’s various loan companies.

    Fast Pensions Victim
    Vs
    Fast Pensions Ltd.

    Claimant: Fast Pensions Victim
    (Fast Pensions Ltd DM1 Scheme member)
    Defendant:
    Fast Pensions Ltd

    Manchester Court of Justice
    Date: 30th May 2018 Time: 14:00.
    Case Reference: Claim No XXXX of 2018.

    Case:

    In 2012 my father had a personal pension fund which had accumulated to over £XXXX as a result of him working hard and saving over a number of years.

    In September of that year my father took a “cold call” from a gentleman representing a
    consultancy firm called Capital Consulting. He was informed that by transferring his pension funds from the existing scheme to another pension scheme he would benefit in as much that he could withdraw 25% of his pension fund (tax-free) on the transfer and sign up to a Five-Year Fixed
    Plan giving my father a fixed 5% bonus each year over the 5 years, and at the end of the 5
    years could have a payout without any fixed penalties.

    My father thought through this proposal, as there had been and still were serious issues with the Equitable regarding pension schemes, so my father arranged to have a home visit from Capital Consulting.

    He listened to their proposals and then decided to accept the proposal.  My father signed into the DM1 Retirement Plan on the 4th. October 2012, the administrators were to be AC. Management & Administration Ltd, who at that time were based in Gorseinon, South Wales. A sum of over £XXXX was then transferred into the ACMA Client Account of Barclays Bank Cardiff.

    On the 26th October 2012 my father received a letter from a Jane Wright (Pension
    Processor) stating that the 5 Year Plan had now started with Fast Pensions.  Soon after signing up to the scheme some of the initial promises of the scheme did not materialise so my father made numerous phone calls on the one phone no. that was available 08453730569 which would transfer onto answerphone on most occasions.

    My father’s main concern related to the following. “We have just recently developed a client
    login area and this should be available shortly. This will enable you to track your pension.”

    My father phoned regarding this facility and on the few occasions he managed to receive an
    answer he spoke to Jane Wright who stated that there was IT issues but it would be up and
    running shortly. My father is still waiting.

    My father received annual statements for his DMI Retirement Plan for 2013/2014/2015.
    My father did not contact Fast Pensions Ltd again until June 2015, when he applied
    for a Flexi Drawdown Payment of £XXXX. The drawdown application was made on the 20th
    June 2015. Legislation had been introduced in April 2015, whereby a member of a pension
    scheme had the option of using this legislation to withdraw an amount from their pension
    fund, so my father took up this option from Fast Pensions.

    The drawdown application was made on the 20th June 2015. It was eventually paid out as
    two payments. The first payment of £XXXX was paid in October 2015 as an interim payment
    and the balance was paid on the 9th November 2015.

    There are number of reasons why this took so long and for the money to be received. The
    main reason was the total lack of communication from Fast Pensions.

    Fast Pensions Ltd had, as already mentioned, one contact number which was an 0845
    number which would obviously cost more than the standard rate to call often to be met by
    an answering machine, and incidentally cost my father a large amount of money. When my
    father did manage to succeed, it was from a Paul Bennett (Pension Administrator) who was
    so unhelpful and uncooperative towards my father’s questions. He would often be met with
    “I will have to speak to my manager Mr Gary Henderson and get him to come back to you”

    During these months I personally spoke to Paul Bennett as he would often ignore calls from
    my father’s mobile and found if I called from a withheld number he would accept the call. I
    personally found Mr Bennett to be constantly unable to answer questions often just finding
    excuses to the questions in which he was presented with. Mr Bennett on one occasion told
    me he could not speak to me as I was not the policy holder. Mr Bennett was provided with a
    letter of authority from my father to enable me to act on his behalf.

    Owing to the lack of responses, my father asked Paul Bennett for Mr Henderson’s email or
    telephone number but was told” it was not company policy to issues clients with direct
    contact details.”

    Throughout the period of time dealing with Mr Bennett there would be long delays between
    his emails and responses so again adding to a further delay of dealing with the drawdown
    application.

    My father was asked to return the completed application forms to the registered address in
    London (being a “virtual address”). He duly sent the paperwork to this address to have it
    returned to sender, so my father sent it again, this time by recorded delivery which was also
    returned by the Royal Mail stating “no one is available to sign for it”. My father actually
    spoke to Head of Operations at the Westminster sorting office to verify this. Mr. Bennett on
    the rare occasion my father actually spoke to him, stated there had been problems but had
    now been rectified. It certainly had not.

    This was further evidence of a total breakdown of communication and excuses for not
    dealing with my father’s request. Eventually Mr Bennett responded to this issue and issued
    the forms again which were this time sent by e-mail. My father was then informed by Mr
    Bennett that he had missed the deadline for the end of August pay run and he would not
    receive it that month. The delays were simply down to lack of cooperation and
    communication from Mr Bennett and Fast Pensions Ltd. At this point Fast Pensions paid an
    interim payment of £XXXX as my father had repeatedly told Paul Bennett that he was
    struggling financially.

    He was later quoted by Mr Bennett that the balance of the drawdown payment would reach
    his account by 30th September 2015, not surprisingly this did not happen. He did although
    receive a payment slip with the current amounts of the drawdown, £XXXX gross and
    £XXXX net. My father received the notification from the HMRC that Fast Pensions Ltd had
    informed them of the payment, which my father finally received in full as already mentioned
    by the 9thNovember 2015. I will point out at this time, that this transaction to the HMRC will
    have been completed with an RTI. Note what occurs when Fast Pensions try to send the RTI
    for the second drawdown payment.

    On several occasions my father requested an explanation and apology for the total lack of
    communication, payment delays, mal-administration, and mismanagement from Fast
    Pensions Ltd. This was never received.

    Owing to the serious issues concerning Fast Pensions my father decided to seek advice from
    an independent regulated Financial Advisor. They highlighted various issues, including the
    way the transfer from the Equitable to Fast Pensions had been organised.

    At this time my father requested the paperwork from both Fast Pensions Ltd and the
    Equitable Life regarding the transfer of funds. One of the main questions which came out of
    the independent advice and requested from Fast Pensions Ltd was details of the pension
    fund and the fund portfolio. My father never received this information.

    Over the previous few months the worry, financial distress and health issues caused by Fast
    Pensions Ltd was having an effect on my father, so he took a break before he applied for his
    next drawdown payment.

    On the 29th January 2016 my father contacted Fast Pensions Ltd to apply for his next
    drawdown. He requested the payment after the 5th April 2016.  This was to give Fast Pensions
    enough time to process the application and fall into the 2016/2017 tax year.

    At this point we were aware of Fast Pensions Ltd being under investigation by South Wales
    Fraud Squad. My father had provided South Wales Fraud Squad with several pieces of
    evidence in relation to his dealings with Fast Pensions Ltd.

    In February 2016 my father received several emails from Paul Bennet quoting that the
    request was received and would be processed, but it was becoming evident that from the
    end of February 2016, there was no answer from Fast Pensions Ltd and all communication
    ceased. No emails or telephone calls were received from Mr Bennett from the end of
    February 2016. On 23rd March 2016, my father received an email from DC. Andy Holmes of
    the Economic Crime Unit who informed my father that Paul Bennett had terminated all links
    with Fast Pensions Ltd and had left at the end of February 2016.

    Mr. Bennett had quoted on his LinkedIn profile that he was employed by a company called
    Jackson Wood from August 2014 until February 2016. (No mention of Fast Pensions) I then
    decided to enquire about Jackson Wood Ltd and found a familiar name as the Director. Mr
    Ian Stuart Chapman, who is also the director of

    – Umbrella Loans. (07331044)
    – Blu Financial Services Ltd. (05912973)
    – Blu Debt Management (06699233)

    My father was later made aware by DC Andy Holmes (Economic Crime Unit, Wales) that
    Paul Bennett had been helping with enquiries in relation to Fast Pensions Ltd. He also
    informed my father that Paul Bennet had left Fast Pensions Ltd without informing him.
    From the period of Paul Bennet ceasing communication at the end of February my
    father could not contact anyone at Fast Pensions.

    My father, at a later date checked Mr Bennett’s profile and noted that he had
    moved to a company called Silverene Administration of 50, Chorley Road, Bolton, BL1
    4AP, (company no 09088060). He has again moved on and is now employed by a
    company called Cranfords, Pension Administrators.

    The Director of Silverene Administration Ltd is a Merle Oper who was also the founder
    of Umbrella Loans Ltd from 2010-April 2014.

    Mr Bennett provided my father with an email to contact Sara Moat
    (sara.moat@blupropertygroup.com) surprisingly Sara Moat never replied to any of my
    father’s emails.

    My father did not receive any communication from Fast Pensions from February 2016
    until May 2016. This was when he received a letter from Sara Moat informing my father
    that Paul Bennett had left Fast Pensions (it had only taken three months for Fast
    Pensions to mention this)) and due to his departure, they had experienced difficulties
    and delays. Sara Grace Moat quoted in this letter that the ongoing request had been
    sent to payroll department, and my father would receive confirmation of this within 14
    days. My father is still waiting for that confirmation.

    It was now becoming a very serious situation as all communication with Fast Pensions had
    ceased and this was continuing to cause my father further stress, financial difficulties, and
    ongoing health issues.

    “If you believe that a firm has promoted or sold you a UCIS that is not suitable for you,
    sold a UCIS to you unlawfully or without fully explaining the risks, you should make a
    complaint to the firm involved”. (www.fca.org.uk)

    Regarding the above reference from the FCA website, the amount of times me and
    my father have complained about the conduct of Fast Pensions – it is all recorded and has
    also being made available to those requesting it, i.e. Economic Crime Unit, Serious Fraud
    Office and others.

    After several requests for information on my father’s investment, including the
    investment portfolio, and an up to date statement, I do believe that the reason you have
    not made it available, is that it was put into a UCIS.

    Therefore, I find myself alongside my father reading peoples experiences, comments
    and consequences resulting from Fast Pensions. Not to mention the contact with the
    Serious Fraud Unit and Economic Crime Unit who are all actively investigating Fast
    Pensions. Hence the reason why my father and I openly and transparently discuss all
    emails to them relating to Fast Pensions Limited.

    Angie Brooks’ is also against the miss-selling of Pension Schemes which are sold by
    introducers or untrustworthy IFA’s. In the case of my father was ill-informed and misled as
    to the DM1 pension scheme and the fact is being an unregulated scheme, of which you
    have admitted to in your IDRP response. I am only too aware of the risks with
    unregulated schemes after several hours of research, because of my father’s experience
    with Fast Pensions Ltd.

    I am also aware of the relationship Angie Brooks has with the Pension Regulator, HMRC,
    Insolvency Services and the FCA, and the assistance my father is giving to the Serious
    Fraud Office. At this moment in time Fast Pensions Ltd and its Trustees have stated
    nothing to defend or deny these comments, in fact they are simply adding to the negative
    experiences the members are having with Fast Pensions.

    The appellant’s statement descibed above is followed by more than 30,000 words describing the catalog of lies and obfuscation by the Moats and their associates, and the deterioration in his vicim’s health.  During this whole time, there were no arrests and no action by the regulators – FAST PENSIONS – SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT – STATIONARY REGULATORS – disgusting all round!

    The Insolvency Service has now, finally, placed the various entities involved into liquidation.  It remains to be seen whether any money will ever be traced and recovered from this scam.

     

     

  • FAST PENSIONS TO DIE A SLOW DEATH

    FAST PENSIONS TO DIE A SLOW DEATH

    Pension Life Blog - Fast Pensions to die a slow death - Peter and Sarah MoatFast Pensions, run by Peter and Sara Moat, is finally to be wound up.  There will be a hearing at the High Court in Manchester on 30th May 2018.  The winding-up petition also includes the 15 pension schemes run by the Moats, FP Scheme Trustees and four loan companies.

    This follows a special measure by the Insolvency Service at a hearing on 29th March. The Official Receiver is the interim liquidator – meaning that it is responsible for investigating the affairs of the companies – including third party or trust monies.  The OR is also tasked with protecting whatever (if anything) is left of the schemes’ assets.

    Most of these 15 schemes involved some form of pension liberation operated through the Moats’ loan companies: Blu Debt Management, Blu Financial Services, Blu Personal Finance, and Umbrella Loans.

    Pension Life Blog - FAST PENSIONS TO DIE A SLOW DEATH - Peter and Sarah Moats Blu loan companies flushed victims pension funds down the drainFor a man who can’t spell the word “Blue” (I wonder how he spells green?  Probably with a “d” at the end), Peter Moat has been very successful with his series of scams and had amassed a fortune large enough to purchase a magnificent house in Javea on the Costa Blanca.  He has now sold the house and hopefully has paid back some of the many people in the area to whom he owes money.

    My question, however, is why it has taken the Insolvency Service so long?  There have been around 20 damning Pensions Ombudsman’s determinations which severely criticised Fast Pensions for maladministration.  The POS has ordered Fast Pensions to pay benefits and compensation – but this has mostly been ignored.  Many victims have reported the Moats to Action Fraud, as well as the Serious Fraud Office, and sent reports to the Pensions Regulator.  But the Moats have been left at the helm for several years – long after action should have been taken to protect the victims’ interests.

    It is very important that members of the below Fast pension schemes send an email to:

    piu.north@insolvency.gsi.gov.uk

    giving their name, contact details, name of scheme, transfer date and amount of transfer – as well as any “loans”.

    Broughton Retirement Plan
    DM1 Retirement Plan
    Elphinstone Retirement Plan
    EP1 Retirement Plan
    Fleming Retirement Plan
    FP1 Retirement Plan
    FP2 Retirement Plan
    FP3 Retirement Plan
    Galileo Retirement Plan
    Golden Arrow Retirement Plan
    Leafield Retirement Plan
    Springdale Retirement Plan
    Talisman Retirement Plan
    Templar Retirement Plan
    VRSEB Retirement Plan

    The problem is now going to be: how long is the investigation/unscrambling process going to take?  The Insolvency Service sat on the Capita Oak scheme for a couple of years after winding up Imperial Trustees – refusing to appoint an insolvency practitioner (even though we had pressed them to use Grant Thornton).  Eventually, the IS appointed Dalriada Trustees as independent trustee in early 2017.  This was four years after the IS had started investigating Capita Oak.

    This snail approach leaves distressed victims in a terrible state of limbo – not knowing whether they have lost part of all of their pension fund.  This unnecessary delay is totally unacceptable – as is the repeated failure to prosecute scammers like the Moats.  I sincerely hope that there will now be swift, decisive and effective action to ensure a positive outcome for the victims and appropriate justice for the Moats.  The last thing the victims of Fast Pensions need is for this already late investigation to die a slow death.

    **************************************************************

    As always, Pension Life would like to remind you that if you are planning to transfer any pension funds, make sure that you are transferring into a legitimate scheme. To find out how to avoid being scammed, please see our blog:

    What is a pension scam?

    FOLLOW PENSION LIFE ON TWITTER TO KEEP UP WITH ALL THINGS PENSION RELATED, GOOD AND BAD.

     

  • BRIDGEBANK CAPITAL AND THE FAST PENSION SCAM

    BRIDGEBANK CAPITAL AND THE FAST PENSION SCAM

    We know Fast Pensions is a scam - but is Bridgebank Capital No. 5 kosher?
    Frantic with worry – the Fast Pensions victims now know their pension funds are being used for property loans.

    Bridgebank Capital seems to be a bona fide property loan company – providing bridging and development finance. Nothing wrong with that.

     

    But Bridgebank Capital No. 5 seems to be full of Fast Pensions money and locked into term loans secured on a variety of domestic and commercial properties.  Each charge refers to the trustees of four of the Fast Pensions schemes: DM1, FP1, EP1 and Leafield.  The trustees of each of these schemes are clearly identified at Companies House as Sara Moat and Martin Peacock.  (Interestingly, Sara Moat is telling victims that “the trustees” have to decide what happens to the pension monies – while hiding the fact that she is the trustee).

    Of great concern is the fact that one of the borrowers, Clearclose, has gone bust owing the pension fund nearly £900k.

    The Pensions Ombudsman has made 18 determinations against Fast Pensions – but Sara and Peter Moat of Fast Pensions have studiously ignored them.  I sent links to all of the background to Fast Pensions to Laurence Goodman of Bridgebank Capital on 6th August 2017:

    Dear Mr. Goodman

    It was good to speak to you on Friday.
    First of all, may I say that I recognise that Bridgebank Capital is a bona fide finance company and I mean no criticism against you or your company in the summary I am setting out below.  I have tried to summarise the position in a bullet-point series of statements to make this as easy to understand as possible.
    Once you have read and digested this, please can we start a dialogue about what happens next.  What the members need to know, is how much do these various loans/charges/mortgages in favour of the four Fast Pensions schemes realise when they mature, and what will happen to the money.  I realise you are restricted to an extent in terms of what you can tell me, but there are many Fast Pensions victims who will happily provide you with letters of authority as they are the beneficiaries of the pension schemes and have a legal right to know what has happened to their pension funds.
    Best, Angie
    —————-
    * There are hundreds of members of various pension schemes (including DM1, FP1, EP1 and Leafield) run by Peter and Sara Moat of Fast Pensions – a pensions administration company.
    * The Moats maintain they are not the trustees of the schemes.  Peter Moat (masquerading as “James Porter”) told me the trustee was a company called FP Scheme Trustees, of which one Jane Wright is sole director.  She was an employee of Moat’s at his former company Blu Properties in Javea which folded and it is believed she was paid to be the director of this company.
    * The charges registered at Companies House for Bridgebank Capital No. 5 show all the loans as being in favour of Sara Moat and Martin Peacock (an associate of Peter Moat’s) as trustees of the Fast Pensions schemes.
    * The various Fast Pensions schemes – including DM1, FP1, EP1 and Leafield – I believe are all bogus occupational schemes.  When I say bogus, what I mean is that they were not set up to provide genuine pensions for employees of a company which intended to trade and create jobs, but merely as a vehicle for a pension liberation scam.
    * Peter Moat told me (while he was masquerading as a “James Porter”) that the underlying assets of the Fast Pensions schemes were “invested in Bridgebank Capital” and also in another loan company called Pamplona Capital Partners.  Clearly, having the underlying assets of a pension scheme solely “invested” in property loans is not acceptable.  A pension scheme is required to have low-risk, liquid assets as members have a statutory right to a transfer and need to be able to take their 25% tax-free lump sum at age 55, or retire or die.
    * The Moats have failed dismally to communicate with the members or respond to transfer requests for a long period of time – causing considerable distress to the victims.  The Pensions Ombudsman has made a large number of determinations in response to complaints by the victims and has ordered Fast Pensions to allow the victims to transfer out and pay compensation for their distress.  These 18 determinations have all been ignored by Fast Pensions:
    Needless to say, there is no evidence that the Moats have complied with any of these determinations and the victims themselves report that they have not.
    * Alongside the pension transfers and lending of the pension funds to Bridgebank Capital No. 5, the Moats were operating pension liberation in the form of loans from Moat’s companies Blu Debt Management and Umbrella Loans.  Victims were told these loans were not connected to the pension transfers and would not be taxable.  HMRC is now sending out tax demands in respect of these loans.
    * There are grave concerns about the Bridgebank Capital No. 5 loans for the following reasons:
    1. We do not know what the total amount lent to Bridgebank Capital is
    2. There are multiple loans to the same parties
    3. One borrower is in liquidation
    4, We do not know what the terms of the loans or the interest payable are
    * The greatest concern is that if any part of the money is recoverable and is paid back into the control of the Moats, it will simply “disappear” again and not be available for the benefit of the members who are the ultimate beneficiaries.