12 Comments

  1. Stephen
    May 31, 2018 @ 4:28 pm

    Same old, same old mis-selling techniques – essentially fraudulent misrepresentation – each one is like a carbon copy of another just different names. These scams are pandemic. Either the authorities get their act together soon or it will get out of control, if it isn’t already.

    Reply

  2. ian
    May 31, 2018 @ 9:25 pm

    Thanks Stephen.

    I think we might find that this one is much worse than many others but we will see……….

    Reply

  3. Andrea
    June 4, 2018 @ 3:30 pm

    I’m sure the regulator/ police will be pursuing the Moats but is it really wise to implicate a former employee by using provocative language ( an unhealthy connection )? Employees, often in fear of their jobs, can be the unwitting stooges of deceitful employers. Without any supportive evidence it might have been better to concentrate on the liability of the owners rather than including someone who at the end of the day may have no opportunity to rebut your accusation.

    Reply

    • Javi
      June 5, 2018 @ 11:22 am

      The ‘unhealthy connection’ may be the fact that Mrs Wright was paid to be the sole ‘trustee’ of FP Scheme Trustees Ltd, which in itself is against the law.
      Wright and Chapman knew exactly what was going on simply by the nature of the companies they were involved in…. Chapman, Wright and Henderson were seen regularly in Javea, wining and dining with the Moat’s, apparently showing no fear of their jobs or remuneration.
      The fact that the Moats are never now seen apparently socialising in Javea shows that they know the risks of that, as they have annoyed many people in that area… However they can still be seen every morning and afternoon, dropping off and collecting their child at school in the town of Denia, next to Javea….unless they run away from there also….

      Reply

      • Andrea
        June 6, 2018 @ 11:01 am

        I have no interest in pursuing a debate regarding this case nor do I have any interest in the personalised details you allude to. My only interest comes from browsing case files for professional reasons. I need to say however that having seen this article I did further searches and my parting shot would be that I’m surprised that no one has moderated comments to advise that it might be wise not to personalise where a court case is likely to occur and to bear in mind that libel laws apply to online posts with the UK courts ruling that it applies even to innuendo and insinuation when nothing overtly defamatory has been posted.

        Reply

  4. Thomas ord
    June 14, 2018 @ 10:14 am

    I have a plan with fast track pensions

    Reply

  5. Maureen
    June 16, 2018 @ 4:28 pm

    I also have a plan with Fast Pensions

    Reply

  6. Grant
    June 18, 2018 @ 11:04 pm

    View the Story So Far here http://pension-life.com/peter-moat-sara-moat-fast-pensions/

    Reply

  7. Brian walton
    June 28, 2018 @ 1:45 pm

    Another case you did not attend?
    Another case you claim as a your own work?
    More self promotion paid for by your members who get …….. nothing.

    Reply

  8. Cutter
    June 30, 2018 @ 3:44 pm

    Has there been any developments regarding these cowboys yet?

    Reply

  9. Andrew Muir
    August 16, 2018 @ 9:00 am

    Anyone successfully appealed HMRC?

    Reply

  10. Frazer
    August 20, 2018 @ 10:51 am

    Andrew Muir, we are currently appealing with HMRC, anyone had any success as they just keep citing Acts that mean nothing to the normal person.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *