MALTA – THE ALTAR OF FRAUD
Malta has a long history of facilitating not just massive-scale pension fraud, but all types of financial fraud as well.
Recent reports indicate a sharp increase in fraud cases and financial losses in the grubby little island of Malta. A corrupt jurisdiction where neither the financial regulator nor the government attempts to tackle fraud committed and facilitated in Malta – despite compelling evidence from Malta’s own Arbiter.
A 2024 major fraud investigation by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office led to the charging of eleven suspects for fraud and corruption that caused €161 million worth of damage to the EU budget. CrimeMalta Observatory data shows a 900% increase in fraud cases from 245 in 2008 to 2,905 cases in 2023. And yet Malta President Myriam Spiteri Debono has shown zero interest in combatting fraud or cleaning up Malta’s dirty financial services act.
Why is Malta the altar of fraud?
Pension fraud remains by far the biggest financial crime in Malta – especially as it is not included at all in any of the European Public Prosecutor’s or CrimeMalta’s statistics. With billions of pounds in the hands of around ten leading QROPS providers, Malta facilitates a massive international fraud network involving secret commissions passing between unregulated, unscrupulous brokers and the Isle of Man insurance companies. These include Utmost International, RL360 and Hansard.
The Maltese QROPS providers (administrators and trustees) have for fifteen years worked hand in hand with the worst of the greedy and dishonest advisers, introducers, salesmen and brokers to ruin hundreds of thousands of lives – using unregulated insurance bonds and toxic investments.
There are many thousands of victims of pension and investment fraud whose life savings are stuck in Malta. But their losses are also bounced around multiple jurisdictions. Here is an example:
- Victim in Spain is “advised” by an insurance broker in Dubai (such as Holborn Assets, Globaleye, Guardian Wealth Management or DeVere) with no license to provide pension or investment advice to an EU resident.
- Victim’s pension is transferred from the UK to Malta – into the hands of one of the various QROPS providers who encourage members to place their funds into an unregulated insurance bond in the Isle of Man, Ireland or the Cayman Islands
- The rogue “adviser” now has control of the victim’s money and invests them in toxic, high-commission assets from more rogue and complicit jurisdictions such as Guernsey, Switzerland, Germany, Cayman Islands and beyond.
- These toxic investments are provided by the insurance bond providers (Utmost, RL360 and Hansard) and pay further undisclosed commissions to the fraudsters.
Most pension-fraud victims’ losses occur in Malta and the Isle of Man or Ireland. After deduction of the transfer, introduction and advice fees – as well as the QROPS set up costs – the remaining funds are placed in an insurance bond which pays the broker up to 8% hidden commission. But this first commission is just the beginning – the fraudster is now in control of the victim’s portfolio (often with forged client signatures), and there are further unlimited commissions to be earned from destroying the funds with high-risk, unsuitable investments.
But scammers, greedy opportunists and fraudsters operate in all corners of the World – not just in the traditional fraud centres of Malta, Gibraltar and the Isle of Man. Wherever there are clusters of British expats, there are hordes of unregulated predators posing as “financial advisers”, “wealth managers” or “pension consultants”. And Malta just loves these conmen (they are mostly male) and the QROPS providers are more than happy to give them terms of business – and accept business from them.
For the vast majority of the Malta QROPS providers, it is purely a “numbers” game. The more members they get, the more fees they receive. So these providers welcome all members with open arms – irrespective of whether the transfers are in the interests of the members or not. And the more toxic, high-risk/high-commission investments the Malta providers allow, the happier their clients (the dishonest advisers and brokers) are, and the more transfers they will recommend. It is a vicious – and highly profitable – circle.
Most of the fraudsters (commission-hungry “advisers” and brokers) – whose crimes are incubated in Malta – don’t actually steal their victims’ money. They just leverage the investors’ pensions and life savings for fat, hidden commissions. However, one notable exception to this rule is convicted criminal Mark Donnelly of Brite Advisors. He just helped himself to at least £219 million of his victims’ pensions and life savings. A further £250,000 was spent by Donnelly on two Porsches for him and his wife.
All of the leading Malta QROPS providers have been fined for regulatory non-compliance and/or failing in their fiduciary duties to their members. The complaints by victims of Malta QROPS are all set out on the Malta Arbiter’s website: https://financialarbiter.org.mt/oafs/decisions
The public needs to be aware of the Maltese QROPS providers who facilitate so much investment fraud and illegal hidden commission. Existing victims need to transfer away from Malta as soon as possible, and future potential victims need to be warned about the very real dangers of allowing their life savings to be transferred to Malta in the first place. Also, Malta needs to be removed from the HMRC QROPS list altogether.
WHICH QROPS PROVIDERS MAKE MALTA THE ALTAR OF FRAUD?
Boal & Co – a relatively minor player on the Malta QROPS stage. It claims to have £1 billion AUM (assets under management) The firm’s “technical sales manager” is John Batty who previously had quite a legacy at Momentum Pensions. It was Batty who set up the deals for Momentum with unregulated spivs – such as Continental Wealth Management – posing as advisers.
Dominion Trustees – by far the most expensive QROPS provider in Malta. But even paying £3,000 a year for a QROPS does not protect victims from investment fraud. Three Dominion members reported to the Malta Arbiter that they had been introduced by convicted killer Darrin Brownlee-Jones of Holborn Assets to St James International (owned by Square Mile International) and advised to invest in the Privilege Wealth payday-loans loan note fraud. One complaint lost £200,000 and another £250,000. And Dominion did nothing to prevent these high-risk, unsuitable and fraudulent commission-laden investments.
Infinity International Pension Plan – this provider was subject to an administrative penalty by the Malta Financial Services Authority in 2019, relating to six pension schemes administered by ITC International Pensions Limited which has a couple of Arbiter complaints against it.
MC Trustees – owned and controlled by the infamous criminal and serial fraudster Mark Donnelly – was fined by the Malta regulator: https://international-adviser.com/malta-based-trust-company-fined/ It is alleged that MC Trustees is being sold to Richard Cayne of Relay Group (BVI) by Mark Donnelly. Why would anyone buy anything from such a notorious criminal – especially an entity saturated with toxic assets? Many of the victims in MC Trustees were given pension-transfer advice by Donnelly’s UK “advice” firm Basi & Basi which is now called Donre Advisory and is in liquidation.
Momentum Malta Retirement Trust – this is probably the worst of all the Malta QROPS providers. It has more than 100 Arbiter complaints against it for failing in its fiduciary duties and allowing millions of pounds’ worth of investments in high-risk structured notes which were only suitable for professional investors. More than 70 victims of the Continental Wealth fraud made Arbiter complaints against Momentum. The complainants detailed the crippling losses resulting from irresponsible investments in high-risk (and high-commission) structured notes made by Jody Smart’s unregulated Spanish company. Smart has now been convicted of fraud and swindling and faces a four-year prison sentence. Momentum chairman Mark Gaywood reported that he had been so upset by the victims complaining about their investment losses that he had to go out and treat himself to a Porsche to cheer himself up.
Optimus Retirement Benefit Scheme – along with Integrated Capabilities – has three Arbiter complaints against it. Along with STM, Optimus was a favourite accomplice of Aktiva Wealth Management (aka Square Mile International and Planet Pensions). Optimus was happy to accommodate high-risk (high-commission) investments in fraudulent investments such as Blackmore Global and Symphony. Optimus also allowed members’ pension funds to be placed – entirely unnecessarily – in an Investors Trust insurance bond in the Cayman Islands.
Sovereign Pension Services – with 12 Arbiter complaints against it, Sovereign has allowed many members to be placed in unregulated insurance bonds and then invested in high-risk, inappropriate assets. Sovereign makes no attempt to ensure that investment advisers or managers are qualified, regulated and experienced enough to advise retail investors. And when the investment dealing instructions include investments which are clearly much too high risk, Sovereign makes no attempt to intervene as trustee (with a fiduciary duty to protect members from rogue advisers).
STM Malta Pension Services – with 18 Arbiter complaints against it, STM has a long history of allowing unregulated brokers and so-called advisers to place members in unregulated insurance bonds and then invest them in high-risk (and high-commission) assets which were entirely unsuitable for retail investors. STM Malta also took over Harbour Pensions from Justin Caffrey who had done business with serial fraudsters Square Mile International (previously Aktiva Wealth Management and subsequently Planet Pensions) bought by Mark Donnelly for £650,000 which he stole from his Brite Advisors clients.
Malta – and the QROPS providers – have been complicit with the long-running fraud operated between insurance bond providers (such as Utmost, RL360, Hansard and Investors Trust) and the rogue, commission-hungry, unregulated brokers for at least fifteen years. Without Malta’s cheerful and enthusiastic facilitation of billions of pounds’ worth of fraud, thousands of victims might have been spared the misery and ruin of losing their pensions.
Despite at least 12 ongoing EU investigations into fraud in Malta, with a total potential damage of about €161 million, no individuals have been brought to court in relation to these cases as of the latest report.
The Malta Financial Services Authority does nothing to shut these QROPS providers down and prosecute those responsible. Meanwhile, the Maltese government stands idly by and ignores the widespread fraud which is rife throughout Malta.
There is no excuse for ignoring these massive financial crimes. The Malta Arbiter complaints report in detail the QROPS providers’ repeated willingness to facilitate investment fraud. But these complaints are only the tip of the iceberg as behind the very few who do manage to make Arbiter complaints, there are many thousands more who do not.
Malta is only one of several rogue jurisdictions which harbour, foster and rejoice in greed and fraud. It is important to highlight the dangers of these countries (and their flaccid governments, regulators and courts) which allow and even encourage financial crime:
Cayman Islands, Dubai, Gibraltar, Guernsey, Isle of Man, Jersey, Malta (and various others – INCLUDING THE UK!).
Shame on Malta. Shame on the MFSA – the Malta financial services regulator. And shame on the Maltese government. Malta has the power to shut down much of this fraud – but chooses not to.




Have to say….. it’s well overdue these Trustees were called out! It’s been over six years since the large group of complaints were against Momentum to the Arbiter, and over three years since the payments were made to victims! Yes so many more people could have made complaints….
The MFSA warns against unregulated firms – but it completely fails to warn against the regulated firms. And that is why it is essential that pressure is put on the MFSA to deregister all these firms – to stop them from ruining any more lives.
Just De-registering, imho, is wholly insufficient. The Retirement Scheme Administrators (RSA’s) should be given huge fines because they knew at the material time they were facilitating a scam against their members.
One of the Arbiter’s decisions against STM (ASF 024/2021 listed above under the 18 complaints against STM – which I think are brilliant links btw) says on page 47: “the [Blackmore Global] Fund was not appropriate and suitable for the scope of the Retirement Scheme and the applicable requirements … one cannot really justify how the investment in the BG Fund was allowed in the first place and how no Trustee and RSA had ever raised any issues about the incompatibility and inadequacy of such investment within the Retirement Scheme” and says further on page 48: “… It is indeed somewhat incredulous how, in the face of the glaring and manifest breaches of trust…”
It is inconceivable to think the RSA’s were ignorant of the “glaring” breaches of trust they were committing. It is also inconceivable the law firms that they employ ( the best in Malta defending them against complaints) weren’t advising them they were commiting “glaring” breaches of trust! The RSA’s knew what they were doing and the consequences to victims and they willingly went ahead with these transfers for their own financial gain and facilitated a massive scam for years right under the nose of the Malta regulators and the government who simply let it happen. They should be personally accountable for their actions – not just de-register the QROP – seriously? Huge fines for all imho.
ATTENTION JESMOND GATT – CHAIRMAN OF THE MALTA FINANCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY
I am writing to urge you to deregister the leading Malta QROPS providers who have facilitated fraud. The background to this request can be found on this blog:
https://pension-life.com/malta-the-altar-of-fraud/20/08/2025/
Undisclosed commissions constitute fraud – and your QROPS providers have been facilitating this fraud for more than 15 years.
Malta’s Arbiter details the regulatory failures by these firms. The complainants evidence the repeated use of insurance bonds (such as Utmost, RL360, SEB and Hansard) and commission-laden investments.
Arbiter complaints also include details of high-risk, high-commission assets such as professional-investor-only structured notes (e.g. Leonteq), loan notes (e.g. Privilege Wealth) and UCIS funds. All of these have caused serious – sometimes total – loss to the victims’ pension funds – while filling the pockets of the fraudulent brokers and bond providers.
On behalf of the many victims of pension fraud facilitated by Maltese QROPS providers, I urge you to terminate the licenses of all these culpable providers so that they can no longer ruin innocent lives.
I am now still working at 66 be
cause of these fraudsters
CAROL AND CHRIS SUTTON
As Susan says in a comment to this blog, it is about time someone started to call out the QROPS for their willing and knowing facilitation of pension scams in the past decade or more. I really like this blog and the links were very helpful! Once upon a time this website was all over the scammers like a rash but then went into radio silence for some years. Is it back now shining the spotlight on those organisations that willingly and knowingly enabled the scammers? We’ll see.
I take my hat off to the CWM victims. Their success was due to a highly effective Facebook group that proactively helped its members make the complaints to the Malta Arbiter. The same cannot be said of the victims of Blackmore Global(BG) – the offshore fund owned by Phillip Nunn and Patrick McCreesh which was started in 2014 and went bust in Aug 2022 – (https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/4142069?mainwebsite=1 ). As the article describes Malta was their jurisdiction of choice. Harbour Pensions started by Justin Caffery was the first QROPS to import pensions into it’s scheme. It was sold to STM 10th Nov 2017 earning Caffery £1.1m and STM inherited 4 pension schemes (one included BG) and 1600 victims (oops members) https://info.stmgroupplc.com/acquisition-malta-based-harbour-pensions-limited/ . Only ONE BG victim has made a successful complaint to the arbiter (ref. ASF 024/2021).
Malta launched its Arbiter office in May 2016 with Dr Reno Borg as the first Arbiter. ( https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2016-05-21/local-news/Former-Labour-candidate-Rebo-Borg-has-been-appointed-as-Arbiter-for-Financial-Services-6736158161 )
The success of the complaints (listed above in the article) must be a huge embarrassment to Malta because they have appointed a new Arbiter, Alfred Mifsud, in April 2023. According to this article, https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2016-05-21/local-news/Former-Labour-candidate-Rebo-Borg-has-been-appointed-as-Arbiter-for-Financial-Services-6736158161 by Kevin Aquilina, professor of Law at University of Malta, Mifsud is the wrong man for the job for a number of reasons. First he has no law qualifications and secondly has himself been found in breach of financial services legislation 66 times by his predecessor – the poacher is now the gamekeeper (seriously?)! It is my opinion Malta wants to halt the success of complainants and stop the upholding of complaints against the QROPS – some bright investigative journalist might want to test that theory… there’s a story there imho.
I feel there are still hundreds of victims in Malta QROPS who have lost all their pension, have not made a complaint and got restitution, either because they don’t know they can or they don’t know how to go about it and don’t have the assistance of an effective Facebook Group. However, they may well now have lost their chance with the new Arbiter – he is not a friend of the consumer!
Sadly, most victims (and, yes, you used the right word originally!) are out of time because of the strict three-year time limit. The Facebook group organised and coordinated by Susan was indeed very effective through the Arbiter route. But Momentum and STM made it as difficult as possible for the victims to get their redress. Firstly, they sued one of the leading victims for defamation when The Mail published an article about the plight of the victims of CWM. Secondly, the Arbiter’s decisions had to be enforced through the Malta courts as neither Momentum nor STM paid up voluntarily – and so the victims had to spend a substantial amount of money on legal fees and Momentum/STM fought it all the way.
I don’t know of the strict 3 year limit. I know of the 2 year time limit from when you first learn of the matter you’re complaining about. Had the same thing with our mutual friend CB. But still, 70% (minus additional legal costs) is still better than 0% which most victims are left with because they haven’t complained at all. Our mutual friend CB after winning the Arbiter complaint (024/2021) then submitted complaints to the UK Ombudsman for maladministration to recover the remaining 30% he didn’t get from the Arbiter – as I did, although my shortfall wasn’t as much as 30% as I recovered about 90% while it was still in Malta. One of his complaints has been upheld and was the biggest transfer so that’s in the bag and one still yet to be decided.
So CB is a well happy bunny as he has recovered a significant amount of his pension already and I believe retired now. I bet the CWM victims didn’t go after the ceding providers for the remaining 30% or did they? I haven’t found any Ombudsman decisions for CWM victims tbh. Did they miss a trick?
I’m going to go after all the ceding providers now. They all need to be held to account. And, in fact, all ceding providers need to be VERY wary of any transfer requests to ANY QROPS providers in Malta. As far as I can see, there is only one decent provider in Malta and that is TMF. The rest have all accepted business from scammers and invested victims’ pensions in high-risk/high-commission rubbish.
TMF. Isn’t that the QROPS Bethel C. works for? I was introduced to Bethel C. by a mutual journalist friend Helen B., when I was fighting to get my pension back from Optimus/ICML. He gave me a lot of useful pointers on Malta regulations which I used in my arguments to ICML. To give them credit, ICML did get about 90% of my money from the scammers, and got me out of the useless insurance bond without incurring the early exit penalties and waived their own exit fees for leaving the scheme; then they repatriated it back to the UK into a SIPP with the Pru. What leverage they had over the scammers I have no idea. Whatever it was it worked. I don’t know if they did same for other victims in the scheme of which there were probably dozens.
Another person that helped me greatly was your Czech IFA friend, Chris. His knowledge of the scammer’s history was a gold mine of info.
And another person that assisted via DM’s on the “legalbeagles” forum who anonymously called himself CaptainP but I never discovered who that was. He had useful info I could exploit in my battle with ICML.
Without all these people looking out for me I would have found it difficult to convince ICML they should really help put right my situation. I was convinced they had themselves, most probably, been duped by the architects of the scam to participate in facilitating it.
I’m looking fwd to seeing how you are going to approach exposing the ceding providers.