Tag: SIPPS

  • Who cares about Careys and the world of pension scams?

    Who cares about Careys and the world of pension scams?

    Pension scams have been destroying lives for more than a decade.  The scammers cause poverty, marriage breakdowns and even death.  Death caused by stress-related illness.  And death by suicide.

    A typical pension scam involves an unlicensed person pretending to be a financial adviser.  This is illegal.  But it goes on all the time, in the UK and offshore.

    All pension scams result in the loss of part or all of the pension.  And, sometimes, crippling tax liabilities on top.

    Most pension scams start with a pension transfer that should never have happened.  And finish with investments which are unsuitable and risky. 

    One particular pension scam involved an unlicensed introducer called Terence Wright (i.e. a scammer posing as a financial adviser).  Wright ran a business in Spain called CLP (Commercial Land and Property).

    Gerard McMeel QC won the Adams V Carey appeal for lorry driver Russell Adams
    Professor Gerard McMeel QC of Quadrant Chambers

    In 2012, Wright conned hundreds of victims into transferring their pensions into a Carey SIPPS (SIPPS stands for Self Invested Personal Pension Scheme).  The sole purpose for these transfers was to invest the pension funds in assets which paid the highest commissions to Wright and the other scammers involved.

    One of these victims, a lorry driver called Russell Adams, felt so strongly that he had been defrauded, that he took his case to the High Court.  But, in the first round, he lost.  

    Undaunted by his defeat, Mr. Adams came back for round two, and – represented by Gerard McMeel QC – he won.   

    In the landmark High Court appeal ruling, the Adams v Carey case resulted in SIPP provider Carey being ordered to put things right. After the previous judge failed to give Mr. Adams the justice he deserved, a victory was obtained which should help prevent future pension scams.

    In the appeal, the judge – Justice Andrews – ruled that the case involved:

    Lady Justice Andrews in the court of appeal ruled in favour of Russell Adams against Carey Pensions.
    Justice Geraldine Andrews

    “opportunities for unscrupulous entities to target the gullible”

    She ordered Carey Pensions to refund Mr. Adams his pension. She mentioned “financial crime” and placed much of the blame squarely at the door of the unlicensed introducer – Terence Wright of CLP – who gave investment advice illegally.


    The Adams v Carey case is likely to herald a flood of similar claims against pension providers like Carey. So let’s have the drains up on this case – and break down the main ingredients. Then we’ll see what lessons can be learned. And how similar pension scams could be avoided in the future.

    SO HOW DO PENSION SCAMS WORK?

    It all starts with HMRC.

    HMRC SHARK

    A British pension scheme (whether a personal or occupational one) starts with an HMRC registration number. The good, the bad, the ugly – and the downright stinky – pension schemes are all registered by HMRC. And in the case of occupational schemes, by the Pensions Regulator as well.

    HMRC makes no distinction between schemes set up for bona fide reasons, and those which are set up for scamming. HMRC doesn’t care – and anyway they say that consumer protection isn’t their responsibility.

    WHAT IS A PENSION SCHEME?

    A pension scheme is just a wrapper – like a cardboard box or a paper bag. On its own, a pension scheme can’t do any harm. Try looking at an empty cardboard box for a moment and ask yourself how much damage it could do. Watch it carefully – and see if you can spot it doing anything dangerous or sinister. I reckon that however closely you watch it, nothing untoward will happen (although your cat might curl up inside it and take a nap).

    Christine Hallett - CEO of Carey Pensions (now called Options) and her box of dynamite
    Christine Hallett CEO of Carey Pensions

    Remember that it isn’t the box itself that could be dangerous, but the people handling it and
    putting things inside it. An empty box could become a delightful xmas present if filled with mince pies and chocolate. Or, if filled with dynamite and nails, it could become a deadly bomb which could kill and maim hundreds of people.

    Whether a pension scheme is a personal or occupational pension, a SIPP, a SSAS, a QROPS
    or a QNUPS, it is just an empty wrapper. A harmless container which can be used responsibly
    by good people, or recklessly and even maliciously by bad people.

    The lesson is that the cardboard box itself doesn’t do the damage – it is the people who handle it.

    The Adams v Carey case will inevitably be a turning point for the pension industry – both in the UK and offshore.  There will now be a big question mark over the word “self” in the phrase “self invested”.  This phrase may have to be upgraded to “sort of self invested”.  This is because the successful appeal makes it clear there is still a duty by the trustee to make sure nothing happens to pension funds which is clearly bonkers. 

    Mr. Adams was one of 580 Carey SIPP members who were all invested solely in store pods in the space of one year.  And none of them had a licensed financial adviser.  To put this into context, nearly 50 people a month transferred their pensions into a Carey SIPP and voluntarily invested the whole lot in store pods. 

    A reasonable person might ask why Carey didn’t ask themselves why there was this sudden stampede coming out of the blue?  Why so many people wanted to invest their entire pension funds into the same illiquid property asset?  Why so many different people were advised and represented by an unlicensed introducer in Spain?

    Perhaps after the first month, Carey might have raised a bit of an eyebrow.  After the second and third months, Carey’s CEO Christine Hallett might have decided to question whether Terence Wright of CLP in Spain was a suitable person to advise so many different people to invest in the exact same asset. 

    But she didn’t.  She let the torrent of victims of Terence Wright’s unlicensed “advice” continue unchecked.  Hallett is described on her LinkedIn profile as:

    “one of the country’s most knowledgeable experts in the SIPP world and a highly respected leader in the financial services industry”

    FCA warning against Terence Wright of CLP - ignored by Christine Hallett of Carey Pensions

    And yet she didn’t check the FCA website to see whether Terence Wright was legit.  Had she done so, she would have found a clear warning that he was providing financial advice without a license.  And that is a criminal offence.

    Terence Wright was involved in both the pension transfer process and the investment process.  And yet he had no qualifications or license to do either – and there was a clear FCA warning against him

    The ordinary man in the street may routinely check their emails, Facebook and Twitter, but would be unlikely to check the FCA website.  However, a “highly respected leader in the financial services industry” ought to have checked the FCA website as routinely as any normal person would check their social media.

    The Carey “Key Features” document stated that the member was responsible for investment decisions.  And that is where the “self” bit comes from in “Self Invested Personal Pension”.   But Carey also recommended that a suitably-qualified adviser ought to be used – to make sure that the pension transfer was in their best interests.

    There is nothing wrong with having some illiquid commercial property in a pension portfolio.  But the key to all investment decisions is “diversity” and not putting all one’s eggs in one basket (or cardboard box – or indeed pension wrapper).  Had Russell Adams been advised by a proper, qualified, licensed adviser, he would have been warned against investing his whole fund in any one asset.  To put everything into one single investment is always high risk and irresponsible – no matter how solid and safe the asset may be.

    To be fair to Carey, they did eventually sever terms of business with CLP.  But for some extraordinary reason they still acted on CLP’s investment recommendations until eventually deciding they were no longer suitable in April 2013 – nearly a year later. 

    The appeal judgement concluded that the Carey SIPP was recommended by Terence Wright solely for the purpose of investing in the store pods (and the accompanying introducer commissions).  And that all the “advice” given by CLP was part of an inextricably-linked bundle of transactions which included the transfer and the investment.

    This “bundle” of advice consisted of the transfer out of the original pension scheme; the transfer into the Carey SIPP; the investments (in the store pods).  And the whole kit and caboodle was in contravention of article 53 of the FCA regulations. 

    Carey’s own documentation admitted that investments of less than £50k in a Full SIPP were not economically viable.  This should have alerted Carey itself to the fact that many of the 580 people advised by CLP would inevitably suffer from disproportionately high fees.

    The judges in Russel Adams’ case summarised the reasons for allowing the appeal:

    i) Dealing with an unregulated intermediary

    ii) Admitting an asset which could not be valued

    iii) Proceeding with the store pod investment despite concerns in May 2012

    Carey, now called Options, may come back for round 3 if they are given leave to appeal this judgement.  Whether they are allowed to do this or not, this leaves the pension industry with a 100% crystal-clear message:

    DO NOT DEAL WITH UNLICENSED INTRODUCERS

    Most of the things that have gone wrong, in the past decade, are because of advice given by unscrupulous, unqualified, unlicensed “introducers”.  And their mission is clear: to encourage victims to do what earns the introducer the most money – even though it will inevitably cause loss and damage to the victim.

    The pensions industry worldwide must now get behind a coherent and determined campaign to stamp out the scourge of the unlicensed introducer.  Confidence needs to be rebuilt in British and overseas pensions.  And that can only be done by outlawing the rogues and scammers who have done so much damage to so many thousands of victims.

    Terence Wright's luxury mansion paid for by victims' pensions and life savings
    Terence Wright’s luxury mansion in France

    It is, indeed, ironic that Terence Wright of CLP was operating from Spain – the capital of the world of pension and investment scams.  He was able to ruin UK-residents’ lives all the way from the Costa del Sol.  He was given access to a harmless pension wrapper, and managed to transfer hundreds of pensions which should have been left where they were. 

    But the real story is that Terence Wright and his wife Lesley made a fortune out of scamming Russel Adams and hundreds of other victims.  And he is still at it from his new luxury home in France: a stunning mansion in the Dordogne region of France:

    https://www.theolivepress.es/spain-news/2013/04/17/terry-wrights-great-escape-from-spain/

    With his own private plane and stables for his wife Lesley’s collection of horses, he now lives a life of luxury and commutes to Dubai to pursue his lucrative “business” activities.

    Terence Wright and his wife Lesley - enjoying the good life while his victims suffer poverty in retirement
    Terence Wright and his wife Lesley

    This is what is so sad and disgusting about all the scammers behind the many hundreds of pension and investment frauds this past decade or so.  They reap eye-watering rewards. Despite a few limp attempts by the SFO to bring scammers to justice they rarely face jail sentences.

    The pensions industry needs to get behind a solid campaign to bring these criminals to justice.  Lorry driver Russel Adams did his bit to kick this initiative off.  It is now up to the pension providers themselves to take this to the next level. And finally restore confidence in British and overseas pensions.

  • Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds – rogue advisers

    Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds – rogue advisers

    Pension Life Bog - Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds - rogue advisersPension Life blog - Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds - rogue advisersThe Pension Scams Industry Group (PSIG) has carried out a pilot survey on pension scams. The survey has identified seven key findings and concluded that most scams are carried out by rogue advisers and unregulated “introducers”. This is something we write about regularly, so it is great that PSIG has finally caught up.

    Henry Tapper wrote a blog about the survey, ‘Shining light on pension scams.‘ He wrote:

    “Another significant concern was member awareness of advice. PSIG stated, after they found in almost half (49 per cent) of cases, the member had limited understanding or appeared to be unaware who was providing the advice, the fees being charged, or the receiving scheme to which the transfer would be made.”

     

    A lack of understanding of the way the financial industry works is something that the scammers play on.

    Pension Life blog - Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds - rogue advisers

    Many of our blogs here at Pension Life focus on getting information across to the public. You owe it to yourself to understand how the pension system works. This understanding will empower you and your money, protecting it from the scammers. We provide the platform for this information, you just need to read it.

    However, time and time again we find we hit brick walls when sharing information.

    Our blogs are shared on lots of social media networks. I find in many cases – especially on Facebook – that the links to our blogs will get deleted after the admins refuse to approve them. Some readers state that the blogs we write about expat scams are not relevant to expat issues.

    We have been told that our blogs which highlight what questions to ask your adviser are of a commercial and marketing nature. Yet in none of our blogs do we try to sell anything – we just offer knowledge and warnings about how to safeguard your pension.

    When met with this negativity, how do we get the information out there? How do we educate the public?

    Future unaware victims need to know what to look out for and how to avoid a scam. Otherwise, the cycle will continue. The scammers will outsmart the public and they will continue to get rich off the ignorance of the public. And the victims will continue to see their life savings vanish.

    As the saying goes, “ignorance is bliss”. However, if the ignorance leads to you signing your life savings over to a rogue financial adviser – whose only interest is purloining as much of your fund as possible – ignorance is in fact negligence.

    Pension Life blog - Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds - rogue advisersYou may think you can trust a financial adviser, but we live in a world full of scammers and crooks – quite a few of which are financial advisers. Some of them are very greedy and will stop at nothing to fatten their bank balance at your expense. They have no conscience when it comes to living a lavish lifestyle funded from another’s grim fate.

    At school, they teach us about history, geography, maths and more. There is no subject about how to look after your money. Basic education on how to look after our pennies or how to finance our future is not included in the curriculum.

    Knowledge is important when it comes to your finances.

    I can honestly say that before I started this job, I knew very little about pensions and how they work. I simply knew that a pension was something you get when you are ‘old’.

    But ‘old’ comes round too quickly. Whilst working hard, building, saving and living your life. Time flies by.

    It is all too easy for a rogue adviser to contact you out of the blue about a

    “free pension review” and lure you into a scam.

    At Pension Life, we are dedicating our time and words to help educate and inform you about pensions. Our blogs are full of information about scams, what questions to ask when transferring your pension and how to avoid falling victim to a scam.

    Make sure you know what questions to ask your IFA.

    Above all else – safeguard your pension from the scammers.

    Don’t spend your life saving for your future, just to let a rogue adviser snatch it away and spend it on theirs.

    We have put together ten essential standards that we believe every financial adviser and their firm should adhere to. Make sure you read the blog and ensure your financial adviser can meet these standards. If he can´t – find one that can.

     

  • More negligence from trustees Berkeley Burke – Store First

    More negligence from trustees Berkeley Burke – Store First

    Pension Life Blog - More negligence from trustees Berkeley Burke - Store FirstAnother victim of Berkeley Burke SIPPS investments into Store First storage pods has come forward. 55-year-old factory worker Robert McCarthy, of Ebbw Vale, said he has lost more than £30,000 through a Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP). He was duped into the transfer and investment by unregulated firm Jackson Francis which was liquidated in 2014.  His investment may or may not be worthless – depending on whether Store First is wound up later in 2019.

    Robert McCarthy – who is one of 500 Store First investors who used Berkeley Burke as their SIPP provider – made a serious complaint against Berkeley Burke – and spoke to BBC News on the matter.

    McCarthy said:

    “Basically I’ve lost my private pension. Thirteen years of hard work, they’ve taken it, it’s gone.

    I’ll never trust anyone again. And I can’t believe that they can get away with what they’ve done.”

    The BBC has reported Store First as saying that: “In McCarthy’s case, Berkeley Burke failed to instruct Store First on how to manage the pods they purchased as part of a SIPPS. This means that the store pods have stood empty since their purchase. With returns based on rent paid for using the pods purchased, no returns have been made on these empty pods.”

    Pension Life Blog - More negligence from trustees Berkeley Burke - Store First - More negligence from trustees Pension Life Blog Berkeley Burke - Store First

    This scam follows the same path as so many other scams we see: an unregulated advisory firm, Liverpool-based company Jackson Francis, introduced the victims to Berkely Burke and the Store First investment. (Jackson Francis was wound up in 2014). With promises of the investment being ‘the next best thing’ and also guaranteed high returns, 500 people signed their pensions over to the SIPPS provider Berkeley Burke.

    Berkeley Burke then invested the SIPPS into the store pods, but failed to give permission for Store First to rent the pods out on behalf of the investors – meaning they stood empty.  Store First said they were never contracted to manage, advertise or let the storage pods.  That responsibility, they say, lies with the pension trustee, Berkeley Burke.

    This is not the first time Berkeley Burke have been accused of negligence. In the High Court last October, Berkeley Burke was found to have failed to show due diligence in vetting unregulated investments for another client. The company are currently seeking to appeal against the decision. But with a further 14 individuals, based in Wales alone, making complaints against them, there is definitely no smoke without fire.

    Pension Life Blog - More negligence from trustees Berkeley Burke - Store FirstVictims were also invested into the Store First storage pods via Capita Oak registered by HMRC on 23.7.2012 (PSTR 00785484RM) by Stephen Ward of Premier Pension Transfers of 31 Memorial Road, Worsley and Premier Pension Solutions of Moraira, Spain. Victims of this scam were lured in by a chap named XXXX who also sold them Thurlstone liberation “loans”. Victims who took the ‘loan’ now face huge tax bills from HMRC for unauthorised payments.

    Whilst Capita Oak tuned out to be a scam (currently under investigation by the Serious Fraud Office) and victims have lost huge chunks of their pensions, the initial presentation they were given made the scheme look 100% genuine.

    I spend a lot of time sharing our blogs over Facebook into different groups, trying to get the message across about pension scams. Interestingly, many of my posts are met with negative comments.

    Last week in a comment on an expat forum, I was told that my blog about expats being targeted by scammers was “irrelevant”. I have also had comments like: “I would never fall for a scam.” However, there is clear evidence that falling for a scam doesn´t make you stupid or naive – especially when the scammers are so good at disguising their sham schemes as genuine investments.

    Pension Life Blog - More negligence from trustees Berkeley Burke - Store FirstStephen Ward of Premier Pension Solutions, our most prolific pension scammer, was a fully qualified (to the highest level) and registered financial adviser in Spain.  He was also a registered pensions trustee (he has only just been banned as a pension trustee – despite his shady past). Yet Ward has promoted not just the Capita Oak/Store First scam, but also many, many more over a ten-year period. Some of these include Ark, Evergreen (New Zealand) QROPS, Henley Retirement Benefits Scheme, London QuantumElysian Bio Fuels, Continental Wealth Management.

    Therefore, when it comes to the crunch, it is incredibly easy to fall for a pension scam – especially when it is registered by HMRC and promoted by a qualified financial adviser. It is hard to tell the difference between the good guys and the bad guys (who are so good at clever disguises). Pension scam victims include airline pilots, doctors and nurses, teachers, scientists, bankers and even a solicitor or two.   Anyone can fall for a cleverly-sold scam – and they frequently do.

    Toby Whittaker, owner of Store First, as you can see from his Twitter page, is still promoting Group First and Store First as going concerns.  He is also fighting the winding-up petition by the Insolvency Service against Store First.

    Pension Life Blog - More negligence from trustees Berkeley Burke - Store First

    Despite the fact that the Capita Oak scam now lies in the hands of Dalriada Trustees (appointed by the Pensions Regulator) and the ongoing petition to have Store First wound up (purportedly in the “public interest”), Toby Whittaker still stands proud and says he had no idea that his company was being used as part of a scam.

    Over a period of two years, Store First owner Toby Whittaker paid £33m commission to Transeuro Worldwide Holdings Ltd, which funded Jackson Francis.

    No one knows where the money went, but it certainly didn´t go to the victims of this scam. We can bet it lined the pockets of the scamming salesmen who incorrectly invested over 1,000 victims’ pensions into Store First.

    If the UK government succeeds in its petition to wind Store First up, the hundreds of victims will lose all the funds in their pensions.

    The message here is:

    Scams are registered by HMRC – which can make them appear to be official and bona fide.

    Scammers can make their “schemes” appear to be genuine and to offer viable investments.

    Pensions should be invested in low to medium risk, liquid investments.

    Many funds that promise high returns are also high-risk and not safe for your pension fund.

    Know ALL the facts about your investment and what questions to ask.

    Pension liberation scams are now, thankfully, few and far between scammers are busier than ever, so be careful when investing: scammers lurk all over the globe.

    Pension Life Blog - More negligence from trustees Berkeley Burke - Store FirstAlways use a qualified adviser who works for a fully-regulated firm that has the correct investment license – and not just an insurance license.

    So, if it sounds too good to be true – it probably is.

    And finally…

    Cold called and offered a free pension review – JUST HANG UP.

    Safeguard your pension from the scammers.

  • Shaping the future of mis-sold SIPPS

    Shaping the future of mis-sold SIPPS

    Pension Life Blog - Shaping the future of mis-sold SIPPS - Berkeley Burke and Carey Pensions FOSIn January 2019, we saw legal challenges going forward against not one but two SIPPS providers for their roles in using and promoting unregulated investments. Berkeley Burke SIPPS Administration and Carey Pensions (the latter now owned by rogue QROPS trustee firm STM Group).

    Money Marketing has published an interesting article: ´SIPPS providers gear up for landmark court action´. They report that the long-standing dispute between Berkeley Burke Sipp Administration and the FOS should have a decision by summer.

    The FOS claims Berkeley Burke failed to carry out adequate due diligence on a £29,000 unregulated collective investment scheme.

    Berkeley Burke’s lawyers claim the company did not break conduct of business rules. The case has been in dispute since 2014, so a definitive verdict will be eagerly awaited.

    Berkeley Burke claim that if the prosecutions go ahead, it could greatly influence the fees of transferring into future SIPPS schemes.  They also claim that it could prevent clients from transferring into their desired investments. They go on to claim that some providers would not be able to cover these costs.

    Pension Life Blog - Shaping the future of mis-sold SIPPS - Berkeley Burke and Carey Pensions FOSTighter protocols on pension investments are something that we would happily welcome here at Pension Life. With higher standards of compliance and fewer small providers, people investing their pensions into SIPPS should hopefully have a clearer and safer picture.

    With any luck, scammers happily promoting unregulated investments will be a thing of the past. SIPPS providers will become more diligent about the investments they are accepting – meaning they are driven by client satisfaction and responsible investing.  It will also mean they will be canny enough to watch out for investments purely chosen for the fat commissions payable to the advisers/introducers.

    In the case of Carey Pensions, we see a bit of fractional scamming, with the involvement of Spain-based unregulated introducer Commercial Land and Property Brokers advising lorry driver Russell Adams to invest in an illiquid property that paid high commissions. Adams claims Commercial Land and Carey Pensions failed to highlight that the investment was high-risk. Adams alleges that Carey Pensions paid him an inducement fee of £4,000 in February 2012, to “encourage” his investment!

    Investments which are illiquid and high-risk have no place for pension funds – which are retail investments. Investors will find out only after they have invested, that it is difficult to recoup funds and that they will suffer serious losses.

    It is thought that if these determinations are upheld, many other SIPPS providers could be facing legal battles for their negligence in accepting unregulated investments.

    Read More on Berkeley Burke:

    https://www.ftadviser.com/pensions/2018/05/10/berkeley-burke-fos-hearing-scheduled-for-october/

    Berkeley Burke is facing a separate claim from a group of about 77 investors after Judge Russen ruled in February he would allow the group action to be brought in relation to potential mis-selling of high-risk investments in SIPPS.

     

  • Berkeley Burke SLIP with their SIPPS

    Berkeley Burke SLIP with their SIPPS

    Berkeley Burke SIPPS – A SLIP OF THE TICK WITH THE SIPPS

    We talk about the so-called “independent advisers” who sell scams to unwitting victims; we talk about the firms, introducers, cold-callers, lead generators, closers, couriers and transfer administrators.  Many of the Pension Life blogs mention good old Stephen Ward – one of the leading scammers since 2010 – and we often try to make sure XXXX XXXX doesn’t feel left out either.

    However, there is another link in the pension scam chain that is often forgotten about – the trustees. A pension scam always starts with two sets of trustees: the ceding trustee which hands over the funds to the scammers and the receiving trustee which allows the scammers to do their work successfully.

    Ceding trustees have been ticking boxes and handing out thousands of victims’ life savings for years – in complete defiance of warnings by HMRC, the Pensions Regulator and the Scorpion campaign.  It really is too much trouble for ceding trustees to look for the blindingly obvious signs of a scam – and the people these firms employ are obviously not that bright.  Rather than actually doing anything which involves the magic word “trust” (or the four-letter word “work”), it is much easier – and cheaper – just to hand the millions over to the scammers.

    I dread to think how much the lazy, negligent ceding trustees spend on pencils every year for ticking boxes, and blindfolds for making sure the transfer admin staff don’t ever see the scam warnings.  The worst performers are always the same old same old names:

    Aegon, Aon, Aviva, DHL, Friends Provident, Legal & General, Norwich Union, Pearl Assurance, Prudential, Royal London, Royal Mail, Scottish Widows, Standard Life and Zurich.

    Since the Ark and Salmon Enterprises pension scams back in 2010, these lazy box-ticking trustees must have got through thousands of pencils and blindfolds.  In fact, one ceding provider – Nationwide – deliberately handed over a pension even after they had received confirmation that the receiving trustees had been arrested for fraud and money laundering (and were later jailed for eight years).

    However, this blog is written to address the equally damning and disgusting behaviour of negligent trustees who are at the receiving end of a transfer by the scammers – and allow victims’ pension funds to be invested in toxic, high-risk crap which only serves to pay eye-watering commissions to the scammers.  We must remember that if such trustees are negligent, the scammers are able to succeed – and financial crime is inevitably facilitated.

    One such negligent trustee is Berkeley Burke SIPPS Administration Ltd.  At the end of October 2018, Berkeley Burke appeared in the High Court at the behest of the Financial Ombudsman.  The matter involved a complaint by one of their victims: Wayne Charlton – a gardener.  I have never met Mr. Charlton, so know little or nothing about him.  But I have met a few gardeners in my time – and I wouldn’t say that any of them came close to being sophisticated investors.  So I think it is highly unlikely that Mr. Charlton knew anything about investing or had any experience of the highly complex world of investment strategies. 

    In 2011, Mr. Charlton applied to transfer his existing personal pension to Berkeley Burke and to use the money for investment in an investment scheme run by scammers.  Of course, he didn’t know the scheme was a scam at the time – although it was unquestionably a UCIS fund which should not have been promoted to a retail pension saver at all (and Berkeley Burke ought to have known this).  Over 600 other victims were also scammed into investing around £ 12,250,000 in SIPPs operated by Berkeley Burke. However, it transpired that the investment scheme was a scam. And all the money was lost – all because Berkeley Burke was too lazy, selfish, stupid and careless to carry out any basic due diligence.  Not just in respect of Mr. Charlton, but in respect of all the other 600+ victims.

    Full details of the case can be found here.

    There were a few basic warning signs that Berkeley Burke deliberately ignored:

    The core question that was considered in the High Court by Justice Jacobs, was whether Berkeley Burke acted fairly and reasonably by accepting Mr. Charlton’s SIPPS investment into non-existent Cambodian land and Jatropha trees. 

    The judge decided it was blooming obvious that this was an unsuitable investment for a pension fund.  Whilst Berkeley Burke could not give financial advice, they did, however, have a duty of care to their client.  Justice Jacobs concluded that Berkeley Burke “did not act fairly and reasonably” with regards to Mr. Charlton’s investment.  The point was made that they should have questioned the investment and made further investigations into it, and that had they done so they would have deemed that the investment was totally unsuitable.

     

    But of course, it was much easier to go “tick” and let Mr. Charlton and more than 600 other victims lose over £12 million worth of life savings.

    So my motto for pension trustees for 2019 is: Don’t be a Berk or a Burke – put those ticks away!

     

     

     

  • Belgravia Wealth – qualified and registered?

    Belgravia Wealth – qualified and registered?

    Back due to popular demand, qualified and registered company blogs. Today, I am looking into Belgravia Wealth, a Swiss based company. Belgravia Wealth – qualified and registered? Lets see if you are.

    Pension Life Blog - Belgravia Wealth - qualified and registered? belgravia wealth management

    Belgravia Wealth has an impressive list of services offered. However, those who follow our blogs will know that the terms “structured products” and pensions together, makes us shudder with horror. We have seen so many pensions ruined by being invested in high-risk, fixed-term, for-professional- investor-only structured products.

    Whilst I have a queue of trolls telling me that structured notes are “not all that bad”, take a look at this video we created about John Rodgers and the ´blue chip notes´ that destroyed his pension fund. He was a victim of a pension scam courtesy of Continental Wealth Management, which affected around 1,000 members.

    What Belgravia say on their website:

    “Belgravia Wealth Management is a Swiss-established and regulated company founded to fill the advice gap that currently exists between the retail financial companies and the services available to the UHNW clients. As an independent company, we ensure that you benefit from impartial advice and access to offerings from all the financial providers available in the market.”

    It is great to read that Belgravia Wealth is regulated.  Many firms I have written about fail to meet this simple – but essential – requirement. They claim to be independent and suggest that their advice is impartial. I wonder, though, with all this transparency in their blurb – are their staff qualified and registered to give this “impartial” advice?

    Whilst their website offers a tab entitled “Careers”, it does not offer a list of staff that actually work for Belgravia Wealth. So, over to Linkedin to see if Belgravia Wealth staff advertise their employment with the company.

    As with all these blogs, we only go by the information we can find, which is the same information potential clients would be able to access.

    IFAs and their clients are invited to add to this blog, correct it, improve it. We will gladly edit our information if proof of qualification certificates can be supplied. Here’s a link to the three registers if you want to double check for yourself:

    http://www.cii.co.uk/web/app/membersearch/MemberSearch.aspx

    https://www.cisi.org/cisiweb2/cisi-website/join-us/cisi-member-directory

    https://www.libf.ac.uk/members-and-alumni/sps-and-cpd-register – Claim to a DipFA

     

    1. Spencer Freeman-Haynes – Director Zurich and Basel region at Belgravia Wealth Management – claims CISI – DOES not appear on the register
    2. Emmanuel Obi, Jr. LL.M – Head of Compliance – Switzerland at Belgravia Wealth Management – no financial qualifications claimed (but how can he oversee the compliance function if he isn’t qualified?)

    3. Mark Saunders – Regional Manager – Geneva Area, Switzerland – lists various CII qualifications  – DOES NOT appear on the register

    4. Ian Crompton – Director at Belgravia Wealth Management SARL – Claims CISI – DOES NOT appear on the register

    5. Euan Cameron – Belgravia Wealth Management – Basel Area, Switzerland – No financial qualifications claimed

    6. Mystery Man (I do not have access to the profile) – Manager of Business Development – Belgravia Wealth Management – without a name I can not check his qualifications

      Pension Life Blog - Belgravia Wealth - qualified and registered? belgravia wealth management -

    Belgravia Wealth Switzerland has 6 members of staff listed as working for them, and from what I can tell NONE of them are qualified or registered to give financial advice.

    Belgravia Wealth- qualified and registered 0%

     

     

  • Katar Investment Weapons

    Katar Investment Weapons

    Pension Life Blog - Katar Investments

    Katar Investments say they give UK and overseas investment advice in a simple way. However, the types of investment opportunities they are offering are, unfortunately, once again, making my red beacon flash. So, with Déjà vu, let me tell you why. Please make sure you are comfy, this might take a while!

    Firstly, I had a quick look into their team. In my opinion, you would hope that some of the people advertising about giving you advice on investments would hold some sort of financial qualification. However, out of the five team members listed only one mentions a background in finance, the others only list sales experience.

    I had a quick check on the registers to see if the one team member who states she has 10 years´ experience in the financial sector, holds any qualifications with the CII, CISI etc. – she did not appear to have any registered financial qualifications.

    Now, forgive me if I am slightly biased and ever so critical when it comes to firms giving investment advice, but I would hope that any firm giving me advice on what to invest in, would have a team of fully qualified financial advisers. Not just sales experts. Or am I just being fussy?

    Katar Investments state:

    “Whether you are looking for a steady income investment, a property investment with high capital growth and a quick turn around of your capital or an opportunity in the latest emerging market, we have something to offer you.

    We are highly committed to our investors and are focussed (their spelling mistake – not mine) on delivering a level of customer service which is above and beyond. So rest assured our agents will strive to provide you a class A service when you Invest with Katar Investments.”

    I feel that the salespeople who work for Katar Investments may well be driven solely by earning high commissions when it comes to offering class A services. But, again, maybe I am biased! Let’s move on to what investments they offer.

    Pension Life Blog - Katar Investments

    Gatwick – Apart Hotel – This is a serviced apartment/Hotel investment with a minimum investment of 72,500 GBP. The figure states “from”, so I assume you can throw a bit more in for good measure. The promised outcomes:

    • 12 Months rental paid in advance
    • Pension Life Blog - Katar Investments - hotel investmentRental protected by Insurance
    • 5 Years Rental 8%
    • 2% profit paid on exchange deposit during refurbishment
    • 7 days free stay subject to 1 months notice
    • Buy back at 110% after 10 years
    • 40% Finance on units over £140,000
    • Luxury furniture pack included with every purchase
    • Completion date: March 2019

    This is a fixed term investment of 10 years and it has not been built yet (check the completion date). To me, an investment like this would ring alarm bells, as you are purchasing property that has yet to be completed. All sorts of hiccups could occur before the investment was up and running. An illiquid, high-risk investment, only for those who can afford a potential loss on the funds used.

    Office investment in the Kingdon of Fife – Another illiquid and fixed-term investment, although slightly lower in price than the Gatwick offer.

    • Structured exit plan at 10 and 15 years

    This means your money is trapped for an awfully long time. If the market sways, you could be set for a loss and often with fixed-term structured investments there are fees and charges. Investments like this can, if they go wrong, result in you, the investor, falling into negative equity.

    Property investments like these, ring similar to that of the Dolphin Trust´s German property investments – high-risk, unregulated, non-standard “assets”. An awful lot of pension money has been loaned to this company – many DB pensions earned by British Steelworkers were invested here. Introducers saw commissions of up to 25% and in the case of British Steelworkers, Celtic Wealth – who are now in liquidation- were the introducers. The victims do not know where their pension funds are or if they will get any return. Dolphin Trust are still selling their assets, despite the lack of funds being released to mature investors. 

    EIS marijuana opportunity – Grow Biotec, there is a lot of press going around at the moment into the medical uses of marijuana and possibilities of a change in legislation in the UK. In many states of America, the use of marijuana for medical use has been decriminalized. As an avid supporter of natural remedies and healing through nature, the use of CBD extracted from the marijuana plant interests me immensely, the idea of investing in this potentially lifesaving product does have a certain draw.

    Pension Life Blog - Katar Investments - Grow Biotech P.L.C - medical MarijuanaBut, there is always a but! Since working for Pension Life, any investment opportunity that quotes the word ´bio´ gives me the heebie-jeebies. We have only to look back and remember the Elysian Bio Fuels liberation scam promoted by James Hay. The victims of this scam have been left penniless AND with huge tax bills from HMRC.

    Another ´bio´investment disaster was Sustainable Agroenergy (SAE) Plc,  investors were told their investments were in biofuel products, that land was owned in Cambodia and planted with Jatropha trees – a tree with highly toxic fruit that could be used to produce biofuel. Unfortunately, the Jatropa trees were not as fruitful as originally thought. The perpetrators, were thankfully convicted of fraud and bribery offenses.

    The reasons I doubt this as a good investment are the vague promises and the over promises.

    Pension Life Blog - Katar Investments - Grow Biotech P.L.C - medical Marijuana

    ´It is a private offer raising £5 million to develop one of the world’s most valuable portfolios of cannabis-IP assets by 2022.´

    What will be the outcome should this £5 million not be made? A possibility of loss of all or part of your investment.

    ´We are seeking to develop one of the world’s most valuable portfolios of cannabis-IP assets by 2022.´

    Meaning this is a fixed-term investment, with potentially no return for at least 4 years, if not longer, AND only if successful.

    • Projected high returns: Target return of £50 per £1 invested (not guaranteed)
    • EIS Tax relief: up to 50% income tax and capital gains tax relief. Remember tax rules can change and benefits depend on circumstances.

    If it sounds too good to be true – it probably is. Plus this figure is not guaranteed and seems to me like it was just plucked out of the sky, nice and high, to lure investors in.

    Airport Parking Investments,

    These investments are what we in the industry call illiquid. Once your money is in, then it´s pretty hard to get it out quick AND unless the venture does well there will be no return. With regards to pension investments, these are the very worst, toxic assets to invest in.

    Unfortunately, they are often the assets which pay handsome investment introduction commissions to the salesperson, and this is why serial scammers, like Ward, love them. They go in with the ´eco-bio´ sale pitch or the glamorous property ownership – withholding the high-risk, fixed-term rules surrounding the investment.

    A pension fund is a retail investment that should be placed in a low to medium-risk asset. Fixed terms, high-risk and illiquid investments should be avoided at all costs.

    Pension Life Blog - Katar Investments - Grow Biotech P.L.C - medical MarijuanaThe types of investments offered by Katar Investments are high-risk and illiquid, if you have a spare five grand that you can afford to lose, then go for it: have a cheeky punt on Bio Grow. You may be pleasantly surprised and get the target return of £50 per £1 invested (just remember to duck smartly when those pink things with curly tails fly a bit too close!). However, if your money is dear to you and you cannot afford to lose it, please stay away from shiny pink and green investments like this.

    When it comes to your precious pension fund it is always best to air on the side of caution and go for the safe bet. It might not pay the highest interest, however, slow and steady wins the race. Meaning you will be able to enjoy your hard earned pennies in your retirement – stress free.

    John Rodgers wishes he had said no to the offers of Continental Wealth Management.

  • TailorMade International – gets a tailor-made fine reduction

    TailorMade International – gets a tailor-made fine reduction

    Pension Life Blog - unregulated property scheme harlequinVictims of the unregulated property scheme Harlequin, may be disheartened to know that Alistair Burns has escaped with a reduced fine for his role as chief executive of TailorMade International. 

    The FCA originally proposed Burns should face a fine of £233,600, along with a ban back in December 2016. However, the Upper Tribunal, whilst upholding the ban, has chosen to lower this to £60,000.

    FCA executive director of enforcement and market oversight Mark Steward said: “Mr Burns failed to ensure that TailorMade International managed its conflicts of interest, benefiting financially from his role as shareholder and director at an unregulated introducer alongside his regulated role, to the detriment of his customers.”

    Burns co-owned and co-directed the unregulated introducer company operating as ‘TailorMade’. For three years TailorMade provided advice to 1,661 customers transferring them into the unregulated property scheme Harlequin.

    Burns received “significant amounts of commission” from Harlequin for the customers that were advised into the scheme through TailorMade. It was found that pension holders were offered totally unsuitable advice to enter into the SIPPS scheme, which lined Burns´ pockets but saw victims´ funds invested into risky overseas property.

    Pension Life Blog - unregulated property scheme harlequin

    The FCA stated Our action sends a strong message that failing to manage conflicts of interest fairly and disclose them clearly is completely unacceptable.

    To date, compensation totaling more than £55.6m has been paid by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) in relation to claims upheld against TailorMade. This does not cover all the losses suffered by investors, which the FSCS assesses at more than £106.5m.” 

    This is a welcome prosecution in the battle against unregulated pension scammers. However, this does beg the question as to why the Upper Tribunal reduced Burns´fine. It does seem that Burns has got off lightly, given the compensation being paid out by the FSCS and the enormity of his crime.

    Here in the Pension Life office, we believe scammers should be locked up for their crimes and the keys thrown away. A light sentence seems to spell out to scammers that they may get caught but will get off with a slap on the wrist – leaving these criminals free to scam again and again.

  • Victory for SIPPS Pension Scam Victims

    Victory for SIPPS Pension Scam Victims

    Pension Life Blog - Victory for SIPPS pension scam victims A happy tale for the end of the week… not just one but two firms have been told they must compensate clients for poor advice on SIPPS transfers. A great victory against all firms using SIPPS to disguise their ill-advised pension scams sorry schemes.

    Financial Planning today reported that:

    The Financial Ombudsman Service has ruled against Portafina and Greystone Financial Services in two recent separate cases.

    Pension Life Blog - The Financial Ombudsman Service has ruled against Portafina and Greystone Financial Services in two recent separate cases.

    In both instances the clients were advised to invest in unregulated collective investment schemes (UCIS). These schemes are generally high risk and unsuitable for retail investments such as pension fund SIPPS. Both victims have suffered severe financial loss due to the UCIS their funds were invested in.

    Mr P invested sums from his SIPP of £50,000 and two more of £20,000 into various funds before 2007 on the advice of Greystone. In May 2007 Greystone advised Mr P to invest £25,000 of his SIPP funds in the Rock Industrial UK Property fund and to also invest £25,000 in the Phoenix Spree Deutschland fund.

    Mr P at 51 should have been a low risk investor, however he was encouraged to invest a high percentage of his SIPPS into the commercial property market. Greystone argued that the loss was not caused by the advice but by the unprecedented fall in the commercial property market.

    The FOS told the firm it must put Mr P into the position he would probably now be in – or as closely as possible – if he had been given suitable advice.

    With this case and many others now coming to prosecution, there is hope that there will be a reduction in firms advising their clients to invest in unregulated high-risk investments.  In this case there is no mention of the ´fees´the firms applied to the investments they made, however it is safe to assume they would have applied a nice percentage to each investment, ensuring their pockets were well lined whilst the victim´s funds end with severe losses.

     

    **************************************************************

    As always, Pension Life would like to remind you that if you are planning to transfer any pension funds, make sure that you are transferring into a legitimate scheme. To find out how to avoid being scammed, please see our blog:

    What is a pension scam?

    FOLLOW PENSION LIFE ON TWITTER TO KEEP UP WITH ALL THINGS PENSION RELATED, GOOD AND BAD.

     

  • Better Protection Against QROPS Pension Scams from PLIG

    Better Protection Against QROPS Pension Scams from PLIG

    Pension Life Blog - STOP THE SCAMMERS - PLIG launch new code of practice to protect retail investments placed in SIPPS and QROPS - Pension scams

    Here at Pension Life, we are well aware of QROPS and SIPPs providers being a favorite of the serial pension scammers and are very pleased to report that there is positive news of better protection against this, on the horizon.

    Three years ago the Pension Liberation Industry Group (PLIG) launched a code of practice to protect retail investors from serial scammers. Whilst the code of practice managed to help towards the eradication of the big occupational scams, the serial scammers altered their gameplay and continued to score. Serial scammers are focusing on using SIPPS and QROPS providers as a way to lure unsuspecting victims into toxic, high risk investments. Legal “envelopes” with corrupt contents.

    Fortunately, the PLIG has finally recognised this change of tactic and has now announced that it will be updating the code of practice to reflect the new tactics of scammers, with the hope of reducing the number of pension scam victims.

    Pension Life Blogs - James Hay Partnership - Toxic SIPPs Providers - PLIG launched a code of practice to protect victims from poor SIPPS and QROPS pension investments

    Despite this welcome positive news, I still can’t shake the idea that this updated code of practice by PLIG, is possibly too little too late.  The situation with James Hay springs to mind. James Hay – the UK´s largest SIPP provider – has announced losses in 2017. James Hay was also involved in the pension liberation scam with Elysian, in which around 500 clients put £55m into Elysian Bio Fuels. The business failed in 2015.

    The business failed in 2015 after SIPPS – including James Hay – had already been misused to lure in pension scam victims. This is just one of many such scams (off the top of my head).  Believe me, there are many, many more similar to this – that have scammed unsuspecting victims out of millions of pounds’ worth of pension funds and into crippling tax charges.

    Darren Cooke, a chartered financial planner at Derbyshire-based Red Circle Financial Planning, launched a petition to the government to ban cold calling in 2017, argued that it wasn’t new that Qrops had been “a favourite” of pension scammers.

    He was quoted as saying: “The new Qrops legislation that was introduced in the budget [last year] has reduced scams a bit. So, to some extent, revisions are a little behind the curve. I actually think scammers are switching back to using SIPPS and [small self-administered schemes] SSAS again.”

    We welcome this new code from the PLIG, however we can’t agree more with Darren Cooke who also stated, that the FCA needs to regulate the products and not just the advisers.

    “As soon as the FCA [starts] regulating the product, it would stop regulated advisers recommending unregulated products. That would stop 99 per cent of scams.”

    A small step in the right direction, where a huge leap needs to be made.

    Dear FCA,

    If you really want to stop pension scamming in its tracks:Pension Life blogs - Pension life calls for a ban on cold calling to help prevent pension liberation scams and protect victims from poor SIPPS and QROPS investments

    BAN COLD CALLING

    REGULATE THE PRODUCTS

    PROSECUTE THE SERIAL SCAMMERS – ALL OF THEM!

    Many thanks

    Pension Life

    **************************************************************

    As always, Pension Life would like to remind you that if you are planning to transfer any pension funds, make sure that you are transferring into a legitimate scheme. To find out how to avoid being scammed, please see our blog:

    What is a pension scam?

    Follow Pension Life on twitter to keep up with all things pension related, good and bad.

     

     

  • James Hay + Elysian Bio fuel = Pension Liberation Scam

    James Hay + Elysian Bio fuel = Pension Liberation Scam

    Pension Life blog - James Hay Sipps + Elysian bio fuels = pension liberation scam

    James Hay, the first UK SIPPS provider, could face tax charges of up to £20 million from HMRC, related to the Elysian Bio Fuel investment scam (sorry: scheme).  Elysian Bio Fuels, which owned a bioethanol plant in the US and a renewable fuels refinery in the UK, was also used by other SIPPS providers such as Suffolk Life.

    Money Marketing states : “Sipp investors are facing millions in write downs on a high-risk bio fuel investment, which has also been linked to a suspected pension liberation scam.”

    Unsurprisingly, James Hay has launched an appeal against the tax charges AND as of January, has also slipped in a ban on non-standard investments including overseas commercial property, storage pods and carbon credits to be bought through its SIPPS platform.

    We say to James Hay, “too little, too late, mate!”Pension Life blog - James Hay guilty of pension liberation scam

    Through SIPPS provided by James Hay, around 500 clients put £55m in to Elysian Bio Fuels. Yes, that´s 500 retail investors, placed into high-risk toxic investments, totally unsuitable for pensions. The business failed in 2015. James Hay claim that they did not advise their members AND limited their role to pension administration. Whilst they may not have directly advised their members, they did, however, allow crooked advisers to buy shares in Elysian Bio Fuels for the purpose of Pension Liberation.

    Pension Life blog - Beware of toxic investments - James Hay + Elysian Bio Fuels - Pension Liberation Fund

    The sheer act of letting crooked advisers advise their trusting members, whilst turning a blind eye to fraud, makes James Hay guilty in anybody´s book. How long can so called legitimate SIPPS providers continue to get away with this sheer negligence of their members´ funds?

    Below is an email exchange between Stephen Ward of Premier Pension Solutions, his lawyer Alan Fowler and Angela South of Magna Wealth. This thread describes exactly how the Elysian Bio Fuels/James Hay liberation scam worked.

    From: Alan Fowler <fowlerpts@gmail.com>
    Date: 17 October 2013 21:28:21 BST
    To: William Perkins <billperkins62@gmail.com>
    Subject: Fwd: a solution for you !

    Interesting….but I’m amazed that reputable SIPP providers will countenance this.   Who’s making the loans?  I’m not sure I see how the SIPP pays the member (or anyone for that matter) £100k – with what/who’s money?  And won’t the SIPP need to verify that the shares in Xco are actually worth £100k.   That said, if the IFA is doing these, it seems the process works………..

    Regards,  Alan

    **************************************************************************

    From: Stephen Ward <SWard@ppsespana.com>

    Subject: Re: a solution for you !

    Date: 17 October 2013 20:58:15 BST

    To: billperkins <billperkins62@gmail.com>

    Cc: Alan Fowler <fowlerpts@gmail.com>

    The arrangement I heard about today works like this as an example ( ignoring fees) and this is the simplistic version …

    1. Client borrows 16k or thereabouts (this is available in the package)
    2. He gets a non recourse loan (which will not be repaid) of £84k
    3. He buys shares in Xco for £100k.   These are listed on the CISX ( name is Elysium)
    4.   Transfers £100k to James Hay SIPP
    5.   SIPP pays member £100k for the shares .,,,
    6.   Member repays the 16k and trousers £84k

    My IFA connection has done 40 of them so far

    Advice to transfer to the SIPP is from an FCA regulated IFA

    James Hay and Suffolk Life know the full structure and are happy with it ….

    Fees ….. On transfer to SIPP ( need to agree the commercials with the IFA)

    Regards

    Stephen

    **************************************************************************

    From: Stephen Ward [mailto:SWard@ppsespana.com]
    Sent: 18 October 2013 10:01
    To: Angela (South – Magna Wealth)
    Subject: FW: QROPS opportunity
    Importance: High

    Morning Angela

    I was not expecting such a fast green light !

    But it seems to me that a green light is what we have

    The next step is a test case I guess …..   ?      I may have one but just need to check his fund value.

    Putting my provider hat on I do not need to understand the details of the back end engineering,   the fact its OK with James Hay is good enough for me.

    **************************************************************

    As always, Pension Life would like to remind you that if you are planning to transfer any pension funds, make sure that you are transferring into a legitimate scheme. To find out how to avoid being scammed, please see our blog:

    What is a pension scam?

    Follow Pension Life on twitter to keep up with all things pension related, good and bad.