Tag: PENSION SCAM

  • DAVID VILKA’S VILE US ATTORNEY

    DAVID VILKA’S VILE US ATTORNEY

    David Vilka of Square Mile International Financial Services has exactly the sort of lawyer one would expect: a scammer’s lawyer.  Unsurprisingly, this dope can’t even spell Vilka’s victim’s name and has referred to him as “Mr Sexton” as opposed to “Mr Sefton”.  But, again, this is no surprise.

    What I must challenge, however, is the fact that Mr. Sefton has referred to this clown as a “two-bit lawyer”.  I really don’t think this is true – as he is a one-bit lawyer at best.  He has a couple of glowing client testimonials going back to 2016 and 2015 on his amateurish website, and displays no evidence of experience or expertise in the arena of British pensions (and why would he? – he’s purportedly practising US law in the US).

    One might forgive Mr. Davies for not understanding anything about UK pensions in general and pension scammers like David Vilka in particular, but to immediately jump into a firm conclusion that there has been defamation against his client shows that he hasn’t even made a one-bit attempt to understand what his client has been up to – or how many lives (like Mr Sefton’s) Vilka has ruined.

    I must admit I am used to dealing with a much better class of scammers’ lawyer.  Take DWF, for example: this large firm carelessly lost a team of 20 lawyers to rival Trowers and Hamlins a couple of years ago.  This wasn’t long after they were caught representing both sides in a case: the Insolvency Service in the winding up of Capita Oak, and Stephen Ward who handled the transfer administration in the same scheme.  But at least they dealt with the embarrassment of acting for both the poacher and the gamekeeper with a degree of dignity and elegance – a class act indeed.  DWF comes into the same league as my other legal chums – including Carter Ruck and Mishcon de Reya.  So, you can see I am more used to dealing with professional firms rather than twerps like this Mr Davies.

    Mr. Davies is referring to the UCIS investment scam, Blackmore Global, which was illegally promoted to retail investors – and which is a fraud from start to finish.

    Anyway, I have answered his absurd email below with my usual comments in bold.

    ————————————————————————————————-

    LOWELL DAVIES LLP

    July 14, 2018

    Ms. Angela Brooks,  Director of Pension Life

    Re: Defamation of Mr. David Vilka and Square Mile International

    Dear Ms. Brooks:

    I am an attorney You may well be, but you are clearly a US attorney – and that does not qualify you to deal with a matter which involves UK pensions

    and represent Mr. David Vilka Bad luck

    with respect to the defamatory article I never write defamatory articles – I only write the truth

    published on your on-line site. Specifically, this complaint relates to the misstatements and misrepresentations made on

    the following site:

    BLACKMORE GLOBAL FUND – ASSET OR BLACK HOLE?

    If I might sum up, each and every defamatory allegation with regard to Mr. Vilka and Square Mile International you assert are sourced to one disgruntled individual, Stephen Sexton, none of which allegations are supported by any evidence whatsoever.  Wrong.  Mr. Sefton is one of a number of victims of Vilka’s scams – many of which were invested in the same toxic, illegal UCIS fund as Mr. Sefton – Blackmore Global – and others were invested in other similar investment scams.  Blackmore Global is run by another scammer, Phillip Nunn, who – along with his partner in crime Patrick McCreesh – ran the cold calling and lead generation services for the Capita Oak and Henley pension scams, now under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office.

    Mr. Sexton was an unsolicited client of Mr. Vilka and Square Mile who had a substantial pension and for personal reasons of his own wanted to switch his pension and draw down sums for his personal use.  When he says “unsolicited” he means not cold called, as was usually the case with Vilka.  Vilka lied about being regulated to provide pension and investment advice, and the rest is history: Mr Sefton’s life savings were invested in two UCIS funds which were habitually promoted by Vilka: Blackmore Global and Symphony.

    The switch in pension plans resulted in what Mr. Sexton felt were unreasonable fees (None of which went to Mr. Vilka or Square Mile). I wonder if this idiot would like to explain why Mr Sefton was put into a QROPS when he was a UK resident?

    And despite the fact that Mr. Vilka was able to personally intervene and get Mr. Sexton’s monies returned less a nominal fee, Mr. Sexton continued to complain and when Square Mile attempted to make up even this nominal fee on its own part, Mr. Sexton continued to complain because he refused to sign a boilerplate settlement agreement containing a standard confidentiality agreement.  It is true that Mr Sefton did, eventually, get around 85% of his original investment back – but only after a dogged fight which was backed up by the pension trustees Integrated Capabilities.  There was no intervention by Vilka.

    In your post on the Blackmore Fund you have the temerity to cast defamatory aspersions on Mr. Vilka and Square Mile based on your “strong suspicion” and you go on to assert they must have a “strong vested interest in promoting this black hole of a fund.”  Why else would scammers such as Vilka promote such a fund?  It is a UCIS, with no independent audit to verify whether the purported assets even exist.  

    Really? What proof of that would you have?  Vilka must have had a very strong reason to promote the Blackmore Global investment fraud – why else would he have invested a further 64 victims’ pensions in this UCIS?  This was a bunch of people he scammed into transferring their pensions to a Hong Kong QROPS.

    And since you have none, we demand you remove this article and/or any reference to Mr. Vilka or Square Mile.  I have plenty of evidence thank you.  

    Let me advise you that Mr. Vilka and Square Mile, contrary to your specious aspersions, are heavily regulated as is the industry.  “Heavily”?  What you actually mean is that neither Vilka nor Square Mile is regulated for pension or investment advice – only insurance mediation.

    The Sexton matter was thoroughly investigated at the time by the appropriate regulators who found no irregularities.  You don’t know that.

    Mr. Sexton is not nor was he a perplexed victim of Mr. Vilka or Square Mile. He most certainly was – as Vilka and his accomplice John Ferguson know full well.

    His pension is worth well over half a million pounds. No it isn’t.  Did you do maths at school?

    He read and signed multiple acknowledgements before he switched pensions showing very clearly that he knew what he was investing in and the inherent risks involved.  No he didn’t.  It was never disclosed that the scammers were going to invest his pension in a UCIS fund which is illegal to be promoted to retail UK investors.

    And again, significantly, he was not cold-called. He sought out Mr. Vilka and Square Mile. Nor did Mr. Vilka or Square Mile receive any payment from the Blackmore fund or its partner firms regarding Mr. Sexton’s transaction as confirmed by the Czech National Bank which has direct access to Square Mile’s company bank accounts via an electronic data box.  Are you talking about the accounts which haven’t been updated since 2014?

    In sum, there is no bases whatsoever for the specious and actionable statements you make in your referenced post with regard to Mr. Vilka and Square Mile International.  I think you mean basis – and yes, there is a solid basis for all the statements I made in my post and not a single one of them is “specious” (although I am amazed you have even heard of the word).

    Your comments have caused Mr. Vilka and Square Mile reputational damage, among others, and you are hereby instructed to delete the post immediately.  I sincerely hope that the impact of my blog has caused Vilka and his accomplice Ferguson to turn over a new leaf and arrange to pay compensation for Mr. Sefton and all their other victims who have lost part or all of their pensions to the Square Mile scams.

    Your failure to do so will result in further damages to Mr. Vilka and Square Mile International, the accrual of further legal fees and costs, and the likelihood of litigation, all of which damages and costs we will recover from you.  Good luck with that.

    If you have any questions or concerns or require further information, please don’t hesitate to contact me directly at (206) 319-3533. I look forward to confirmation of the removal of the identified defamatory materials. Thank you in advance for resolving this matter expeditiously.  I have no questions, other than to enquire as to when your client intends to pay redress for the losses caused by his fraud.

    Best regards,

    LOWELL DAVIES LLP

    Douglas Davies Attorney at Law

    8497 Hemlock Drive

    Bainbridge Island, WA 98110

    Direct Line: (206) 319-3533

    doug@lowelldavies.com

     

  • Qualified & registered? We do not need to be – we are offshore!

    Qualified & registered? We do not need to be – we are offshore!

    Pension Life followers will know that we have been conducting a series of blog investigations – “qualified & registered?” into offshore pension companies offering financial advice for retail pension investments. Some of the data we have collated is rather worrying – the purpose of this blog is to rank the companies in order of their scores.

    The blog series certainly seems to have caused a stir among these companies with one company stating that the CII is an old company and that if you work offshore you don’t need to be registered within the UK. They state that there are other qualifications that mean you are able to give pension advice.

    At Pension Life we believe that all financial advisers should be appropriately qualified as well as registered with the institute from which they gained their qualifications.  If they are a good, trustworthy FA then why would they object to these requirements? With so many rogues out there, and the figures of financial fraud totting up to millions, an honest FA should be proud for their name to appear on all the professional institutes’ registers to which they claim they are qualified.

    We feel strongly that even if your company is based offshore, if you are working with UK pensions then you need to be qualified and registered to UK standards – and nothing less.

    The three professional institutes’ qualifications needed to be properly qualified to advise on pension planning are:

    • CII
    • CISI
    • LIBF

    and the qualifications need to be at least level 4 – if not level 6.

    More information about these qualifications can be found in our blog Qualified or not qualified? That is the question. Whilst a person can obtain a qualification in financial advice, they must obtain a certain level to be able to advise on pensions.

    Belgravia Wealth – qualified and registered? 0%

    Callaghan QROPS Spain – qualified and registered? 0/2 – 0%

    Seagate Wealth Management Spain – qualified and regulated? 0/6 – 0%

    Square Mile International Financial Services – qualified and registered? 0%

    Robusto Asset Management – qualified and registered? 0%

    Woodbrook Group – qualified and registered? 1/26 – 3.8%

    Globaleye Dubai – qualified and registered? 3/15 – 20%

    Spectrum IFA Group – qualified and registered? just 4/16 – 25%

    and this is where we see the problems with fractional scamming: these companies use their unqualified financial advisers (who are more like blood sucking salesmen) to lure the customers in, then they stick them in an entirely unnecessary insurance wrapper AND then invest the victims in whatever toxic funds pay the highest commission.

    Each ‘adviser’ – qualified or not – creams their bit off the top of the pension fund.  Generally, this means that by the time the fund arrives at its final destination, a large chunc has been taken to cover the many fees and commissions for the various parties’ ‘hard’ work.  Also, we are increasingly seeing retirement savings having two ‘wrappers’, i.e. as well as the QROPS itself, there will be an insurance bond (which will pay the slick-talking salesman up to 10% – a commission which will be carefully concealed).

    Have a look at our blog 10 essential questions to ask your IFA, this blog was compiled with the help of Pension Life members who have fallen victim to pension scammers. They agree that if they had known the right questions to ask they may have avoided losing huge chunks of their pension fund.

    Blevins Franks Spain are top dog in this investigation, they have scored highly with 17/19 of their advisers appearing on at least one of the three registers.

    Blevins Franks Spain 89.5% qualified and registered!

     

  • SEB LIFE (OR DEATH) – WILL THE CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND BRING THEM TO JUSTICE?

    SEB LIFE (OR DEATH) – WILL THE CENTRAL BANK OF IRELAND BRING THEM TO JUSTICE?

    Pension Life Blog - SEB Life - SEB life internationalOne of the hundreds of Continental Wealth Management victims stuck in a useless and expensive SEB Life International bond, and ruined by crippling investment losses, has made a detailed complaint to SEB.

    Some idiot from SEB called Orla Golden has replied – and the response is astonishing.  Below are my answers to this ridiculous rebuttal.  The complaint will now be referred to the Central Bank of Ireland – asking that SEB Life should be suspended.  I will also copy this in to the Financial Services Ombudsman.

    Let us see whether the regulator and ombudsman in Ireland will turn out to be as useless as the regulator in Gibraltar, or will actually have some teeth.  If the authorities in Ireland are any good, hopefully they will hold Conor McCarthy and Peder Nateus fully responsible for facilitating this deplorable scam.

    LETTER FROM ORLA GOLDEN TO THE CWM/SEB VICTIM IN RESPONSE TO HIS COMPLAINT (WITH MY COMMENTS IN BOLD):

    We are writing to you in response to your recently submitted complaint in respect of your insurance policy with SEB Life International Assurance Company DAC that you placed through your appointed independent financial advisor, Inter-Alliance WorldNet Insurance Agents and Advisors Ltd.

    The victims did not place any orders or instructions through Inter-Alliance.  SEB is being not only disingenuous but dishonest here.  The advisor in question was Continental Wealth Trust SL, trading as Continental Wealth Management SL (CWM) in Alicante Province, Spain.  CWM was a firm full of unqualified so-called “advisers” with a track record of scamming, cold-calling and flogging dodgy products to unsuspecting victims.  The victims appointed CWM as their advisers, and all the dealing instructions for the toxic structured notes came from CWM and not Inter-Alliance.

    SEB Life is a designated activity company which is registered under company number 218391 with the Irish Companies Registration Office and is authorised as a life insurance undertaking by the Central Bank of Ireland under number C771. 

    So, let’s see just how good a regulator the Central Bank of Ireland really is.  We must all hope it is not as hopeless, limp and corrupt as some of the other regulators.

    Pension Life Blog - SEB Life´s Complaint - SEB Life insurance Wrappers like rubbishSEB Life is permitted to distribute life insurance policies in Europe (EU) by way of a freedom of services passport issued by the Central Bank of Ireland under the Solvency II Directive 2009/138/EC as adopted into Irish law by the European Communities (Insurance and Reinsurance) Regulations 2015 (the “Solvency II Irish Regulations”).  That may be true, but these weren’t true life insurance policies: they were bogus policies designed to act as “wrappers” for dodgy, rubbish investments and to facilitate financial crime in multiple European jurisdictions – most notably Spain where such insurance/investment products have been outlawed by the Spanish Supreme Court.

    In January 2015, Inter-Alliance novated its business to Trafalgar International GmbH who became your financial advisor.  

    Not true.  Trafalgar International did not become the financial adviser.  Few, if any, of the victims had ever heard of Trafalgar until CWM collapsed in September 2017.

    Trafalgar is an independent financial advisor located in Germany

    No it isn’t – it is located in Cyprus.  Orla Golden clearly has never done Geography.

    and is authorised and entered into the register of insurance intermediaries maintained by the Chamber of Industry and Commerce (DIHK).  Trafalgar is authorised to mediate insurance policies in various EU territories including UK, Spain, Malta and France.  Yes, Trafalgar was.  But CWM wasn’t.

    SEB Life has terms of business with Trafalgar, and previously had terms of business with Inter-Alliance which was authorised by the Insurance Companies Control Service in Cyprus to mediate insurance policies in the EU; before it transferred to Trafalgar.  Continental Wealth Management (CWM) was a sub agent of Inter-Alliance

    Really?  Sub agents are illegal in Spain

    and then continued to be a sub-agent of Trafalgar. 

    No it did not.  SEB is lying.  CWM was never a sub agent of Trafalgar

    Pension Life Blog - SEB Life´s Complaint - SEB life - SEB keep changing their storyCWM is the responsibility of Trafalgar and SEB Life does not have terms of business with them. 

    So why did SEB accept dealing instructions from CWM if they had no terms of business with the firm? 

    SEB Life regularly reviews the authorisation of independent financial advisors with whom they have terms of business,

    SEB is failing to get its story straight.  CWM was not authorised – ever, for anything.  SEB may have had terms of business with both Inter-Alliance and Trafalgar, but CWM was never an authorised agent of either firm.

    however, it is the independent advisor’s responsibility to comply with their own regulatory obligations for authorisation

    And nothing to do with SEB?  So, why did SEB accept dealing instructions from CWM? 

    and their regulatory authorities have oversight responsibilities. 

    Like the Central Bank of Ireland has oversight responsibilities over SEB?  Let’s see how seriously it takes those responsibilities.

    Trafalgar, as the appointed independent financial advisor is your agent. 

    No it isn’t, and wasn’t.  Trafalgar was not an IFA firm, it was a network. 

    Any policy related intermediary commission was paid directly to Trafalgar (formerly Inter-Alliance), with whom SEB Life has terms of business.

    So why was SEB paying intermediary commission at all to CWM which was not regulated at all for anything – not pet insurance, not bicycle insurance, nothing.  It matters not to whom the commission was paid, the products were sold by an unregulated firm (CWM) and SEB should never have accepted the business – let alone ever paid commission (irrespective of to whom this commission was paid).

    As your agent, Trafalgar must handle your complaint in accordance with their agent and regulatory responsibilities. 

    Trafalgar was never the victims’ agent.

    In addition, the pre-sales advising process occurs between you as the policyholder and your appointed agent.

    Trafalgar was never the appointed agent.  Trafalgar did not provide the advice; Trafalgar did not place the dealing instructions; Trafalgar did not meet the clients.

    This process identifies the customer’s needs, based on the information provided by the policyholder(s)

    How would SEB know?  Did they ever check the fact finds or make any attempt to ascertain the victims’ attitude to risk?  No, of course they didn’t

    Pension Life Blog - SEB Life´s Complaint - plummeting toxic structured notes

    and recommends the insurance product which best suits the customer’s objectives and needs. 

    This is a ludicrous comment to make.  Not one single victim needed a bogus life assurance product – they were all, 100% mis-sold purely for the fat commissions paid by SEB. 

    SEB Life is not party to this pre-sales advising process and the discussions that occur between a policyholder and their appointed independent financial adviser as to their risk profile and the assets that will fulfill the investment needs and objectives.

    Correct.  But SEB ought to have noticed, over a period of several consecutive years, the inexorable losses from the toxic structured notes which repeatedly failed – and the dealing instructions for which (submitted by CWM and accepted by SEB) bore forged client signatures.  SEB may not have been party to the pre-scamming advice con, but they should certainly have taken action when the results of this clear fraud started to become obvious.

    SEB Life does not offer any investment advice, and this is clearly stated in the declaration section of the application form that we ensure is signed by the customer. 

    And damn good job too.  Most victims would probably trust a convicted thief rather than SEB.  The declaration section of the application form may make it clear that SEB does not offer investment advice, but the annual statements also make it clear that SEB can do maths.  And that basic maths demonstrated that hundreds of policyholders’ funds were being routinely destroyed.

    Our literature states that the amounts invested in the Units of the Fund in the contract are not guaranteed but are subject to fluctuations in value depending, in particular, on the performance of financial markets. 

    There is fluctuation, and then there is total destruction.  Fluctuation goes up and down.  Destruction just goes down.  Did not a single half-wit at SEB notice the difference over a period of seven years?

    The return on investment is not in SEB Life’s control and past performance is not an indicator of the future performance of any asset. 

    So, if Bloodstone Building in Dublin caught fire, would the blind, deaf and dumb idiots at SEB just sit there, shrug their shoulders and say “a fire in the building is not within our control – we aren’t firefighters.  And we won’t even bother using the fire extinguishers or calling the fire brigade.  We’ll just sit here and watch the building get destroyed and burn to death ourselves?”Pension Life Blog - SEB Life´s Complaint -

    SEB also request that a one-page “Statement of Understanding” is signed by a policyholder where an investment request is received in relation to a non-standard asset.

    Really?  Who told Orla Golden that?  The Statement of Understanding Fairy?  This simply is not true.

    Pension Life Blog - SEB Life´s Complaint -This is to confirm that the policyholder has read and understood the potential financial, market and liquidity risks associated with the asset before proceeding. 

    None of the victims understood the assets which SEB was permitting the scammers at CWM to churn; none of the victims realised or understood what structured notes; none of the victims knew that structured notes were for professional investors only and not for retail investors; none of the victims knew that they stood to lose part or all of their investment (as most did); none of the victims realised that SEB would just sit there and let the repeated losses keep happening as the unlicensed, unqualified scammers at CWM kept scamming away for seven years.

    Policyholders are able to request that their policy be linked to assets that are within the company’s permissible asset list.  The investments have been executed by SEB Life on the basis of written instructions submitted to SEB Life that were signed by you as the policyholder

    No they weren’t – the signatures were forged

    or your appointed investment advisor. 

    Meaning the unqualified, unlicensed scammers at CWM who did not have an investment license – let alone an insurance license.

    SEB Life relief upon and implemented those instructions in good faith and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the policy. 

    There was nothing good about SEB’s “faith”.  This particular victim – whose complaint has not been upheld by SEB – suffered the following losses between 2009 and 2015:

    12 toxic, professional-investor-only structured notes from Nomura, RBC, Commerzbank, Leonteq and BNP Paribas:

    Lost a total of 271,539 EUR

    Investment in the Quadris Teak UCIS fund:

    Lost 100,000 GBP

    TOTAL LOSS IN SIX YEARS: 371,539 EUR

    Didn’t SEB notice?  Didn’t SEB care?  Didn’t SEB do anything for seven years? 

    The answer, of course, is a resounding no.  The lazy, callous, greedy, negligent did nothing except sit there and watch this victim’s life savings be destroyed by the scammers.

    With regard to your allegations of regulatory breaches and fraud committed on your policy, SEB Life is unable to comment on such allegations and these must be discussed with your appointed financial advisor Trafalgar directly. 

    I have no doubt that SEB’s lawyers will have advised them to keep their mouths shut on this one and to try to deflect the blame onto Trafalgar.  This is one of the things I hate about lawyers – even when they know their dirty clients are guilty they will still defend them to the hilt.  As long as they keep billing, the lawyers won’t care how many lives their negligent and culpable clients ruin.

    In these circumstances, you may wish to seek independent financial advice

    I wonder what sort of “adviser” SEB have in mind?  Scammers like CWM?

    and/or legal advice regarding your engagements with your appointed financial adviser. 

    And I wonder what sort of law firm SEB would recommend?  A dodgy firm like SEB’s own lawyers who are happy to make money out of defending the indefensible?

  • Woodbrook Group – qualified and registered?

    Pension life blog - woodbrook group - qualified and registered?

    If you have been following Pension Life´s blogs, you will know that we have been conducting a series of investigations into qualified and registered financial advisers in various firms. Today is Woodbrook Group – qualified and registered?  See question 5 on our blog about the ten essential questions to ask any advisory firm you are considering using:

    10 essential questions to ask an IFA

    IFAs and their clients are invited to add to it, correct it, improve it. Here’s a link to the three registers if you want to double check:

    http://www.cii.co.uk/web/app/membersearch/MemberSearch.aspx

    https://www.cisi.org/cisiweb2/cisi-website/join-us/cisi-member-directory

    https://www.libf.ac.uk/members-and-alumni/sps-and-cpd-register – Claim to a DipFA

    Here’s what Woodbrook Group say about themselves:

    “Woodbrook Group is an international firm of financial advisors. We are proud to be independent as we are not owned by any financial institution or life insurance company. This makes us different from the majority of financial advisory companies which means we offer you unbiased and impartial advice.

    Pension life blog - Woodbrook Group - qualified and registered? Woodbrook Group Woodbrook

    Every individual has unique dynamics, goals and attitude to risk. Our team of highly experienced financial consultants can help you to identify your personal needs and devise professional solutions and services that are customized to your unique situation, objectives and goals.

    Woodbrook Group is licensed to provide the investment services of investment advice.”

    Woodbrook Group advisers – qualified and registered?

    Despite stating the company operates in 30 different countries, I was unable to find any list detailing the members of their advisory team. They do, however, state that Woodbrook Group is authorised and regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (No: 297/16) and subject to the requirements of the EU’s Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID).

    I found three names connected to this company via their website media page: Michael Doherty, who states he is the CEO; Andrew Heath, who is listed as office manager in Spain; Mark Slevin, listed for Cyprus office.

    Michael Doherty – CEO – no financial qualifications listed – two people called Michael Doherty appear on the CII register with DipPFS so there´s a possibility he could be one of them – although I doubt it as one is based in Manchester and the other in Chester:

    http://www.cii.co.uk/web/app/membersearch/MemberSearch.aspx?endstem=1&q=n&n=michael+doherty&c=&ch=0&p=0

    Andrew Heath – Country Manager Spain – spent the last 15 years providing Financial Offshore solutions however there is no mention of ANY financial qualifications

    Mark Slevin – Regional Manager – Cyprus office – not listed on any of the three registers

    However, through Linkedin, I have found further employees who are listed as purportedly working for Woodbrook Group.

    I will, therefore, use this list for Woodbrook Group “advisers” – qualified and registered.  However, the biggest concern about Woodbrook is that it is promoting structured products.  Victims of the Continental Wealth Management scam will undoubtedly join in the warning about any adviser that uses structured notes as these are for professional investors only and are very risky.  Of course, structured note providers do pay handsome introduction commissions of up to 8% (for the fraudulent Leonteq ones) – and that is one compelling reason to avoid any advisory firms which use these products.

    https://www.linkedin.com/search/results/people/?facetCurrentCompany=%5B%226237866%22%5D

    Woodbrook Group advisers – qualified and registered? Employee list:

    Hamaza Ali Kahn – Business Development Manager – Masters degree in Marketing Management no financial qualifications

    Michael Allen MBA – Senior Business Development Manager – claims he advises in UK Pensions Transfer (QROPS) – No mention of any financial qualifications only business qualifications

     

    Bálint Andrea – Partner Hungary and Slovakia – qualifications claimed – The Open University Postgraduate Finance, General

    Robert Bennett – Senior Wealth Manager – claims CII but only to level 3 (need level 4 plus for Pension advice)

    Graeme Blyth – Senior Consultant – Marbella – previous position include Wealth Manager – No mention of any financial qualifications

    Sławomir Boguta – Financial ial Consultant Warsaw – qualifications claimed MBA, Marketing Management – No financial qualifications claimed

    Andrew Broadband – Financial coordinator – Education states ‘some college’ no mention of any financial qualifications

    Christina Doherty – Director – No financial qualifications claimed

    Florin Dragan – Financial Consultant – qualifications claimed BBA, work history in sales -No financial qualifications claimed

    Mark Dudgeon – Wealth Manager Cyprus – claims CISI – DOES NOT APPEAR ON THE REGISTER

    Constantinos Fieros – Independent Financial Adviser – claims an MBA but no financial qualifications

    Steven A Green – Financial Consultant palm area – qualifications claimed: Chartered Institute of House – No mention of any financial qualifications

    Bert Grobler CISI – Financial Consultant – claims a qualification in CISI – Does appear on the register as Gysbert Grobler ACSI – WELL DONE Bert!

    Terry Heath – Business Development Manager – claims qualifications in science and geography, no mention of financial qualifications

    Adel Jones – Financial Consultant Hungry – specialities life savings, pensions… – No financial qualifications claimed

    Tomas Koolhaas CISI  – Business Development Lead CEE – claims a Masters Degree,
    University of Amsterdam Finance and Financial Management Services and CISI – DOES NOT APPEAR ON THE CISI REGISTER

    Josh Melcher  – Senior Financial Consultant Hungary – Strong finance professional graduated from Algonquin College, no mention of official financial qualifications

    Senan Mc Gonigle FCA – Country Director Cyprus – claims FCA – was unable to check claim through the website: https://www.charteredaccountants.ie

    Maria Milaj – Group Compliance Officer, Cyprus – previous positions include Pensions Expert – qualifications claimed Budapest Business School – Finance and Accounting.

    James Peoples – Business Development – MSC in Social sciences NO financial qualifications

    Jason Truesdale – Country Manager Hungary, Slovakia and Croatia – No financial qualifications claimed

     

    Jacob Walters -Senior Partner (Europe) & Head of UK pension transfer Division – claims a host of financial qualifications including CISI – DOES NOT APPEAR ON CISI REGISTER

    Omer Zahid – Business Development Manager – No mention of any financial qualifications

     

     

    Woodbrook Group advisers – qualified and registerered. Just 1/26

     

  • Globaleye Dubai – advisers qualified and registered?

    Globaleye Dubai – advisers qualified and registered?

    Globaleye dubai - qualified and registered?If you have been following Pension Life´s blogs, you will know that we have been conducting a series of investigations into qualified and registered financial advisers in various firms. Today: are Globaleye Dubai’s advisers qualified and registered?

    IFAs and their clients are invited to add to it, correct it, improve it. Here’s a link to the three registers if you want to double check:

    http://www.cii.co.uk/web/app/membersearch/MemberSearch.aspx

    https://www.cisi.org/cisiweb2/cisi-website/join-us/cisi-member-directory

    https://www.libf.ac.uk/members-and-alumni/sps-and-cpd-register – Claim to a DipFA

    Please note that this data is correct as of 9am 04/07/2018

    Globaleye Dubai – qualified and registered? Team list:

    Tim Searle – Chairman – Claims CII – appears on the register – United Arab Emirates International

    Bart Kendall – Head of Wealth Management – Claims CII and CISI qualifications – does NOT appear on EITHER register

    Graham Pascal – Vice President – Claims CII – does NOT appear on the register

    Benjamin Searle – Operations Manager – No claims to any qualifications and not on any list

    Rupert Searle – Marketing Manager – Claims CII – does NOT appear on the CII register

    Kapil Dev Sharma – Senior Wealth Manager – Claims CII – does NOT appear on the register

    Tony Ashton – Senior Wealth Manager, Client Services – Claims CII membership – does NOT appear on the register

    Lourens Oberholzer – Senior Wealth Manager – Does not state any qualification – DOES appear on the CISI register with an ACSI

    Blair Wilson – Wealth Manager – Does not state any qualification – DOES appear on the CII register

    David Ellis – Wealth Manager – Does not state any qualification – does NOT appear on any register

    Duncan Eastwood – Wealth Manager – Claims CII – does NOT appear on the register

    Raju Butaney – Wealth Manager – Does not state any qualification – does NOT appear on any register

    Maurice Cassan – Wealth Manager –  Does not state any qualification – does NOT appear on any register

    Sameer Alam – Wealth Manager – states he has an MBA, no mention of Financial qualifications – does NOT appear on any register

    Yolan Ebert – Wealth Manager – Claims CII qualification – does NOT appear on the register

    James Marks – Senior Wealth Manager – Claims a host of CII qualifications – does NOT appear on the register

    Globaleye Dubai – qualified and registered? 3/15

    Just 20% qualified and registered!

    Globaleye Dubai – qualified and registered? 80% of staff unregistered!

     

     

  • FNB International Trustees – Guernsey

    FNB International Trustees – Guernsey

    Pension Life Blog - FNB International Trustees Guernsey - Manita Khuller - standing up for justice

    FNB International Trustees Guernsey has been caught facilitating financial crime.  With their pants firmly around their ankles, they are now trying to “defend” their actions using law firm Carey Olsen and are threatening the victim of this crime with adverse costs.  And this is what we always find so hard to comprehend: a trustee firm has been caught clearly acting negligently and complicit in a scam, and yet they are now attacking their own member for exposing the trustee’s negligence and pursuing the victim for damages.  Let us hope we can trust in the judge to ensure FNB International acknowledges the difference between right and wrong: the firm took business from unregulated scammers and without question that was wrong.

    We must also bear in mind that there is a regulator in Guernsey, and if he is sober and awake, we might even mention this matter to him and see if he is interested in doing a wee bit of regulating.

    Pension Life Blog - FNB International Trustees GuernseyAnd thus it always is: the perpetrators of financial scams fight back hard against their victims with fancy, overpaid lawyers (in fact, one pension scam victim calls them “bloodsuckers”).  In my view, these lawyers are just as bad as their guilty clients.  Any self-respecting lawyer ought to refuse to represent those who facilitate scams which ruin innocent victims.  And any self-respecting judge should see through such obfuscation tactics in court.

    In a nutshell, FNB International Trustees (Guernsey – one of the World’s worst jurisdictions for accepting dodgy business from unlicensed scammers) permitted, and even encouraged, irresponsible investments which only served to earn the scammers commissions at the expense of the investor/member.

    The victim, Manita Khuller, had started with a final salary pension of £331,000.  In 2011, while living in Thailand, she was advised to transfer the pension to a QROPS by unregulated scammers – Professional Portfolio International Ltd (PPI).  Her adviser was Gary Bradford and he was operating illegally in Thailand and is now under criminal investigation by the Economic Crime Division of the SEC in Thailand.  Bradford and his accomplice Eric Jordan could each face up to five years in jail.

    The transfer of Ms Khuller’s valuable Unilever final salary scheme was accepted by Guernsey-based FNB International Trustees.  The firm claims to have “over 40 years pedigree in the provision of fiduciary services, with the expertise to meet your every need”.  So, this so-called pedigree and expertise ought to have started with:

    • Bearing in mind our aim is to meet your every need, is your adviser regulated?  (Because if he isn’t, we won’t accept the transfer or any investment instructions).

    FNB either established that PPI was not regulated – and didn’t care, accepting the business anyway – or they didn’t bother to check in the first place.  Whichever way round it was, FNB was clearly negligent.  The firm should have checked on PPI’s regulation, and when it discovered that FNB was unregulated, it should have refused the transfer and insisted it would only accept the transfer if Ms Khuller was represented by a regulated adviser.

    FNB International Trustees then accepted investment instructions from unregulated PPI to purchase a Skandia insurance bond.  These so-called “single-premium bonds” serve no purpose other than to pay the scammers high commissions; tie the victim into an early-exit-penalty period of between five and ten years; and cause a serious drag on the fund with the crippling quarterly “management” charges.  These bond providers never do any actual “managing”, and these charges are merely their way of clawing back the commission paid to the scammers.

    It is now widely accepted that such insurance bonds should never be used for pensions: a pension is a wrapper – you don’t need or want a second, unnecessary wrapper.  Plus, it makes no sense to tie a pension saver into any arrangement for any length of time, since all members have a right to a transfer any time they want.  In fact, in Spain, the Supreme Court has ruled such insurance bonds illegal and invalid if used for the purposes of holding single-premium investments – and we all hope this policy will be adopted across Europe and beyond.

    FNB International Trustees then allowed Ms Khuller’s entire fund to be invested in three UCIS funds:

    50% LM (Australian Property Fund)

    25% Mansion Student Accommodation

    25% Prestige Asset Management (Agricultural Finance)

    FNB accepted investment dealing instructions from the unlicensed PPI scammers, and instead of rejecting these clearly irresponsible and inappropriate investments, FNB went ahead and used Ms Khuller’s pension money to purchase these three hopeless, high-risk, illiquid, speculative and entirely unsuitable funds.

    Let us be clear: FNB is not any old dodgy trustee in a corrupt jurisdiction where the regulator, ombudsman and financial crime unit all play golf and quaff champagne with the perpetrators of financial crime.  The firm holds itself out to be a responsible, professional and competent pension trustee.  The so-called “key” people have, between them, many years of purported experience in financial services, trusts, banking and investments.

    And yet this firm allowed Ms Khuller’s life savings to be invested in just three high-risk UCIS funds – inside a pointless insurance bond – all at the behest of an unregulated scammer – now under criminal investigation by the SEC in Thailand.

    The rest is history: the LM and Mansion funds went “pop” (as many UCIS funds do).  Ms Khuller lost £170k (at least).  Obviously, she now wants out of the unnecessary insurance bond, and as far away as possible from the  pension trustee, FNB International who so badly betrayed her trust and neglected their own fiduciary duties.

    So, Ms Khuller – quite rightly – took FNB International Trustees to court in Guernsey.  She represented herself in court – something that takes guts and conviction – armed only with an expert report on FNB’s failures.  FNB tried to wriggle out of taking responsibility for the consequences of their negligence by using Carey Olsen Solicitors – who tried to claim that some of the information within the expert report went “way beyond the remit of the action” and was not relevant to the case. They said that “any expert report should be limited to mathematical quantification of loss”.

    I am pleased that Carey Olsen acknowledges the importance of quantifying Ms Khuller’s loss.  So, I have done the calculation for them:

    • Original transfer value = £331,000
    • Lack of reasonable growth over seven years @ 4% a year = £121,996
    • Reasonable expectation of today’s value of fund (had the trustee done it’s job properly) = £435,573
    • Loss = £435,573 – FNB’s transfer value

    Let us say, for simplicity’s and argument’s sake, that Ms Khuller’s transfer out value is half what it was when she started – i.e. £165,500.  Then the loss is £270,073.  See?  Simples.  Who needs an expert witness?  Or even a calculator – because I’ve already done the maths.  I jolly well hope that both FNB and Carey Olsen are grateful.

    However, this is the short and simple version of the story, but there is another very important dimension.  By giving up a valuable final salary pension, Ms Khuller has surrendered a promise to pay her a certain retirement income for life.  Therefore, my calculation above does not take into account the additional loss arising from the fact that even without the catastrophic investment failures, she would have needed a fund of approaching £800,000 to match the income she would have had if she had remained with the original scheme.

    FNB doesn’t need to pay any over-priced lawyers because the solution to this case is simple: the firm behaves reasonably, honourably and responsibly; admits liability and makes a claim on its professional indemnity insurance.  It won’t cost the firm a penny.  And I will even write a series of nice blogs about FNB International Trustees saying what nice chaps they all are.

    Of course, the real “fly in the ointment” will be Carey Olsen as this law firm will not want to give up the prospects of a nice juicy bunch of billables.  The last thing they will want is an easy, amicable, quick and cheap resolution to this matter.  They will probably advise their client to fight the case to the death and try to make out that Ms Khuller’s crippling losses are somehow her own fault.

    So, if I were to get the opportunity to discuss this dilemma with the lovely guys at FNB, I would point out that they could gain a significant commercial advantage over their competitors Concept Trustees in Guernsey.  Concept was flogging the toxic, high-risk, illiquid EEA Life Settlements UCIS fund to hundreds of low-risk, retail investors and permitting unlicensed Premier Pension Solutions to advise the victims.  Concept has never paid any redress to it’s victims – so FNB could come out a real hero (as opposed to a villain).

    Settling this matter with dignity and honour could, in fact, prove that FNB International Trustees is capable of meeting Ms Khuller’s every need.

  • FAST PENSIONS – SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT – STATIONARY REGULATORS

    FAST PENSIONS – SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT – STATIONARY REGULATORS

    Fast Pensions – Slow Law Enforcement – Stationary Regulators – same old, same old.  Looks like the embarrassment of our hopeless, lazy and impotent regulators and limp law enforcement when it comes to financial crime has struck yet another blow for justice and another goal for the scammers in this case the Moats of Fast Pensions.

    Pension Life Blog - FAST PENSIONS - SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT - STATIONARY REGULATORS - The Moats

    his case the Moats of Fast Pensions.

    Pension Life Blog - The Moats - FAST PENSIONS - SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT - STATIONARY REGULATORSThe Fast Pensions scam couldn’t have been much more obvious: a known scammer – Peter Moat of Blu Debt Management (one of the promoters of the Ark Pension scam and associate of Stephen Ward) had set up a very clumsy pension liberation scam.  It was loosely modeled on Ward’s Ark scam, but as Moat was clearly nowhere near as intelligent and crafty as Ward, it was screamingly obvious from square one that it was an outright fraud.

    In fact, if you think about how the Moats got this scam got off the ground, it was the usual routine:

    • HMRC registered 15 occupations pension schemes (whereas with Ark it was 14)
    • The sponsoring employer had never traded, nor had any prospect of ever trading or employing anyone
    • The trustee firm, FP Scheme Trustees, had a sole director: Jane Wright. A young woman who worked as Peter Moat’s bookkeeper – with no experience in being a pension trustee and was only paid to be a “stooge” to keep Peter Moat’s name out of the scheme
    • Peter Moat’s main business was loans – personal and bridging

    HMRC and the Pensions Regulator did nothing to check this obvious scam out.  All the might of Britain’s regulators and law enforcement stood by while, courtesy of the Moats, more than 400 people were defrauded out of their life savings – FAST PENSIONS – SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT – STATIONARY REGULATORS.

    Between November 2016 and May 2017, there were 18 complaints by Fast Pensions victims to the Pensions Ombudsman.  All 18 were upheld.  It was clear from the complaints and the Ombudsman’s determinations that the scheme was a scam and that the Moats, Peter and his wife Sara, were out and out fraudsters.

    Pension Life Blog - The Moats - FAST PENSIONS - SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT - STATIONARY REGULATORSStill, neither the regulators nor law enforcement agencies lifted a finger to stop the Moats: FAST PENSIONS – SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT – STATIONARY REGULATORS, is the basis of this case.

    The Moats remain living in luxury in their palatial villa in Javea on the Costa Blanca – driving around in their flash cars.  What paid for this gorgeous lifestyle was £millions stolen from innocent, hard-working British citizens – while the callous, lazy, impotent regulators and law-enforcement agencies stood by and watched.  

    As the great parliamentarian Edmund Burke said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”  In my humble view, what is even worse is for hopeless and uncaring men to do worse than nothing: to pretend to be good men.

    On this sad and disgusting topic, I will write no more – but leave this blog’s words to the son of one of the victims who attended the High Court hearing in the matter of the winding up petition by the Insolvency Service against Peter and Sara Moat, Fast Pensions, FP Scheme Trustees, the 15 bogus occupational pension schemes and Moat’s various loan companies.

    Fast Pensions Victim
    Vs
    Fast Pensions Ltd.

    Claimant: Fast Pensions Victim
    (Fast Pensions Ltd DM1 Scheme member)
    Defendant:
    Fast Pensions Ltd

    Manchester Court of Justice
    Date: 30th May 2018 Time: 14:00.
    Case Reference: Claim No XXXX of 2018.

    Case:

    In 2012 my father had a personal pension fund which had accumulated to over £XXXX as a result of him working hard and saving over a number of years.

    In September of that year my father took a “cold call” from a gentleman representing a
    consultancy firm called Capital Consulting. He was informed that by transferring his pension funds from the existing scheme to another pension scheme he would benefit in as much that he could withdraw 25% of his pension fund (tax-free) on the transfer and sign up to a Five-Year Fixed
    Plan giving my father a fixed 5% bonus each year over the 5 years, and at the end of the 5
    years could have a payout without any fixed penalties.

    My father thought through this proposal, as there had been and still were serious issues with the Equitable regarding pension schemes, so my father arranged to have a home visit from Capital Consulting.

    He listened to their proposals and then decided to accept the proposal.  My father signed into the DM1 Retirement Plan on the 4th. October 2012, the administrators were to be AC. Management & Administration Ltd, who at that time were based in Gorseinon, South Wales. A sum of over £XXXX was then transferred into the ACMA Client Account of Barclays Bank Cardiff.

    On the 26th October 2012 my father received a letter from a Jane Wright (Pension
    Processor) stating that the 5 Year Plan had now started with Fast Pensions.  Soon after signing up to the scheme some of the initial promises of the scheme did not materialise so my father made numerous phone calls on the one phone no. that was available 08453730569 which would transfer onto answerphone on most occasions.

    My father’s main concern related to the following. “We have just recently developed a client
    login area and this should be available shortly. This will enable you to track your pension.”

    My father phoned regarding this facility and on the few occasions he managed to receive an
    answer he spoke to Jane Wright who stated that there was IT issues but it would be up and
    running shortly. My father is still waiting.

    My father received annual statements for his DMI Retirement Plan for 2013/2014/2015.
    My father did not contact Fast Pensions Ltd again until June 2015, when he applied
    for a Flexi Drawdown Payment of £XXXX. The drawdown application was made on the 20th
    June 2015. Legislation had been introduced in April 2015, whereby a member of a pension
    scheme had the option of using this legislation to withdraw an amount from their pension
    fund, so my father took up this option from Fast Pensions.

    The drawdown application was made on the 20th June 2015. It was eventually paid out as
    two payments. The first payment of £XXXX was paid in October 2015 as an interim payment
    and the balance was paid on the 9th November 2015.

    There are number of reasons why this took so long and for the money to be received. The
    main reason was the total lack of communication from Fast Pensions.

    Fast Pensions Ltd had, as already mentioned, one contact number which was an 0845
    number which would obviously cost more than the standard rate to call often to be met by
    an answering machine, and incidentally cost my father a large amount of money. When my
    father did manage to succeed, it was from a Paul Bennett (Pension Administrator) who was
    so unhelpful and uncooperative towards my father’s questions. He would often be met with
    “I will have to speak to my manager Mr Gary Henderson and get him to come back to you”

    During these months I personally spoke to Paul Bennett as he would often ignore calls from
    my father’s mobile and found if I called from a withheld number he would accept the call. I
    personally found Mr Bennett to be constantly unable to answer questions often just finding
    excuses to the questions in which he was presented with. Mr Bennett on one occasion told
    me he could not speak to me as I was not the policy holder. Mr Bennett was provided with a
    letter of authority from my father to enable me to act on his behalf.

    Owing to the lack of responses, my father asked Paul Bennett for Mr Henderson’s email or
    telephone number but was told” it was not company policy to issues clients with direct
    contact details.”

    Throughout the period of time dealing with Mr Bennett there would be long delays between
    his emails and responses so again adding to a further delay of dealing with the drawdown
    application.

    My father was asked to return the completed application forms to the registered address in
    London (being a “virtual address”). He duly sent the paperwork to this address to have it
    returned to sender, so my father sent it again, this time by recorded delivery which was also
    returned by the Royal Mail stating “no one is available to sign for it”. My father actually
    spoke to Head of Operations at the Westminster sorting office to verify this. Mr. Bennett on
    the rare occasion my father actually spoke to him, stated there had been problems but had
    now been rectified. It certainly had not.

    This was further evidence of a total breakdown of communication and excuses for not
    dealing with my father’s request. Eventually Mr Bennett responded to this issue and issued
    the forms again which were this time sent by e-mail. My father was then informed by Mr
    Bennett that he had missed the deadline for the end of August pay run and he would not
    receive it that month. The delays were simply down to lack of cooperation and
    communication from Mr Bennett and Fast Pensions Ltd. At this point Fast Pensions paid an
    interim payment of £XXXX as my father had repeatedly told Paul Bennett that he was
    struggling financially.

    He was later quoted by Mr Bennett that the balance of the drawdown payment would reach
    his account by 30th September 2015, not surprisingly this did not happen. He did although
    receive a payment slip with the current amounts of the drawdown, £XXXX gross and
    £XXXX net. My father received the notification from the HMRC that Fast Pensions Ltd had
    informed them of the payment, which my father finally received in full as already mentioned
    by the 9thNovember 2015. I will point out at this time, that this transaction to the HMRC will
    have been completed with an RTI. Note what occurs when Fast Pensions try to send the RTI
    for the second drawdown payment.

    On several occasions my father requested an explanation and apology for the total lack of
    communication, payment delays, mal-administration, and mismanagement from Fast
    Pensions Ltd. This was never received.

    Owing to the serious issues concerning Fast Pensions my father decided to seek advice from
    an independent regulated Financial Advisor. They highlighted various issues, including the
    way the transfer from the Equitable to Fast Pensions had been organised.

    At this time my father requested the paperwork from both Fast Pensions Ltd and the
    Equitable Life regarding the transfer of funds. One of the main questions which came out of
    the independent advice and requested from Fast Pensions Ltd was details of the pension
    fund and the fund portfolio. My father never received this information.

    Over the previous few months the worry, financial distress and health issues caused by Fast
    Pensions Ltd was having an effect on my father, so he took a break before he applied for his
    next drawdown payment.

    On the 29th January 2016 my father contacted Fast Pensions Ltd to apply for his next
    drawdown. He requested the payment after the 5th April 2016.  This was to give Fast Pensions
    enough time to process the application and fall into the 2016/2017 tax year.

    At this point we were aware of Fast Pensions Ltd being under investigation by South Wales
    Fraud Squad. My father had provided South Wales Fraud Squad with several pieces of
    evidence in relation to his dealings with Fast Pensions Ltd.

    In February 2016 my father received several emails from Paul Bennet quoting that the
    request was received and would be processed, but it was becoming evident that from the
    end of February 2016, there was no answer from Fast Pensions Ltd and all communication
    ceased. No emails or telephone calls were received from Mr Bennett from the end of
    February 2016. On 23rd March 2016, my father received an email from DC. Andy Holmes of
    the Economic Crime Unit who informed my father that Paul Bennett had terminated all links
    with Fast Pensions Ltd and had left at the end of February 2016.

    Mr. Bennett had quoted on his LinkedIn profile that he was employed by a company called
    Jackson Wood from August 2014 until February 2016. (No mention of Fast Pensions) I then
    decided to enquire about Jackson Wood Ltd and found a familiar name as the Director. Mr
    Ian Stuart Chapman, who is also the director of

    – Umbrella Loans. (07331044)
    – Blu Financial Services Ltd. (05912973)
    – Blu Debt Management (06699233)

    My father was later made aware by DC Andy Holmes (Economic Crime Unit, Wales) that
    Paul Bennett had been helping with enquiries in relation to Fast Pensions Ltd. He also
    informed my father that Paul Bennet had left Fast Pensions Ltd without informing him.
    From the period of Paul Bennet ceasing communication at the end of February my
    father could not contact anyone at Fast Pensions.

    My father, at a later date checked Mr Bennett’s profile and noted that he had
    moved to a company called Silverene Administration of 50, Chorley Road, Bolton, BL1
    4AP, (company no 09088060). He has again moved on and is now employed by a
    company called Cranfords, Pension Administrators.

    The Director of Silverene Administration Ltd is a Merle Oper who was also the founder
    of Umbrella Loans Ltd from 2010-April 2014.

    Mr Bennett provided my father with an email to contact Sara Moat
    (sara.moat@blupropertygroup.com) surprisingly Sara Moat never replied to any of my
    father’s emails.

    My father did not receive any communication from Fast Pensions from February 2016
    until May 2016. This was when he received a letter from Sara Moat informing my father
    that Paul Bennett had left Fast Pensions (it had only taken three months for Fast
    Pensions to mention this)) and due to his departure, they had experienced difficulties
    and delays. Sara Grace Moat quoted in this letter that the ongoing request had been
    sent to payroll department, and my father would receive confirmation of this within 14
    days. My father is still waiting for that confirmation.

    It was now becoming a very serious situation as all communication with Fast Pensions had
    ceased and this was continuing to cause my father further stress, financial difficulties, and
    ongoing health issues.

    “If you believe that a firm has promoted or sold you a UCIS that is not suitable for you,
    sold a UCIS to you unlawfully or without fully explaining the risks, you should make a
    complaint to the firm involved”. (www.fca.org.uk)

    Regarding the above reference from the FCA website, the amount of times me and
    my father have complained about the conduct of Fast Pensions – it is all recorded and has
    also being made available to those requesting it, i.e. Economic Crime Unit, Serious Fraud
    Office and others.

    After several requests for information on my father’s investment, including the
    investment portfolio, and an up to date statement, I do believe that the reason you have
    not made it available, is that it was put into a UCIS.

    Therefore, I find myself alongside my father reading peoples experiences, comments
    and consequences resulting from Fast Pensions. Not to mention the contact with the
    Serious Fraud Unit and Economic Crime Unit who are all actively investigating Fast
    Pensions. Hence the reason why my father and I openly and transparently discuss all
    emails to them relating to Fast Pensions Limited.

    Angie Brooks’ is also against the miss-selling of Pension Schemes which are sold by
    introducers or untrustworthy IFA’s. In the case of my father was ill-informed and misled as
    to the DM1 pension scheme and the fact is being an unregulated scheme, of which you
    have admitted to in your IDRP response. I am only too aware of the risks with
    unregulated schemes after several hours of research, because of my father’s experience
    with Fast Pensions Ltd.

    I am also aware of the relationship Angie Brooks has with the Pension Regulator, HMRC,
    Insolvency Services and the FCA, and the assistance my father is giving to the Serious
    Fraud Office. At this moment in time Fast Pensions Ltd and its Trustees have stated
    nothing to defend or deny these comments, in fact they are simply adding to the negative
    experiences the members are having with Fast Pensions.

    The appellant’s statement descibed above is followed by more than 30,000 words describing the catalog of lies and obfuscation by the Moats and their associates, and the deterioration in his vicim’s health.  During this whole time, there were no arrests and no action by the regulators – FAST PENSIONS – SLOW LAW ENFORCEMENT – STATIONARY REGULATORS – disgusting all round!

    The Insolvency Service has now, finally, placed the various entities involved into liquidation.  It remains to be seen whether any money will ever be traced and recovered from this scam.

     

     

  • Trussed by Dolphin Trust?

    Pension Life Blog - Trussed by Dolphin Trust? - Dolphin Turust - trafalgar multi asset fundI’ve been very concerned about Dolphin Trust GmbH for some time.  There’s an awful lot of pension money being loaned to this company – and I don’t get to hear of many (in fact any) people who have had their loans repaid.  That doesn’t mean they haven’t been repaid – it just means I haven’t heard about it.

    The things that bothers me about Dolphin Trust are:

    1. There are no audited accounts available
    2. Dolphin has been used by an awful lot of pension and investment scammers – including Stephen Ward in the London Quantum pension scam (now in the hands of Dalriada Trustees)
    3. “Introducers” get paid eye-watering commissions of up to 25%
    4. If the assets and projects are so good, why pay private lenders 10% interest (on top of the 25% commission) – why not just go to the bank?
    5. I have recently heard that Dolphin and some of their dodgy “introducers” are now trying to convince lenders to take their loans back in the form of shares in the company

    But the biggest concern I have is that Dolphin Trust formed a major part of the underlying investments in the Trafalgar Multi-Asset Fund scam – run by XXXX XXXX of Global Partners Limited and STM Fidecs in Gibraltar.  This fund is now being wound up by Stephen Doran, of Doran + Minehane.

    The Trafalgar Multi-Asset Fund and XXXX XXXX  are currently under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office.  Ironically, Justin Caffrey of Harbour Pensions once told me that XXXX came to see him to try to flog the obviously dodgy Trafalgar fund.  Caffrey claimed he could see XXXX was an obvious spiv straight away and that Trafalgar was clearly bad news – so he sent the ginger scammer packing.

    And then STM Group bought out Harbour Pensions and got custody of some of Caffrey’s Blackmore Global Fund worthless crap to keep the Trafalgar Multi Asset Fund worthless crap company.  You couldn’t make it up!  A bunch of toxic rubbish flogged by scammers Phillip Nunn and XXXX XXXX.

    STM Fidecs had notified the hundreds of victims that there would be a distribution in early 2018 once Doran + Minehane had got rid of some of the Dolphin Trust loan notes.  But then STM did a U-turn and announced there wouldn’t be a distribution at all.  Clearly, getting shot of the loan notes was more difficult (or impossible) than Mr Doran first imagined.  Or perhaps he did get rid of them – but got shares in Dolphin Trust or Vordere instead (and this is the reason for the lack of distribution by STM Fidecs).

    Any way you look at it, Dolphin Trust is looking dodgier than ever now it is well known that there are £21 million worth of Trafalgar Multi Asset Fund loan notes out there looking for a warm and cosy (and gullible) home.

    Quite apart from the fact that no self-respecting introducer or financial adviser should EVER be caught selling high-risk, unregulated, non-standard “assets” in the first place, surely nobody would ever want to be caught flogging the same stuff that the likes of XXXX XXXX and Stephen Ward were making a fortune out of.

    I did try to call Dolphin Trust, but they don’t answer their phone.  Maybe they don’t like cold calls (which is how most victims get scammed into lending them money in the first place).

    Pension Life Blog - Trussed by Dolphin Trust? - Dolphin Turust - trafalgar multi asset fundWithout the benefit of any assurances from the nice men at Dolphin Trust – Charles Smethurst, Helmut Freitag, Axel Krechberger and Matthias Ruhl – we will just have to hope that Mr Doran manages to offload the second-hand loan notes that STM Fidecs allowed 400+ victims’ life savings to be invested in.  Perhaps I’ll drop him a friendly note and suggest he tries ebay.

     

  • Blacktower Spain – Qualified and Registered?

    Blacktower Spain – Qualified and Registered?

    Pension Life Blog - Blacktower

    Can Blacktower Spain fare any better than other companies we have looked into? How many of their advisers will come out qualified and registered?

    If you have been following Pension Life´s blogs you will know that we have been conducting a series of investigations into qualified and registered financial advisers in various firms. Today is Blacktower Spain – qualified and registered?

    IFAs and their clients are invited to add to it, correct it, improve it. Here’s a link to the two registers if you want to double check:

    http://www.cii.co.uk/web/app/membersearch/MemberSearch.aspx

    https://www.cisi.org/cisiweb2/cisi-website/join-us/cisi-member-directory

    Please note that this data is correct as of 9am 25/06/2018

    edit: we have been informed that there is a third website we can check for qualifications, so this page is in the process of editing whilst we see if any names appear on the libf members website. 02/07/2018

    https://www.libf.ac.uk/members-and-alumni/sps-and-cpd-register

    Blacktower has several offices in Spain – so let’s see which one is the best.

    Blacktower Spain – Barcelona

    Andy Clelland – International Financial Adviser – not on either CII OR CISI register despite a long list of qualifications – not on libf.ac.uk

    Francisco Mahfuz – Regional Manager Barcelona – Claims CII and CISI but does NOT appear on either register – not on libf.ac.uk

    David Marks – International Financial Adviser – Claims CII – a Mr David Alan Marks  DipPFS appears on the CII register. Also Claims CISI but not on the register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Bernhard Rufli – International Financial Adviser – again a long list of qualifications claimed but alas NOT ON EITHER CII OR CISI REGISTER!– not on libf.ac.uk

    Glenn Stroud – International Financial Adviser – CII registered – not on libf.ac.uk

    Barcelona 1 out of 5! 

    No extra points using the libf register

    *************************************

    Black Tower Spain – Costa Calida

    Keith Littlewood – Regional Manager – Claims a good list of qualifications – does not appear on either register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Paul Price – International Financial Adviser – A Paul Anthony Price DipPFS does appear on the CII register – but it says he is based in Chelmsford – not on libf.ac.uk

    A possible 1 out of 2 – but only possibly!

    No extra points using the libf register

    ************************************

    Blacktower Spain Costa Del Sol

    Kenneth Baek – International Financial Adviser – Not on either register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Richard Black – International Financial Adviser – claims the title FPC – but does not appear on any register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Tim Govaerts – Associate Director – States he IS a CII member but he ISN´T registered

    Patrick Macdonald – International Financial Adviser – claims to be a member of both – DOES NOT appear on either register – not on libf.ac.uk EDIT: Patrick Macdonald is now listed on the CISI membership website.

    Richard Mills – International Financial Adviser – claims qualifications in CII and CISI – but does not appear on either register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Jose Olabarrieta – International Financial Adviser – Not on either register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Chris Pickering – International Financial Adviser – He states he is CISI qualified but he IS NOT on the register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Craig Webb – International Financial Adviser – No claim to qualifications and not on either register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Ian Scholes – International Financial Adviser – Lists that he is CII and he IS CII registered – not on libf.ac.uk

    Quentin Sellar  – International Financial Adviser – Boast a whole host of qualifications and he IS on the CII register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Well done Sellar  and Scholes

    2 out of 10 for the Costa Del Sol!

    No extra points using the libf register

    ************************************

    Blacktower Spain Costa Blanca

    Christina Brady – Associate Director – Claims two qualifications in CISI but does not appear on the register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Wayne Martin – International Financial Adviser – Claims to be a member of both CII and CISI but only appears on the CII register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Dave Diggle – International Financial Adviser – states his expertise is QROPS but he doesn´t appear on either register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Richard Samuels – International Financial Adviser – his areas of expertise are Pension Planning/Transfers but he IS NOT on either register – not on libf.ac.uk

    Graham Dixon – International Financial Adviser – IS CII registered! – not on libf.ac.uk

    Andrew Gibson DipIP – International Financial Adviser – IS CII registered! – not on libf.ac.uk

    2 out of 6 for the Costa Blanca team!

    No extra points using the libf register

    ************************************

    Gibraltar Head office

    John Westwood – Group Managing Director – IS CII registered

    Robert Mancera – Director and General Manager – IS CII registered

    Ally Kerr – Group Director – Claims CII but DOES NOT appear on the register

    Patricia Risso – Non-Executive Director – No claims and not listed on either register

    Paul Rhodes – Associate Director – a Mr Paul John Rhodes Lakin  ACII is listed on the CII register – could this be him?

    Paul Howard – International Financial Adviser – Many Paul Howards are listed on the CII register – let’s hope one of them is him!

    2 out of 6 definitely with a possible 4 out of 6 – not bad Gibraltar! You definitely come out as top office of Blacktower Spain – qualified and registered?

    No extra points using the libf register

    ************************************

    edit: despite the libf register NONE of the Blacktower Spain team appear on it, this means the original score sticks.

    7 out of 29 qualified and registered in the Blacktower Spain office – 75% unqualified and unregistered!

    Pretty poor result Blacktower.

    Pension Life BLog - Blacktower Spain - Qualified and registered?

  • 10 essential questions to ask an IFA

    10 essential questions to ask an IFA

    Most victims of pension and investment scams bitterly regret not having asked more questions with regards to their financial planning.  The problem is that they wouldn’t have known what questions to ask, and they probably wouldn’t have understood the answers even if they had. Pension Life offer you 10 essential questions to ask an IFA so you can ensure you are not the next victim.

    All existing victims wish they had asked questions, obtained assurances, checked advisers’ qualifications and regulation.  But, of course, it is now too late for the victims who have lost part or all of their life savings.

    These victims all agree that it is important to prevent future victims.  This is why we have come up with these 10 essential questions to ask an IFA, when considering financial planning and the transfer of your pension:

    1 – How is the adviser and/or his firm licensed to provide advice to you in the jurisdiction where you – the client – live? Don’t be fobbed off with the answer that the adviser has an insurance license – that isn’t enough.  The adviser needs an investment license.  Also, don’t be fobbed off if the adviser says the firm is licensed in another jurisdiction – it needs to be licensed for where you, the client, live.

    Pension Life Blog - 10 essential questions for an IFA -

    2 – If you are transferring a DB (defined benefit) or FS (final salary) scheme, you must get FCA regulated, qualified, independent advice on the merits of the transfer. Remember, the advice might be that you are better off leaving your pension where it is.

    Pension Life Blog - 10 essential questions for an IFA - Do Nothing - Financial Panning Pension

    3 – Make sure the transfer recommendation (from a DB or FS scheme) is correct. Get a second opinion.  You only get to do this once – and if the wrong road is chosen, it is very difficult (if not impossible) to correct it.

    Check that the transfer advice report makes it clear that you, the client, are being advised on the transfer and that the advice is about what you should do – not what you could do.

    Pension Life Blog - 10 essential questions for an IFA - make sure you choose the right road - Financial Panning Pension

    4 – Don’t let the adviser put you into an insurance bond. Examples of these are Old Mutual International, SEB, Generali, Friends Provident, RL360, Hansard, Investors Trust.  An insurance bond is a wrapper.  A QROPS is a wrapper.  You don’t need two wrappers.  That’s like Superman wearing two pairs of pants over his tights.

    The only purpose an insurance bond serves is to pay the IFA 8% commission.  Plus, the insurance bond will tie you in for between five and ten years, and you neither need nor want to do that with a pension.Pension Life Blog - Pension Life Blog - 10 essential questions for an IFA - Is your adviser qualified - Financial Panning Pension

    Insurance companies will take business from any old unlicensed, unqualified scammers.  They don’t care.  The quarterly charges are called “management charges” but that is very misleading because they don’t do any actual managing.  Once the value of your fund starts to diminish because of the high charges and the toxic, illiquid, high-risk investments, the insurance company will keep taking its fees – sometimes until the whole fund is extinguished and worthless.

    Pension Life Blog - 10 essential questions for an IFA -A QROPS is a wrapper. You don’t need two wrappers - say no to an insurance bond - Financial Panning Pension

    5 – What qualifications does the adviser have?

    Pension Life Blog - Financial Panning Pension

    You wouldn’t take medical advice from an unqualified person posing as a doctor; legal advice from an unqualified person posing as a solicitor or accountancy advice from a person posing as an accountant.  So why take financial adviser from someone with no qualifications?

    It is a sad fact that in many jurisdictions, so-called advisers spring up with no qualifications and even no Financial Panning experience.  Sometimes, they had been selling mortgages, second-hand cars or ice cream the previous week to selling pensions.

    Pension Life covered the question of qualifications in a recent blog by Kim:

    Using advice from Chartered Global about financial qualifications, you can discover that:

    Level 3 Financial Adviser Qualifications

    The most basic or entrance tier is the certificate level which is classed as a level 3 qualification within the UK framework, equivalent to A levels. Level 3 qualifications include:

    • CertCII: Certificate in Financial Planning issued by the Chartered Insurance Institute
    • CertPFS: Certificate in Financial Planning issued by the Personal Finance Society
    • CeFA: Certificate in Financial Advice issued by the Institute of Financial Services
    • Cert IM: Certificate in Investment Management issued by the  Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment

    Level 3 qualifications are sometimes held by adviser office staff and certain mortgage or protection advisers in a bank for example. These certificates require passing a selection of exams over 1-2 years and holders will have a general grounding in financial planning and financial services.

    Level 4 Financial Adviser Qualifications

    However, since 2012 financial advisers in the UK have been required to hold a minimum of a level 4 qualification to be able to continue to provide independent financial planning advice. The minimum required qualification to provide independent financial planning advice in the UK is now the diploma level, a level 4 professional qualification.17125003290_0db81b7bdc_k Pension Life Blog - Qualified Financial Adviser

    Look for the following letters or designations to identify a level 4 adviser:

    • DipCII: Diploma in Financial Planning issued by the CII
    • DipPFS: Diploma in Financial Planning issued by the PFS
    • DipFA: Diploma in Financial Advice issued by the IFS
    • IAD: Investment Advice Diploma issued by the Chartered Institute for Securities & Investment

    Building on the certificate knowledge, level 4 advisers will offer a well-rounded understanding of financial planning and products, from general investments, structured products, to basic pension, protection, tax and savings advice.

    Level 6 Financial Adviser Qualifications

    A full two levels higher are the profession’s top tier of financial advisers; holders of level 6 qualifications equivalent to a bachelor honours degree. Completing a comprehensive suite of professional exams over many years, these top-flight advisers will be designated through one of the following:

    • APFS: Advanced Diploma in Financial Planning issued by the CII
    • CFPCM: Certified Financial Planner
    • Adv DipFA: Advanced Diploma in Financial Advice issued by the IFS

    Advisers at this level will have advanced expertise in the main areas of general financial planning.

     

    6 – Is the adviser planning on investing your life savings in professional-investor-only structured notes? 

    Pension Life Blog - 10 essential questions to ask an IFA - Financial Panning Pension

    Structured notes are complex, risky, expensive derivatives which are only suitable for sophisticated investors who understand them.  Few advisers/brokers understand them – but love them because of the very high commissions they pay.  They also love them because once they have purchased them, there is no management to do – only stand back and watch them plummet in value.

    Examples of structured note providers are Leonteq (currently being sued by Old Mutual International for fraud), Commerzbank, Royal Bank of Canada and Nomura.  There are, of course, many more out there.

    However, if your adviser/broker says he wants to invest part of your life savings in structured notes – ignore any old baloney about “capital protection” – and RUN LIKE HELL!

    7 – Why are the firm’s own in-house funds used? An adviser can’t be independent if he is recommending his own firm’s own funds.

    Pension Life Blog - 10 essential questions for an IFA - Financial Panning Pension

    The way that financial advice is supposed to work is the adviser does a thorough, detailed fact find to analyse the client’s individual circumstances and risk profile.  Then the adviser can go out into the market and find the most suitable and cost-effective investment products.

    There is a huge choice and many good low-cost investment platforms.  But some firms set up their “own” funds – which are merely somebody else’s fund which has been “white labelled” as the firm’s fund.  This means there are two layers of charges.

    An adviser cannot be independent if he is advising that his own fund should be the investment choice.  This recommendation is usually made because of the extra commission which can be earned from an in-house fund, rather than because it is in the client’s best interests.

    8 – Are UCIS funds going to be used?

     Pension Life Blog - 10 essential questions for an IFA - why did you use UCIS - Financial Panning Pension

    Many a poor victim has lived to regret his trust and faith in a silver-tongued adviser’s ability to manage his investments.  UCIS funds (Unregulated, collective investment schemes) are inevitably high risk and can have catastrophic results.

    Such funds include EEA Life Settlements, LM, Harlequin, Brandeaux Student Accommodation, Premier New Earth Recycling, Dolphin Trust and many more which are sometimes no more than Ponzi schemes.  Underlying assets include forestry, “clean” energy, eucalyptus and truffle-tree plantations, chia seeds, fine art, wines and speculative property.

    Life savings have been decimated by failed UCIS funds – make sure your adviser/broker understands you don’t want your money to be invested in any of these toxic, high-risk, unregulated funds.  You could well be promised high returns, but you have to remember that with high returns comes high risk.

    9 – What is the full extent of the charges/fees/commissions on the entire transaction?

    Pension Life Blog - 10 essential questions to ask an IFA - Financial Panning Pension

    So many advisers conceal the full extent of ALL the fees and commissions.  Victims only find out about them long after it is way too late.  The “drag” on a fund can be catastrophic, even without investment losses.

    If you are being advised to go into a QROPS, there will be the set-up and yearly ongoing charge (as well as exit charge); the adviser will charge between 2% and 3% set-up and then 1% (at least) annually; if UCIS funds are used, these can pay up to 25% commission (or even more sometimes); if structured notes are used, these can pay between 6% (for the regular ones) and 8% (for the fraudulent Leonteq ones).  Then there is the 8% on the insurance bond.  Then there is anything else the adviser can slip in without you noticing.

    Victims of poor advice often only notice the dragging effect of all these charges on their fund after a year or so – or more.  And by then it is too late, and the fund can never recover.

    10 – Why were you graded as a “7” balanced investor – or even higher as an “adventurous” investor (when, clearly, you should have been graded as a low-risk investor)?

     

    Pension Life Blog - 10 essential questions for an IFA - 10. Why were you graded as a "7" balanced investor (when, clearly, you should have been graded as a low-risk investor)? - Financial Panning Pension

    Here is the basic problem – the higher an investor’s risk profile is, the riskier the investments can be.  This, of course, means that the riskier the investments are, the more commission the adviser can make.

    After suffering crippling losses, many victims (retrospectively) look at their statements and documentation and find that they were graded as medium or high risk without their knowledge or consent.  The adviser’s excuse is that the client valued growth above all else and that this was reflected in the risk assessment questionnaire.

    Often, clients start off as low to medium risk, and then the adviser surreptitiously increases the risk profile.  This can have catastrophic consequences for investors – and is what ALL of the known victims report as being the cause of their crippling losses.

    The bottom line is that the public needs to be educated and warned about the bad practices offshore.  Only by spreading the word about what happened to existing victims, will future victims be prevented.

    People who have lost part – or all – of their pensions and life savings, are devastated and destroyed.  They are facing potential poverty in retirement.  Some will lose their homes, their health and their relationships.  Some will take their own lives.

     

  • Holborn Assets’ Kensington Fund – Another Trap to Ruin Victims

    Holborn Assets’ Kensington Fund – Another trap to ruin victims.  Why do I say that?  There are many reasons:

    1. Firstly, Holborn Assets should compensate the existing victims of past scams before contemplating moving on to new ones.  There are plenty of Holborn Assets clients facing disastrous losses because of being invested in toxic UCIS funds such as Premier New Earth Recycling and high-risk, professional-investor-only structured notes.  Surely, a firm which is as hopeless as that with investments shouldn’t be allowed anywhere near an investment fund?  Holborn Assets has already proved it doesn’t understand investments and only has the mentality to flog whatever high-risk crap earns the most commission.
    2. Secondly, Holborn Assets’ previous in-house fund, LF Partners, was a dismal performer.  It flat-lined at best, and the high charges ate into what little was left of the investments.  Holborn Assets have demonstrated they have zero expertise in choosing or managing funds.  But what do you expect – they are a shower of ice cream salesmen with few qualifications in financial services, and hardly likely to have any training in investment fund management
    3. The way Holborn Assets encourages their troupe of snake-oil salesmen to recruit as many victims as possible is to encentivise them with “privileges” based on their sales volume.  This includes invitations to the booze and drug-fuelled orgies – such as earlier this year in Tanzania (with an even more depraved version planned for 2019 in Cambodia).
    4. Holborn Assets employs the dregs of the financial services World – mostly unqualified, unprincipled and unscrupulous.  Including Paul Reynolds – banned and fined by the FCA – and Darrin Brownlee-Jones – jailed for killing a motorcyclist – the Holborn Assets staff are a motley crew at best.  A den of thieves at worst.  Even worse, everyone in the firm seems to be happy to stand by and see innocent people’s lives destroyed by Holborn Assets‘ hard-sell tactics, and greedy investment arrangements which disadvantage the investors but pay handsome commissions to the Holborn Assets salesmen.

    Back to the Kensington fund.  I posted an invitation to comment on the fund yesterday on Linkedin – Monday 18th June 2018.  My post has got over 2,300 views in less than 24 hours – and the industry experts are clearly outraged.  The views range from Cape Town to Edinburgh; from Aviva and Brooks Macdonald to Globaleye and Standard Bank Group.

    Some of the comments include:

    “With so many multi-manager, multi-asset funds with demonstrable track records, why would a company chose to recommend a fund that is only weeks old and potentially risk clients money?”

    “High commissions, zero repercussions”

    “Kensington – is being promoted as Holborn Assets’ “flagship” fund whilst sharing the same Director”

    “If you read the instrument of incorporation on the above link and look at “Fees” it suggests the fund can pay 7% up front on a share trade to a range of bodies….”

    “No sign of a prospectus or Kiid document either …. about as transparent as a brick…. avoid”

    The Kensington Fund website doesn’t tell us much about the fund.  It claims to “partner” with Schroders, Rathbones and Marlborough (I wonder if these funds even know!).  It doesn’t tell us who is running the fund or responsible for investment decisions.

    The Kensington Fund was listed on 12.4.2018 – so it is a brand new fund with no information, no history and no performance.  It quotes “virtual” performance by quoting a backtest to try to create the illusion that it can, in the future, perform well.

    There are no details of costs, no fact sheets, no details of who is making the investment decisions.  The directors are Scott Balsdon, Director of Holborn Assets, Globaleye and Adamou Riyad, CCO of Holborn Assets (and Noel Ford).  So the fund is run by the same cowboys who run Holborn Assets – yeehaa!

    So, apart from all the above reasons why Holborn Assets’ Kensington fund should be drowned at birth, is the fact that nobody will just pick up the phone and sort out the mess of the past.  Instead, they just want to go ahead and cause more messes.

    And, finally, Holborn Assets forge five-star Trustpilot reviews.  How sad is that?

    My advice to any potential victims of Holborn Assets’ Kensington fund: remember that by the time you have paid for the ten-year insurance bond and then have 100% of your life savings invested in this dreadful fund, you will have lost 15% of your money.  Avoid Holborn Assets’ Kensington Fund – or, better still, avoid Holborn Assets.

     

     

  • STM Fidecs and the Gibraltar FSC – Evil lives on at the rock

    STM Fidecs and the Gibraltar FSC – Evil lives on at the rock

    Pension Life Blog - STM Fidecs and the Gibraltar FSC - Evil lives on at the rock - STM Fidecs and the Gibraltar FSC – Evil lives on at the rock

    I have read the report about what happened to the scammers at STM Fidecs in the wake of the Gibraltar FSC’s investigation and Deloitte’s so-called “expert report”.

    Frankly, I am stunned.  I have members who are victims of the Trafalgar Multi-Asset Fund and STM Fidecs and they are, understandably, stunned as well.  I have met the people at the Gibraltar FSC and they had seemed decent guys |(but WTF do I know?!).  Maybe they’ve all left, because the people I met appeared enthusiastic and conscientious.  But perhaps they’ve been replaced by a bunch of malfunctioning robots, or ex-scammers or – much worse – ex STM Fidecs employees.

    Pension Life Blog - James Hadley has been investigated for his role in Trafalgar Multi Asset Fund, Capita Oak and Henley Retirement Benefits scams
    Serious Fraud Office investigating XXXX XXXX

    The bottom line is that STM Fidecs scammed hundreds of victims out of their pensions.  STM Fidecs took business from unlicensed scammer XXXX XXXX  of Global Partners Limited (only had an insurance license with Marcus Groombridge’s firm Joseph Oliver) and then invested 100% of the victims’ funds into an illegal UCIS fund – run by XXXX XXXX (now under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office – although I really don’t know what they are playing at because XXXX still isn’t behind bars).

    The rest is history.  The Trafalgar Multi-Asset Fund is being wound up, and after paying the liquidation costs to Stephen Doran, of Doran + Minehane, there is unlikely to be much – if anything – left.  Deloittes spent weeks supposedly investigating STM Fidecs’ books.  I reckon the chumps at Deloittes probably spent most of that time on the golf course with Alan Kentish having a chuckle and a side bet about how feeble the Gibraltar FSC was likely to be.  And, of course, they were right.

    Pension Life Blog - STM Fidecs and the Gibraltar FSC - Evil lives on at the rockNow, of course, Deloittes and STM Fidecs are celebrating, as the GFSC has done nothing to stop this iniquitous, dishonest, incompetent and negligent firm from trading.  Whether STM Fidecs bribed the Gibraltar FSC, or merely got them drunk on the golf course, we will never know.  And it makes no difference.  But certainly the matter has been brusquely brushed under the carpet and the hundreds of ruined lives have been conveniently ignored and forgotten.

     

    Neither STM Fidecs nor the Gibraltar FSC has said a word about redress for the Trafalgar Multi-Asset Fund victims.

    The only words spoken are that the Gibraltar Regulator has told STM Fidecs to “improve its compliance”.  Improve??  How can you improve something that doesn’t even exist at all?  We know that one victim (of scammers Holborn Assets) was bullied by STM Fidecs for trying to improve compliance and harassed for trying to stop obviously non-compliant transactions when she was employed by them.  She was subsequently “paid off” and threatened with a gagging order.

    “STM is now expected to engage with the Gibraltar FSC in order to discuss the Recommendations of the report, and agree a plan of action to implement them.” (according to the report by FT Adviser).  Recommendations?  Where are the sanctions?  Where are the appropriate fines?  Where are the bans to stop Alan Kentish and David Easton from ever practising in financial services again?  Where is the cancellation of STM Fidecs‘ license?

    With this in mind, here are some idiots’ guides as to how to become a pension trustee, and how to become a regulator.  Both are equally easypeasylemonsqueasy – any old idiot or scammer could do it.

    HOW TO BE A PENSION TRUSTEE IN EASY STEPSPension Life Blog - STM Fidecs and the Gibraltar FSC - Evil lives on at the rock

    1. Think of a catchy name: obviously inspired by the acronym STD, Alan Kentish came up with the name STM.  FIDEC is an acronym for “Fighting Infectious Diseases in Emerging Countries”.  Here’s my suggestion: Trussed4U – wadya fink?
    2. Think of a jurisdiction with the most ineffective, pathetic and corrupt regulation – such as Gibraltar
    3. Find an unlicensed scammer like XXXX XXXX who will transfer lots of UK-resident victims into an offshore QROPS and invest their life savings in whatever crap will pay him the highest commissions
    4. Sit back and rake in the profits
    5. Forget fiduciary obligations or anything with the word “trust” in it – only concentrate on the word “trussed
    6. Play golf with the regulator

    HOW TO BE A REGULATOR

    1. Join a golf club (that isn’t too picky about who it lets in)
    2. Give licenses to as many scammers as possible – the more the merrier
    3. Buy lots of blindfolds (to help turn a blind eye to scams and scammers)
    4. Play lots of golf with the scammers and bent pension trustees who facilitate financial crime
    5. When an advisory firm or a trustee firm gets caught scamming, slap a few people on the wrist with a wet fish
    6. Write meaningless reports about robust compliance

    HOW TO BE A SCAMMER

    1. Find yourself a bent jurisdiction (such as Gibraltar)
    2. Find a bent trustee who will accept business from any old unlicensed scammer (such as STD FIDEC)
    3. Find a bent “umbrella” fund which will facilitate financial crime – such as Richard Reinert’s Nascent Fund
    4. Find a Ponzi scheme such as Dolphin Trust which will issue “loan notes” at 10% interest per annum (and up to 25% in introduction commission)
    5. Transfer hundreds of UK residents to a Gibraltar QROPS scam
    6. Get the trustee to agree to invest 100% of 100% of the victims’ retirement savings in … your own fund!

    See how easy it is to be either a trustee, a regulator or a scammer?  But, equally, remember how easy it is to be a victim!

    Quite frankly, Gibraltar should be towed out to sea and sunk.  It is a disgrace to the British nation.  Just give it back to the Spanish and let them clean it up – they would soon kick the likes of STM Fidecs out and stop any further scams and scammers from operating on Spanish soil.  Soil being the operating word.

    Rather than going on about how utterly disgusted I am with the Gibraltar regulator, I will leave it to the eloquent words of one of the STM Fidecs/Trafalgar Multi-Asset victims to put this sickening disgrace into perspective.

    VICTIM: “I have been quietly simmering away but feel I have to release my anger having again read the response from GFSC.

    Firstly, do Gibraltar FSC actually realise over 1,000 individuals and their families are affected by the Trafalgar fiasco, who will potentially all suffer negatively in many different ways during their retirement years?  On a personal level, I should have known better but was caught out by cleverness at a weak moment in my life, but many others I have spoken to had no understanding at all of financial affairs and put all of their trust in the hands of STM and all connected parties due to their apparent convincing knowledge and lies – shocking!!!!!
     
    Due to my own personal research, I know of several other financial institutions who were offered and were involved in discussions regarding Trafalgar.  But due to having correct procedures in place (unlike STM), they clearly ”smelled a rat”, and were far more ”ROBUST” in their approach. The only rat STM smelled was some form of hopeful ”Magic Money Tree” with no concern for its clients’ wellbeing – apart from its own pound note signs.
     
    As you already know I have previously discussed this matter with my local MP and with your permission would like to highlight again the manner in which Gibraltar FSC have dealt with and inadequately reacted to  STM’s performance. STM’s website highlights their glowing history and expertise, but at no point mentions their clearly poor basic audit and compliance mechanisms.
     
    Hopefully, at some point in the future all the evil parties – including STM – in this matter are dragged through the courts, eventually embarrassed and humiliated by the press, and made to pay both financially and personally for their hideous crimes – I can only dream.
     
    Still angry and in despair.
    STM Fidecs/Trafalgar Multi Asset Fund Victim 
     
     
    That victim may well have lost her entire life savings thanks to XXXX XXXX and STM Fidecs.  I am sickened and disgusted with our own onshore regulator’s pathetic failings: the FCA.  But, quite frankly, the Gibraltar FSC makes the FCA look like Superman with TWO pairs of pants on outside their tights!
     

    Pension Life Blog - STM Fidecs and the Gibraltar FSC - Evil lives on at the rockInterestingly, Justin Caffrey – who used to run Harbour Pensions in Malta – told me a year or so ago that he had been approached by XXXX XXXX who wanted to flog his toxic Trafalgar Multi Asset crap.

    Caffrey claimed to have sent XXXX packing with a flea in his ear because he twigged straight away that XXXX was a no-good spiv.  However, he had no such ethics when he invested victims’ pensions in Phillip Nunn’s Blackmore Global crap.

    But now STD FIDEC has bought Harbour and Caffrey has been given the heave-ho.  You couldn’t make it up!