Tag: the pensions regulator

  • Transferring pensions to scammers – the ABC of shame

    Transferring pensions to scammers – the ABC of shame

    HOW DO PENSION SCAMS WORK?

    Every pension scam starts with a negligent transfer.  Ceding providers hand over millions of pounds to pension scammers every year.  Firms – from Aviva to Zurich – ignore warnings by regulators and HMRC.  The providers tick their boxes; the scammers make their millions; the victims are ruined.

    The ceding providers have something significant in common with the scammers.  When we expose some of the scammers, their lawyers swing into action.  I once had letters from Carter Ruck, Mishcon de Reya and DWF land on my desk all in one day.  The scammers’ lawyers bleat loudly about their “poor” clients’ reputations.

    Every pension scam starts with a negligent transfer

    But the ceding providers are just as bad: their lawyers think it is fine to facilitate financial crime.  Here’s an extract from recent letter from one of them:

    “You state you have “hard evidence” that our customers “have suffered serious loss because of our negligence”.  You
    have not provided any such evidence. Please therefore produce such ‘hard evidence’ by return.”

    This lawyer went on to request evidence that the provider ought to have known that the receiving scheme in
    question was a scam.  She went on to state that my allegations were “wholly unfounded” and to demand that I take down this blog:

    PENSION OMBUDSMAN COMPLAINTS AGAINST NEGLIGENT CEDING TRUSTEES

    But this pension provider has given me no reason to take the blog down – and no justification for the claim that the firm is “innocent” of handing over victims’ pensions to obvious scammers.  Back in 2010, the Pensions Regulator warned providers about transferring pension funds to scams:

    “Any administrator who simply ticks a box and allows a transfer post July 2010 is failing in their duty as a trustee and as such are liable to compensate the beneficiary.”

    But the providers have studiously ignored the regulator’s warning for nine years.  And thousands have lost their pensions as a result of this sickening negligence.

    Transferring pensions to scammers

    Here is an “A to Z” of the pensions industry’s negligence in handing over thousands of pensions in defiance of numerous warnings since 2010.  Note: to my knowledge not a single administrator has voluntarily compensated their victims – and all have emphatically denied they did anything wrong.

    Transferring pensions to scammers – the ABC of shame

    Aviva: Second only to Aegon in our list of shame, Aviva transferred numerous pensions from October 2013 onwards.  This was well after the Pensions Regulator’s “Scorpion” warning.  The largest of these was £258,684.05 at the request of well-known scammer Stephen Ward of Premier Pension Solutions.  Ward had been behind the £27 million Ark liberation scam in 2010.  On 21st January 2015, Aviva’s Robert Palmer told me they needed no help or advice with avoiding negligent transfers to obvious scams.  One month later, Aviva handed over £23,500 to the GFS scam.

    British Steel: Long before the much-publicised handing over of multiple members to scammers in 2018, British Steel was handing over pensions to the Hong Kong GFS QROPS scam in 2014 .  Mainly advised by serial scammer David Vilka of Square Mile International Financial Services in the Czech Republic, the GFS scam invested hundreds of victims’ funds in UCIS funds such as Blackmore Global.

    Clerical Medical: Another disgraceful firm with a long history of handing over pensions to Ark, Capita Oak, Westminster and GFS in 2014.

    This A to Z of shame goes on and on – and includes all the big names (who should have known better):

     

     

  • Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds – rogue advisers

    Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds – rogue advisers

    Pension Life Bog - Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds - rogue advisersPension Life blog - Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds - rogue advisersThe Pension Scams Industry Group (PSIG) has carried out a pilot survey on pension scams. The survey has identified seven key findings and concluded that most scams are carried out by rogue advisers and unregulated “introducers”. This is something we write about regularly, so it is great that PSIG has finally caught up.

    Henry Tapper wrote a blog about the survey, ‘Shining light on pension scams.‘ He wrote:

    “Another significant concern was member awareness of advice. PSIG stated, after they found in almost half (49 per cent) of cases, the member had limited understanding or appeared to be unaware who was providing the advice, the fees being charged, or the receiving scheme to which the transfer would be made.”

     

    A lack of understanding of the way the financial industry works is something that the scammers play on.

    Pension Life blog - Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds - rogue advisers

    Many of our blogs here at Pension Life focus on getting information across to the public. You owe it to yourself to understand how the pension system works. This understanding will empower you and your money, protecting it from the scammers. We provide the platform for this information, you just need to read it.

    However, time and time again we find we hit brick walls when sharing information.

    Our blogs are shared on lots of social media networks. I find in many cases – especially on Facebook – that the links to our blogs will get deleted after the admins refuse to approve them. Some readers state that the blogs we write about expat scams are not relevant to expat issues.

    We have been told that our blogs which highlight what questions to ask your adviser are of a commercial and marketing nature. Yet in none of our blogs do we try to sell anything – we just offer knowledge and warnings about how to safeguard your pension.

    When met with this negativity, how do we get the information out there? How do we educate the public?

    Future unaware victims need to know what to look out for and how to avoid a scam. Otherwise, the cycle will continue. The scammers will outsmart the public and they will continue to get rich off the ignorance of the public. And the victims will continue to see their life savings vanish.

    As the saying goes, “ignorance is bliss”. However, if the ignorance leads to you signing your life savings over to a rogue financial adviser – whose only interest is purloining as much of your fund as possible – ignorance is in fact negligence.

    Pension Life blog - Lack of knowledge leads to loss of funds - rogue advisersYou may think you can trust a financial adviser, but we live in a world full of scammers and crooks – quite a few of which are financial advisers. Some of them are very greedy and will stop at nothing to fatten their bank balance at your expense. They have no conscience when it comes to living a lavish lifestyle funded from another’s grim fate.

    At school, they teach us about history, geography, maths and more. There is no subject about how to look after your money. Basic education on how to look after our pennies or how to finance our future is not included in the curriculum.

    Knowledge is important when it comes to your finances.

    I can honestly say that before I started this job, I knew very little about pensions and how they work. I simply knew that a pension was something you get when you are ‘old’.

    But ‘old’ comes round too quickly. Whilst working hard, building, saving and living your life. Time flies by.

    It is all too easy for a rogue adviser to contact you out of the blue about a

    “free pension review” and lure you into a scam.

    At Pension Life, we are dedicating our time and words to help educate and inform you about pensions. Our blogs are full of information about scams, what questions to ask when transferring your pension and how to avoid falling victim to a scam.

    Make sure you know what questions to ask your IFA.

    Above all else – safeguard your pension from the scammers.

    Don’t spend your life saving for your future, just to let a rogue adviser snatch it away and spend it on theirs.

    We have put together ten essential standards that we believe every financial adviser and their firm should adhere to. Make sure you read the blog and ensure your financial adviser can meet these standards. If he can´t – find one that can.

     

  • Store First v Insolvency Service Battle

    Store First v Insolvency Service Battle

    Pension Life Blog - Store First v Insolvency Service - store first scam

    April 2019 sees the battle between Store First and the Insolvency Service.  On April 15th, the High Court proceedings will kick off.  As a result, the Store First v Insolvency Service will determine how many people will lose their pensions permanently.  Two sets of very expensive lawyersDWF and Eversheds Sutherland – will battle it out to see if Store First can continue trading.  In the end, if the Insolvency Service wins the war, then both law firms and an insolvency practitioner will get rich.

    You can read the Insolvency Service’s witness statement here.

    As a result of the Insolvency Service winning, 1,200 pension scam victims will probably lose the majority of their investments in Store First.  In most insolvencies, there is little left after the various snouts in the insolvency trough have had their fill.  Investors will be lucky to get 10p in the pound.  If there’s an “R” in the month.  And if it is snowing.  And if Brexit has a “happy ever after” ending.

    The Insolvency Service says it is “in the public interest” to wind up Store First.   But are they right?  Isn’t winding up the company going to do even more unnecessary damage?

    One very important issue is that the Insolvency Service’s witness statement dated 27.5.2015 (by Leonard Fenton) is so full of inaccuracies, misunderstandings, incomplete facts and an obvious failure to understand how the scam worked – as to be utterly laughable.  The Insolvency Service and the High Court will rely heavily on this witness statement – and yet it has so many holes and errors that it is misleading, incomplete and meaningless.  I asked the Insolvency Service questions about the incorrect and incomplete statements and made numerous comments on the failings contained within the statement.  But the Insolvency Service did not even have the courtesy to reply or even acknowledge my contribution.  In my view, this is arrogance and incompetence in the extreme.

    This impending legal battle (which will cost the taxpayer £millions) is riddled with many more questions than answers.  Here are a couple of my questions:

    QUESTIONS RE STORE FIRST V INSOLVENCY SERVICE BATTLE

    • Why did HMRC and tPR register Capita Oak and Henley Retirement Benefits Scheme as pension schemes in the first place?
    • How many of the many scammers behind Capita Oak and Henley have been prosecuted?
    • Is there an explanation as to why Berkeley Burke and Carey Pensions are still trading?

    The reason for my questions is that both HMRC and tPR were negligent in registering the two occupational pension schemes.  This was because the schemes were obvious scams from the outset.  They both had non-existent sponsoring employers which had never traded or employed anybody.  And they weren’t even in the UK.

    HMRC was blind, stupid and lazy at the start – when these two schemes were registered by known scammers.  But several years later, HMRC woke up pretty smartly and sent out tax demands for the “loans” the victims received.  The Store First v Insolvency Service Battle is probably doomed to ignore HMRC’s negligence in causing this disaster in the first place.

    James Hay and Suffolk Life had been facilitating the Elysian Fuels investment scam at around the same time.  And this was with the considerable “help” of serial scammer Stephen Ward.  So, this was a prime time for scams and scammers.  However, both HMRC and tPR failed the public back then and have continued to do so ever since.

    In 2015, the Insolvency Service identified and interviewed most of the scammers behind the Store First pension scam.  In their witness statement dated 27th May 2015, Insolvency Service Investigator Leonard Fenton cited statements and evidence from all the key players.

    KEY PLAYERS IN THE STORE FIRST PENSION SCAM:

    1. Ben Fox
    2. Stuart Chapman-Clarke
    3. Michael Talbot
    4. Sarah Duffell
    5. Bill Perkins
    6. XXXX XXXX
    7. Alan Fowler
    8. Jason Holmes
    9. Karl Dunlop
    10. Christopher Payne
    11. Keith Ryder
    12. Craig Mason
    13. Patrick McCreesh (of Nunn McCreesh – along with Phillip Nunn)
    14. Tom Biggar
    15. Paul Cooper (Metis Law Solicitors)

    That is fifteen scammers who have never been prosecuted.  They have not only never been brought to justice, but many of them went on to operate further scams and ruin thousands more lives – destroying more £ millions of hard-earned pension funds.

    And what of Toby Whittaker’s Store First?  There is no question that store pods are not suitable investments for pension fund investments.  Car parking spaces are unsuitable for pensions as well.  There are, in fact, a long list of inappropriate investments for pensions – including anything high-risk, illiquid and expensive or commission-laden.

    TYPICAL INVESTMENTS USED BY SCAMMERS:

    All the above are routinely used and abused by pension scammers as “investments” for some dodgy scheme.  Invariably, the above investments come with pension liberation fraud and/or huge introduction commissions and hidden charges.  However, it is rarely the fault of the artist, wine maker, start-up entrepreneur, truffle farmer or property developer that the scammers profit so handsomely from abusing their products.

    Store First v Insolvency Service Battle

    I hope Store First defeats the Insolvency Service in the forthcoming battle in the High Court this month.  And I hope that the public and British government will finally get to see what embarrassingly inept, corrupt, lazy regulators and government agencies we have.  I will publish the Insolvency Service’s witness statement separately for anyone who wants to read the Full Monty.

    Let us not forget that the solicitors acting for the Insolvency Service – DWF LLP – also act for serial scammer Stephen Ward.  It was Ward who was responsible for the pension transfers which subsequently invested in Store First.  Had it not been for him, 1,200 victims’ pensions totaling £120 million wouldn’t now be at risk.  But, somehow, DWF LLP doesn’t think that is a conflict of interest?!?

    Let us be clear: if the Insolvency Service wins the court case, the investors will get nothing.  This will mean that, yet again, the victims will get punished.  If Store First wins, the investors will get at the very least half their money back.  If they are patient, they may even get it all back.

     

     

     

     

     

  • Raising standards – financial advisers and qualifications

    Raising standards – financial advisers and qualifications

    I read an interesting article recently which has prompted this blog, written by Blair duQuesnay, CFA®, CFP® – an investment adviser at Ritholtz Wealth Management, LLC. Blair suggests that the most important change needed in the financial industry is qualifications. Poorly qualified advisers give poor investment advice. Bad investments advice leads to loss of funds.

    Blair has said one thing that underpins all the work we do at Pension Life:

    “The bar to hold oneself out as a financial advisor is low, shockingly low. This is all the more shocking because the stakes are so high. Clients have only one chance to save and invest for retirement. If bad advice leads to the unnecessary loss of capital, there is no time to start over.”

    Read Blair’s piece here:

    http://blairbellecurve.com/substance/?fbclid=IwAR1or8YzCkxUNh_M5-o9e7WngaYJXXV_vjyWI92ZjXEXqG5x9DWzJMA8rgc

    I have written many times in the past about unqualified financial advisers, leading victims blindly into wholly unsuitable investments. These unqualified “snake-oil salesmen” often put most (or sometimes all) of their clients funds into unregulated, toxic, illiquid, no-hoper rubbish which has high commissions for the broker to earn but leave the pension or investment portfolio with an unrecoverable dent.

    If investors are unsure about what qualifications an adviser needs to give advice on investments then please have a read of this blog: “Qualified or not qualified? That is the question”

    Pension Life Blog - Raising standards - financial advisers and qualificationsBlair (pictured) talks about substance and the need for higher standards among financial advisers.  Whilst I love her thoughts, I know how difficult this might be to achieve. We see wholly unqualified scammers posing as fully qualified IFAs time and time again. These scammers are very good at acting the part and the victims have no idea they are dealing with a fraudster – and sometimes go on for years believing they are dealing with a proper financial adviser.

    When accepting financial advice always ask the ‘adviser’ what financial qualifications they have. If it transpires they are not fully qualified to give investment or pension advice – walk away and find someone who is.

    Blair’s words highlight this issue perfectly, stating, “What sort of education, credentials, and work experience do these people have? It depends. You cannot tell which type of firm, business model, or regulatory space in which they operate or if they have the right training and qualifications to give financial advice. One broker is a CFA charterholder, while another down the hall had three weeks of sales training and took the Series 7.”

    Often the best scammers are the ones with the sales training – they know how to push the ‘hard sell’, make the victim think they are ‘missing out’ if they don’t sign straight away. In offshore firms – especially – we see job adverts for new ‘financial advisers’, which state that they are looking for people with sales backgrounds. All too often there is no mention of the necessity of a financial services background, let alone any financial qualifications. Often guys that used to sell cars or holiday apartments will end up selling pension transfers. These are the ones you definitely want to avoid.

    Blair goes on to say, “There’s a common phrase that it takes 10,000 hours to master a skill. Working a 40-hour week with no holidays or vacation, that takes almost five years. I would argue this number is low. I practice ashtanga yoga, a method that adds one new posture when the previous one is mastered. I spent over four years on the same posture. In that daily work of making tiny incremental progress toward the end goal, I overcame fears, corrected weaknesses, and powered through with pure determination. That is substance.”

    Blair highlights that we live in a time of instant gratification and almost laziness in regards to making money. From multi-million-pound Youtubers, rich from being stupid in videos, to big-bottomed rich girls selling their life stories to become famous – it is all about obtaining difficult things easily.

    Twenty-first-century living is driven by the need for wealth and the need for that wealth to be earned FAST!

    These desires are what the scammers use to their advantage.  They tell their victims that their funds will be placed in high-return investments. Investments that will easily add great value to their pension fund, meaning they will be able to have a lavish retirement.

    The thought of possibly doubling your pension fund in just ten years can seem like something of a dream come true. AND, unfortunately, a dream is usually what this is. Placing your funds in supposedly high-return investments – ALWAYS – means taking a high-risk.

    Whilst some high-risk investments do pay off, they are no place for a pension fund – life savings are what people are depending on to keep them in their later years. A pension fund is not a fund to be risked: it should be placed in a broad spectrum of liquid, low-to-medium risk investments. Maybe a small proportion could go into a higher-risk investment but only if the investor’s risk profile says he is comfortable with that degree of risk.  Most people – even high-net-worth clients – don’t want to lose ANY money.

    A trustworthy and fully qualified financial adviser would know this and he would ensure the advice he gives you is in your best interests – not his. The unqualified salesman giving “advice”, will usually opt for the fund that gives the highest commissions.  He can walk away with a fat wallet (probably never to be seen again) and the bleak future of your pension fund is not something he will lose sleep over. But you will, when the high-risk investment in which your entire fund is trapped starts to rapidly lose value.

    If the gentle reader doubts these dire warnings, just look at the facts about investment losses that we highlighted in a recent blog:

    Who killed the pension? Scammers; ceding providers; introducers; HMRC?

    £236,000,000 London Capital & Finance fund (bond), but also:

    £120,000,000 Axiom Legal Financing Fund

    £456,000,000 LM Group of Funds

    £207,000,000 Premier Group of Funds

    £94,000,000 Leonteq structured notes

    Without stating the blooming obvious, that is well over one billion pounds’ worth of AVOIDABLE losses – and still just the tip of the iceberg.

    Blair finishes her article by saying, “We owe it to our future clients to raise the bar. People deserve the reassurance that the person giving investment advice on their life savings has a baseline of knowledge. Until then, clients must continue to do their research on advisors. Look for those who have put in the time to learn their craft and have degrees and credentials to prove it. Often these are not the best salespeople, but at least these advisers have substance behind them.”

    What a lovely finish and what a very important statement. Financial advisers are not salesmen, they are financial advisers. Their work should be conducted in a way that best suits the needs of the individual – each individual, separately. And there is one way and one way only to invest a client’s money: do a proper, thorough, professional risk assessment and then invest strictly in accordance with that the resulting risk profile.

    Slow, steady and fully qualified financial advice always wins the race.

  • Generali – jumping ship to avoid new regulations?

    Generali – jumping ship to avoid new regulations?

    Pension Life Blog - Generali jumping shipThe mis-selling of life assurance policies and long-term savings plans has been a regular topic in our blogs.  Many victims of pension scams see their funds mis-invested into life assurance policies. These life assurance policies do little more than drain the fund value with their expensive fees and costs.

    Generali has for years been aggressively peddling these toxic products.  Interestingly, they have just pulled their contractual savings plans – Vision and Choice – from the UAE market.  Interesting and attractive names for profoundly ugly, expensive and destructive products.

    We have to wonder if all the negative press surrounding Generali’s life assurance bonds has anything to do with it? Since 2016 there has been a huge rise in complaints surrounding the mis-selling of these products. With huge, concealed start-up costs, the funds rarely ever reach their original investment amount, let alone make a gain.

    Furthermore, there has been a third push on regulations to improve how savings, investment and life insurance policies are sold. AND the Spanish insurance regulator (DGS) just confirmed that all such products sold in Spain have been done so illegally But Mr Vitiello of Generali claimed their decision to stop selling the Vision and Choice products in the Emirates was not linked to the new regulations. REALLY?!?!

    Reported by The National. ae, Generali’s Marco Vitiello stated:

    “We will not be accepting any new business applications for our current unit-linked saving products,” said Vitiello – General Manager of Generali’s Dubai branch. “There will be no impact at all to existing clients and contracts. They will continue to be serviced in the same manner as before.”  In other words, they will just keep on losing money, being tied in for an unacceptable length of time and paying extortionate charges.

    This is not the only big change Generali has made this month. The National.ae also reported that:

    “Generali’s decision to stop distributing its contractual savings plans in the UAE came less than a week after the company sold its entire shareholding in its unit, Generali Worldwide Insurance, to the Guernsey-based Utmost Group”

    We wrote about the proposed merger between Generali and Utmost Group back in August 2018.

    Pension Life Blog - Generali - jumping ship to avoid new regulations?

    The Utmost Group now has over £33bn in assets under administration and over 240,000 customers. We can only hope that customers of The Utmost Group will not become victims of mis-sold life assurance policies like the ones of Generali.

    Generali was one of the culprits involved in the huge Continental Wealth Management pension scam, which saw as many as 1,000 victims, invested into high-risk, toxic, professional-investor-only structured notes.

    Whilst the bulk of the victims were placed into OMI bonds, at least 25 (but probably nearer 100) of the victims were placed into Generali bonds by the scammers. The sum total of 25 pension funds invested into these toxic insurance bonds was a whopping £6,314,672. The losses on this amount are calculated to be approximately £3,604,528.

    One victim invested £793,612 and has just £62,703 left! Losing a massive £730,909.

    Another victim invested £142,626 and has lost £90,618! Leaving him with a fund of just £52,028.

    Please note these figures are correct as at 2017/2018, so today’s value is now even lower. Despite the funds’ huge decrease in value, Generali continues to take their fees (based on the original amount deposited – not the current depleted value). Therefore, these amounts will continue to fall AND despite the massive loses be locked in for a fixed term.

    It is, of course, a relief to know that they have decided to stop peddling these toxic, inappropriate bonds to victims. But we can’t help wondering why Generali have suddenly done this and really feel for those already caught up in these bogus “life” policies. Seems to us Generali are jumping ship to avoid the new regulations. With sudden revelations that maybe they should have checked all the details just a little bit more – and declined to take business from unregulated scammers.

    As Generali are busy making changes and sales, we can only hope that compensating the victims of the CWM scam is on their to-do list. As they have sold their entire shareholdings, you might think that an honest firm would want to make right the wrongs they have done.

     

    Not only did Generali allow these 25 victims to be put into wholly inappropriate funds and high-risk structured notes, but these investment instructions were also accepted from unregulated advisers. The scammers were paid high commissions by Generali and there is no sign of any remorse for the huge losses suffered by the victims.

    What we do know is that victims are now preparing their complaints against Generali and CWM. The DGS has found that there is no doubt that the regulations of sale surrounding these products were breached by Generali.

    Generali are not the only life office guilty of financial crimes: Old Mutual International and SEB were even worse – facilitating losses on a massive scale in the Continental Wealth Management case.  OMI bought £94,000,000 worth of ultra-high-risk structured notes for retail investors – resulting in huge losses.  Old Mutual was also heavily involved in more than £1,000,000,000 worth of losses in the Axiom, LM and Premier investment scams.

    Seems it is no accident that “Generali” is an anagram of “Liar Gene”.

     

     

    .

     

  • Pension scammers must be stopped

    Pension scammers must be stopped

    In the Pension Life office, we have been wondering how to get the information about pension scams more widely seen, heard and taken on board. We’d like to ensure the masses are educated and aware that pension scammers can strike from many angles, and with a variety of “deals”. Pension scammers must be stopped and together we can work towards this.

    A quick Google search of the phrase “Pension Scam” shows no end of advice available, so why is this information not being spread to the public more widely and effectively?

    Why was 2017 the WORST year for pension scams?

    Google’s current top-ranking search return for the phrase “pension scam” is How to avoid a pension scam by Pension Wise. This site offers simple and basic information on how to spot a scam and how to report it.

    This is followed by The Pensions Regulator (tPR) which, offers 5-step advice to protect a pension from pension scammers.

    In third place, the Money Advice Service offers information on “How to spot a pension scam”. Money Advice highlight that scammers can be very good at disguising themselves as bona fide, regulated companies.

    Pension scammers must be stopped

    The FCA’s website comes in fourth, with their information on smart scams, advising people to be aware that the offer of a free pension review is often cause for concern and suspicion.

    But, even with all this information out there, 2017 was still the worst year ever for pension scams. It seems that despite changes to regulations, scammers seem to come out on top nine times out of ten. Serial scammers are able to move onward and upward, scam after scam after scam.  Officials, like the regulators, ombudsmen, arbiters and HMRC just stand idly by letting it happen again and again and again.

    Maybe the problem is that the scammers are ever evolving in their behavior and tactics – and the authorities just can’t keep up.  Pension Life came about because of the Ark pension liberation scam. But scamming tactics have moved on considerably.

    We now we have noticeably less liberation and more investment scams where the introducer heads for the investment with the highest commissions, with no regard for the risk or fees that are applied to the fund.

    Pension Life blog - Pension scammers must be stoppedFurthermore, if someone does approach you via a cold call claiming to be a viable company with a convincing sales pitch – how do you know if what they are saying is genuine? How do you know if they are a qualified financial adviser? Unfortunately, in the business of pensions and finance, the sad truth is that you need to: trust slowly; question quickly.

    In the CWM case, victims saw unqualified, unregulated advisers placing low to medium risk investors’ entire funds into high-risk, fixed-term structured notes.

    Fractional scamming is also on the up.  Unqualified, unregulated firms posing as financial advisers act as “introducers” – and often introduce thousands of victims to outright scams. The funds then go through various other parties’ hands to ensure everyone gets their piece of the pie. Each party involved along the chain, creams their bit off the top of the pension fund, until the fund is a fraction of its former self.  This means it will take years to get the pension back to its original state, let alone to start showing a profit.

    Perhaps one of the most iniquitous aspects of pension and investment scams is the routine use of insurance bonds. (a significant part of the fractional scam and an unnecessary second “wrapper”).  The life offices themselves are a big part of the pension scam industry.

    Firms such as OMISEB, RL360 and Generali accept business repeatedly from unlicensed firms and known scammers.  These so-called “life offices” (although they really ought to be called “death offices”) sit back and watch while these scammers gamble away the victims’ life savings on toxic structured notes and high-risk investments. Despite reporting on the inexorable destruction of the funds, firms like Generali et al just keep on taking their fees every quarter – and will sometimes do so until there is nothing left in the fund.

    The best advice we can give, is to ensure you know exactly who you are dealing with and where your money will be going – every penny of it.

    There is no such thing as “free”, and there will ALWAYS be commissions and fees on any pension transfer, legitimate or not. But however much it is – as in REALLY IS – the client needs to know and accept these costs.  Many advisory firms conceal the real costs and the clients only find out what they are when it is too late, and the damage has been done.

    Make sure you have everything in writing AND read it all – at least three times, if not more!

    Make sure you understand everything: the costs, fixed terms, the risk level of investments – and if you don´t, then ask more questions.

    Keep a regular eye on your fund; don´t trust any company 100%; make sure you know exactly what your fund is doing and do not ever be fobbed off with the explanation that any losses are “just paper losses”.

    If in doubt – JUST SAY NO!!

    I am writing a series of blogs about pensions, pension scammers and how to safeguard your pension fund from fraudsters. Please make sure you read as many as possible and ensure you know everything you should about your pension transfer.  You only get one shot at getting it right – if you get it wrong, the damage may never be undone.

    If we can ensure the masses are educated about pension scammers and financial fraud, we can help stop the scammers in their tracks – globally.

  • Pensions Regulator – Light Speed with Gleeson Bessent Trustees

    Pensions Regulator – Light Speed with Gleeson Bessent Trustees

    TPR launches first fraud prosecution

    I am not often left speechless, but in this case all I can say is:

    WOW!

    The Pensions Regulator announced on 11th December 2018 that it is to launch its first fraud case – against Roger Bessent of Gleeson Bessent Trustees in the matter of the Focusplay Retirement Benefit Scheme.

    The details are below, as reported by James Glover, Senior Media Officer of the Pensions Regulator.

    But I am puzzled – I met with tPR’s Andrew Warwick Thompson nearly four years ago.  We discussed various pension scams and fraudsters who were active at the time.  And the delightful Mr. WT told me to buzz off and wind my neck in.  He said that he and his lawyers – who sat either side of him (presumably to keep him from toppling over) had it all under control.  And they didn’t need any help.  Especially from me, thank you.

    At this meeting, we mainly discussed the Capita Oak pension scam – run by XXXX XXXX and administered by Stephen Ward.  And we also talked about the other scams run by the XXXX/Ward dream team at the same time: Westminster and Regent.  The trustee for Westminster was Thames Trustees.  And Roger Bessent was the director of Thames Trustee – and he took over from ME!

    The background to this was that XXXX XXXX had appointed a lady in Dubai, Maria Orolfo of Europe Emirates Group – run by Adrian Oton – as director of two trustee firms: Imperial Trustees and Thames Trustees.  These were the trustees for the Capita Oak and Westminster scams respectively.  Orolfo had realised with horror she was the trustee for these scams and resigned – leaving the pension scheme members exposed to the danger of unauthorised payment charges if there was no trustee.

    So I became a director of both companies – Imperial and Thames.  I was removed pretty quickly by the scammers to prevent me from obtaining evidence against them.  I was replaced by a butcher called Roger Chant in Imperial, and an accountant called Roger Bessant in Thames.  Hard to say which of them was worse, to be honest.

    Anyway, the Serious Fraud Office did – eventually – wake up and start to investigate XXXX XXXX and both schemes: Capita Oak and Westminster.  This was announced in May 2017.  And now, more than 18 months later, tPR announces it is going to investigate Roger Bessent.

    I am very glad that Tinky Winky and tPR don’t do much rushing around – the last thing we want to see is a load of dizzy Teletubbies!  I just hope the trail hasn’t gone too cold in the past four years.

    Issued: Tuesday 11 December 2018

    An accountant is to appear in court charged with fraud and making employer-related investments – the first time The Pensions Regulator (TPR) has prosecuted for these offences.Roger Bessent is accused of abusing his position as the director of Gleeson Bessent Trustees Ltd, a professional pension scheme trustee, to transfer more than £200,000 of pension scheme funds into his bank account and those of companies controlled by him.The funds were transferred from the Focusplay Retirement Benefit Scheme, the sponsoring employer of which was Gleeson Bessent (Accountants and Business Advisers) Ltd where Mr Bessent was a director.Mr Bessent, 66, whose business is based at Navigation Business Village, Navigation Way, Ashton on Ribble, Preston, Lancashire, faces five counts of fraud by abuse of position and five counts of making employer related investments.He has been summonsed to appear at Preston Magistrates’ Court on 30 January 2019.

     

    Editors’ notes

    1. Fraud by abuse of position is an offence under Section 1(2)(c) of the Fraud Act 2006. It carries a maximum sentence of 10 years’ imprisonment.
    2. Making a prohibited employer-related investment is an offence under Section 40(5) of the Pensions Act 1995. It carries a maximum sentence of two years’ imprisonment.
    3. TPR is the regulator of work-based pension schemes in the UK. Our statutory objectives are: to protect members’ benefits; to reduce the risk of calls on the Pension Protection Fund (PPF); to promote, and to improve understanding of, the good administration of work-based pension schemes; to maximise employer compliance with automatic enrolment duties; and to minimise any adverse impact on the sustainable growth of an employer (in relation to the exercise of TPR’s functions under Part 3 of the Pensions Act 2004 only).
     
  • FCA launches new ScamSmart campaign

    FCA launches new ScamSmart campaign

    Pension Life Blog - ScamSmart campaign - scamsmartHere at Pension Life, we are constantly trying to raise awareness about pension scams. The Financial Conduct Authority – FCA – has also been busy. Pairing up with the Pensions Regulator – tPR – they have published the ScamSmart campaign with the slogan – Be ScamSmart with your pension.

    With the ScamSmart campaign, they have also made a video and published it on YouTube. Here is the video for you to watch:

    Whilst I think it is great that they are publishing videos as part of the ScamSmart campaign, I can´t help but feel that they spent a large chunk of their budget on some bloke whizzing around on a jet ski.

    The video does highlight what people need to look out for to be ScamSmart, but the repeated flashes back to the jet skier whooping loudly are, in my opinion, very distracting. I feel they deviate from the message they are trying to get across.

    Pension Life Blog - ScamSmart campaign - scamsmartI would like to highlight that the rider of the jet ski does bear a remarkable resemblance to Phillip Nunn, cold caller and “fund manager” of the Blackmore Global investment scam. Blackmore Global was promoted by David Vilka of Square Mile InternationalDavid Vilka´s firm is not regulated to provide pensions and investment advice. However, he has never been prosecuted by the FCA for his involvement in this scam.

    Phillip Nunn´s lawyers, Slater and Gordon, threatened Angie with defamation proceedings for exposing Nunn’s scamtivities. The video made by Pension Life in response to this reveals three serial scammers, two of which are still free to scam, while the other one: Peter Moat of Fast Pensions  (who has had legal proceeding filed against him) is nowhere to be seen.

    However, the FCA has done nothing to stop these scammers, nor other well-known ones and no prosecutions have been made. Whilst we are fully in support of educating the masses worldwide to ensure consumers can avoid falling victim to pension scams, this does beg the question:

    Pension Life Blog - Pension Life Blog - ScamSmart campaign - scamsmart

    WHY ARE THE FCA DOING NOTHING ABOUT THE KNOWN SCAMMERS?!?

    If the industry was to put a stop to the masterminds, (like Stephen Ward), then surely that would be a giant leap in the right direction for deterring new-comers. As it stands, however, the “award-winning” scammers just seem to set a precedent. If you are good at what you do, your scams can be pushed under the carpet and you can live a life of luxury on the hard-earned cash of the scam victims, escaping punishment.

  • Square Mile International Financial Services – qualified and registered?

    Square Mile International Financial Services – qualified and registered?

    This week, in my mission to disclose advisory firms´ claims to qualifications (or in fact the lack of them),  I am looking into Square Mile International Financial Services – qualified and registered?

    What the Square Mile website page says:

    Pension Life Blog - Square Mile International Financial Services - qualified and registered? David Vilka Square Mile

    Despite referring to their Prague headquarters in a lovely paragraph:

    “Square Mile has a dedicated customer care and administrative team based in our headquarters in the beautiful historic Old Town quarter of Prague, in the Czech Republic. Aside from picturesque surroundings, being in the very heart of Europe allows our customer services team to easily service our clients all over Europe, as well as placing us within 90 mins of London’s own ‘Square Mile’ where we have our UK team, and extensive links and partnerships with some of the worlds top financial institutions.”

    …their website fails to list their team members, so over to Linkedin to see who the lucky people are.

    But, firstly, a bit of background information about Square Mile, just in case you haven´t heard of them.

    Pension Life Blog - Square Mile International Financial Services - qualified and registered? David Vilka Square Mile

    Square Mile International in Prague is run by David Vilka, a name that has been the star of several other Pension Life blogs. Vilka is linked to the Blackmore Global Investment Fund scam which saw victims’ pensions invested in dodgy AND illegal (for UK residents) UCIS funds. It should also be noted that David Vilka of Square Mile International Financial – was not regulated to give investment advice, but did so anyway.

    Vilka transferred at least 65 pensions into a Hong Kong QROPS and then invested them into the Blackmore Global fund, courtesy of Phillip Nunn and Patrick McCreesh of Aspinal Chase. Blackmore Global is an unregulated fund, which has never had an independent audit. Investors fear their pension funds may well be lost, as there is no evidence as to where the money has gone. David Vilka has showed no shame for what he did, and has made no attempt to recover any remainder of his victims´pensions.

    So, Square Mile International Financial Services – qualified and registered?

    IFAs and their clients are invited to add to this blog, correct it or improve it. Here’s a link to the three registers if you want to double check:

    http://www.cii.co.uk/web/app/membersearch/MemberSearch.aspx

    https://www.cisi.org/cisiweb2/cisi-website/join-us/cisi-member-directory

    https://www.libf.ac.uk/members-and-alumni/sps-and-cpd-register – Claim to a DipFA

    Please note that this data is correct as of 29/08/2018.

    Staff list for Square Mile International Prague office:

    1. David Vilka – Managing Director – DOES NOT APPEAR ON ANY REGISTER – but we knew that already!
    2. Alan West – Head of Client Services –  DOES NOT APPEAR ON ANY REGISTER

    Well, the Square Mile International Prague offices´ dedicated customer care and administrative team´ doesn´t inspire much confidence. Only two staff members are listed – one of them is known to be linked to pension scams – and neither has any financial qualifications!

    Square Mile International Financial Services – qualified and registered? 0%

    On a final note, this is the statement made on the Square Mile  retirement solutions section of their webpage:

    ´PENSION SCAMS & LIBERATION: BE AWARE– No properly authorised scheme should be able to offer benefits to you before age 55 – any scheme offering this facility or any adviser claiming to be able to do this is almost certainly involved in pension liberation. A bonafide scheme, whether UK or International, will be listed on the HMRC website. There is much sensationalism written about pension scams. The truth is that there are many more very good investments opportunities and very few scams in comparison. Good investments don’t sell newspapers so inevitably the few rotten apples make the headlines. Simple steps such as: checking your adviser is regulated in an EEA jurisdiction and is correctly passported into your jurisdiction, checking the levels of remuneration the adviser will receive, checking the lock-in clauses with the investment scheme and any penalties, and confirming directly with any professional advisers, auditors, or lawyers named on the investment of their involvement.  Despite what is written an alternative or esoteric investment as part of a portfolio can reap very good rewards if proper research is undertaken.´

    Pension Life Blog - Square Mile International Financial Services - qualified and registered? David Vilka Square MileInterestingly, David Vilka (pictured here with John Ferguson, who was also involved in the Blackmore Global scam) is not regulated to give financial advice on pensions or investments, but did so anyway. The Blackmore Global scam victims are locked into a toxic investment fund, that should not have been sold to them as UK residents. Furthermore, they face penalties if they wish to withdraw the little they have left in the fund, as they are locked in for 10 years. No move has been made by any of the perpetrators to help these victims.

    Square Mile International should be placed at arm´s length by anyone who wants a secure future for their pension fund.

  • Trustees Must Block Transfers to Pension Scams

    Trustees Must Block Transfers to Pension Scams

    Pension Life Blog - Trustees Must Block Transfers to Pension Scams - ceding pension trustees - Trustees have the power to block pension transfers if they suspect a scam – they must use it!  Now the Ombudsman has upheld a complaint against the Police trustee, there is hope for further justice against negligent pension trustees.

    In the Royal London v Hughes case, Royal London suspected an attempted transfer was destined to go into a scam and blocked it.  The member, Ms Hughes, complained to the Pensions Ombudsman – but he did not uphold her complaint.  He said that Royal London was quite right to block the transfer.  But Ms Hughes appealed the matter to the High Court and the judge overturned the Ombudsman’s determination.

    The industry was, naturally, appalled.  But this matter left many questions unanswered:

    • Why was a singing teacher so desperate to transfer her £8,000 pension and have it invested in Cape Verde property? (Had she developed a passion for collapsible flats?)
    • Where did she get the many thousands of pounds it must have cost her to have a barrister represent her in the High Court?  (Considerably more than eight thousand quid I reckon).
    • How come the mighty Fenner Moeran QC (for Royal London) got so soundly defeated by a public access barrister?  (Was his sharp stick a bit blunt that day?)
    • What happened to the several hundred people queuing up behind Ms Hughes to have their pensions invested in Cape Verde flats?  (“Flat” being the operative word).

    I could ask loads more pertinent and searching questions – like why did Ms Hughes’ public access barrister, Frances Ratcliffe of Radcliffe Chambers, think it was a good use of her considerable skills to defend an obvious pension scam?  How drunk was the judge on the day?  How many more people got scammed out of their pensions because of this abomination – and proof the law is not just an ass but a whole donkey farm?

    Anyway, enough already.  The damage was done in the Royal London v Hughes case.  And now, hopefully, the door to justice has been opened in the Police Authority v Mr N case – as eloquently reported by Henry Tapper in his blog on 2.8.18.  But there is a great deal more work to be done on this now: the scammers who organised and promoted the London Quantum scam need to be prosecuted and jailed; and the FCA-regulated firm – Gerard Associates – which gave the advice to the police officer (Mr N) needs to be sanctioned by the FCA.  Gerard Associates – run by Stephen Ward’s associate Gary Barlow – also needs to refund the £5k they charged Mr N – and indeed all of the £220k they charged the 98 London Quantum victims.

    Now is the time to bring to justice not only the pension scammers, but also the negligent ceding pension trustees who allowed the scammers to succeed – and facilitated financial crime.

    At the time Mr N was scammed by Stephen Ward; Viva Costa International (the “introducers”); and FCA-regulated advisers Gerard Associates, the Pensions Regulator’s “Scorpion” campaign was in full flow.  But it was unbelievably inept.  It only really talked about liberation and ignored the many other kinds of fraud being perpetrated at the time – i.e. investment fraud.

    The London Quantum pension scam came hard on the heels of the Capita Oak and Henley scams – which straddled the Scorpion watershed of February 2013.  The transfer administration for Capita Oak was done by Stephen Ward of Premier Pension Solutions (Spain) and Premier Pension Transfers (Worsley, Manchester).  Ward knew from first-hand experience how ceding trustees were starting – albeit agonisingly slowly and gradually – to resist transfer requests.

    Here is evidence of the first tentative – and very inconsistent – moves to do some long-overdue diligence on pension transfer requests – as reported by Stephen Ward’s team of transfer administration scammers:

    24.4.2013 – ReAssure Pensions – “The scheme now want the client’s application and new-dated screenshot emailed to Alan (Fowler – Ward’s pension lawyer chum) – on hold at Tom’s (Biggar – XXXX XXXX’s mate) request”.

    11.4.2013 – Prudential – “Transfer canceled as per XXXX (XXXX XXXX’s wife)”

    26.4.2013 – Zurich – “Unwilling to process – not sure why – need to cancel”

    11.7.2013 – Zurich – “On hold as there may be an issue with Scorpion”

    26.4.2013 – Friends Life – “Awaiting trust scheme rules – with Anthony (Salih – Ward’s mate) – need to cancel”

    30.5.2013 – Aviva, NHS, Co-op, Friends Life – “Schemes are refusing to transfer”

    11.6.2013 – Scottish Life – “Scheme contacting client – believed not transferring”

    However, during this same period, there were plenty of transfers being made in defiance or ignorance of Scorpion.  These included ceding schemes NHS (£43k), Scottish Widows (£25k), LGPS Newham (£47k), Aviva (£54k), Xerox £92k, Zurich (£21k), Prudential (£25k) and Standard Life (£53k).

    But the most worrying was the Firefighters Pension Scheme: £69K after the following notes were made:

    “Advised that the trustees committee are meeting to discuss cases and we are awaiting a call back next week.  Transfer sent today 2.7.13 and paid on 16.8.13.  Statement sent to XXXX  and Tom (Biggar)”. 

    So the Firefighters were no better than the Police Authority in terms of ignoring the Scorpion warning.

    And here is what the Scorpion warning was saying from 2013 onwards – and, indeed, was still saying in 2016 when the last couple of hundred Continental Wealth Management victims were in the process of being scammed:

    Pension Life Blog - Trustees Must Block Transfers to Pension Scams - ceding pension trustees - Predators Stalk Your Pension

    Companies are singling out savers like you and claiming that they can help you cash in your pension early.  If you agree to this you could face a tax bill of more than half your pension savings.

    Don’t let your pension become prey.

    Pension loans or cash incentives are being used alongside misleading information to entice savers as the number of pension scams increases.  This activity is known as ‘pension liberation fraud’ and it’s on the increase in the UK.

    In rare cases – such as terminal illness – it is possible to access funds before age 55 from your current pension scheme.  But for the majority, promises of early cash will be bogus and are likely to result in serious tax consequences.

    What to watch out for?

    1. Being approached out of the blue, over the phone or via text message
    2. Pushy advisers or ‘introducers’ who offer upfront cash incentives
    3. Companies that offer a ‘loan’, ‘savings advance’ or cash back’ from your pension
    4. Not being informed about the potential tax consequences

    Five steps to avoid becoming a victim

    1. Never give out financial or personal information to a cold caller
    2. Find out about the company’s background through information online. Any financial advisers should be registered with the FCA
    3. Ask for a statement showing how your pension will be paid at retirement and question who will look after your money until then
    4. Speak to an adviser that is not associated with the proposal you’ve received, for unbiased advice
    5. Never be rushed into agreeing to a pension transfer

    If you think you may have been made an offer, contact Action Fraud.

    But, the Scorpion warning failed tragically in so many different ways:

    • The warning only talked about liberation.  Many victims thought this warning didn’t apply to them as they had no intention of liberating their pension fund
    • No information was given on how to find out about a company’s background – and how to establish whether it was regulated
    • The warning talked about advisers being FCA regulated – but ignored the question of offshore advisers who obviously wouldn’t be FCA regulated
    • The public was advised to contact Action Fraud – but did not disclose that Action Fraud would do absolutely nothing

    Pension Life Blog - Trustees Must Block Transfers to Pension Scams - ceding pension trustees - In 2015, we went to see the Pensions Regulator to talk about the failings of the Scorpion campaign – as well as the failings of the Regulator.  Two Ark victims and I met the then Executive Director for Regulatory Policy – Tinky Winky.  Our intention was to explain to him how the Scorpion campaign had failed and how it needed to be made more robust and comprehensive.

    Tinky Winky, flanked by two lawyers and a paralegal, told us to “hop it” – and warned us that if we tried to interfere with the authority of the powers of the regulator, our arse would be grass and he’d be a lawnmower.  A year later the Scorpion warning had still not been updated or improved and hundreds more victims lost their life savings.

    The Pensions Ombudsman is, naturally, the hero of the hour in the Mr N v Police Authority case.  And hopefully, he will find for the rest of the victims if they all now bring complaints against their negligent ceding trustees in the London Quantum case.  But we must remember that, contrary to what the Ombudsman’s service has said for the past few years, the industry did know about pension scams long before the Scorpion Campaign in February 2013.

    In fact, a clear warning had been given in 2010.  The Pensions Regulator had been fully aware that since 1999 pension scams were on the increase, and yet did not make it clear to ceding pension trustees what their statutory obligations were in respect of transferring victims into scams. On 13.7.2010, tPR Chair David Norgrove stated that: “Any administrator who simply ticks a box and allows the transfer, post July 2010, is failing in their duty as a trustee and as such are liable to compensate the beneficiary.” 

    But pension trustees claim they never read that message (let alone heeded it) and that it was neither publicised nor distributed.  Further, in the same year Tony King, the Pensions Ombudsman, reported that he had “found that pension trustees failed in carrying out serious fiduciary responsibilities to others in circumstances in which the law specifically states that they should not be protected from liability.”  And still tPR did nothing.  And the Pension Schemes Act 1993 was not amended to reflect the urgent need to protect the public.

    The Pensions Regulator’s predecessor – OPRA (Occupational Pensions Regulatory Authority) had warned about the dangers of pension scams years before 2013 – as had HMRC.  The last thing I want to do is criticise the Ombudsman – as this must be his hour of glory and we must all be hugely grateful to him.  Especially Mr N and his fellow London Quantum victims.  But we must remember that the industry in general, and pension trustees in particular, should have been alert to pension scams long before Scorpion.

    Now is the time to bring to justice not only the pension scammers, but also the negligent ceding pension trustees who allowed the scammers to succeed – and facilitated financial crime.

     

     

     

     

  • TV licence enforcement versus unlicensed advisers

    TV licence enforcement versus unlicensed advisers

     

    Pension Life Blog - Ann Smith

    Pension Life campaigns for awareness of corrupt financial advisers and advisory firms operating without the correct licences. Outing theses advisers and firms, in the hope that the authorities will do something about the state of it all, is one way of bringing these scammers to justice and warning the public. A recent article in the Irish News about an unpaid TV licence caught my eye. I feel I must highlight the injustice of the fact that a disabled woman was prosecuted for not having a TV licence while dozens of serial pension scammers get away with scamming their victims out of their hard-earned pension funds daily without ever getting punished.

    Pension Life Blog - TV licence enforcement - unlicensed advisers
    Grandmother Anne Smith (left) from Poleglass with her friend and neighbour Marie Flynn. Picture by Mal McCann

    IN reports –

    Ill grandmother sent to jail for not paying TV licence fines

    As we reside in Spain, we are fortunate enough not to have to pay for this licence, but readers who live in the UK and Ireland (and I believe Germany) will be well aware of the fees one MUST pay if they have a television in their home. For those that don’t live in a jurisdiction that requires a TV licence, here´s what Wikipedia states about an Irish TV licence:

    In Ireland, a television licence is required for any address at which there is a television set. Since 2016, the annual licence fee is €160. Revenue is collected by An Post, the Irish postal service. The bulk of the fee is used to fund Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ), the state broadcaster.

    Television licensing in the Republic of Ireland – Wikipedia

    Irish police found time to visit Anne Smith (59 – who suffers from the debilitating lung condition COPD, as well as osteoporosis and is waiting for a double hip replacement, several times to issue a warrant for her arrest and later to take her into custody. Anne’s TV licence had been left unpaid for quite some time due to her poor health.

    Pension Life Blog - TV licence enforcement - unlicensed advisersNon payment of a TV licence (when a television set is used within a house) is a criminal offence, and non-payment results in a police warrant being issued. Furthermore, men with vans are employed to visit all households on their database that do not pay their TV licence and basically harass them into proving they do not have a TV.  It is just assumed that anyone without a TV licence is guilty, and so a campaign of harassment begins by letters and visits to intimidate people into buying a licence.

    The Journal.ie reported earlier this year that there had been a rise in the purchase of TV licences in Ireland by * 8,000:

    ‘In a bid to clamp down on those who do not have a licence, the minister rolled out a raft of measures, including a communications campaign, as well issuing a new tender for a new TV licence agent tasked with carrying out TV licence inspections.

    Pension Life Blog - TV licence enforcement - unlicensed advisersA spokesperson for the department said their research shows that the public campaign gave a definite push in the number of TV licences purchased. One tagline used in the ads where it highlights that buying a TV licence “is the law” resulted in a definite spike in take-up rates, they added.’

    Can you imagine if this much effort was put into ensuring that financial advisers were fully licensed and qualified? And if the police chased after all the pension scammers? In my opinion, it is far more important to ensure that the financial services industry is operating in a fully legal and licensed manner. However, it is not so and the priority is obviously TV licence defaulters rather than pension scammers.

    Serial pension scammers manage to create scam after scam after scam, posing as licensed advisers – convincing victims that they work for regulated firms – these scammers con millions out of innocent, hard-working victims every year!

     

    And the problem is that the authorities, the FCA, HMRC and even the police just sit idly by and let the unlicensed advisers scam time and time AND TIME AGAIN!

  • CWM Pension scam – A victim’s reconstruction

    CWM Pension scam – A victim’s reconstruction

    Pension Life Blog - CWM Pension scam – A victims reconstruction - CWM pension scam - Stogsdill sold John Rogers selling blue chip notesJohn Rodges had a pension pot of £202,000.  He was cold called by a salesman called Dean Stogsdill and persuaded to transfer his pension fund to a QROPS (Qualifying Recognised Overseas Pension Scheme) with Continental Wealth Management (CWM pension scam using high-risk, professional-investor-only structured notes which Stogsdill referred to as “Blue Chip Notes”).

    With false promises of greater flexibility, better growth and a 25% tax-free cash lump sum, the transfer seemed like a good opportunity. In reality, it was an offer too good to be true –  it was a pension scam-  in which the CWM salesmen, Dean Stogsdill and Anthony Downs would reap high commissions.  The victims – like John Rogers – would be left with heavy losses.

    67 year old John Rodgers, a former research and development chemist, had a collection of occupational and private pensions in the UK.  As he had moved to Spain 11 years previously, he had the opportunity of consolidating his pension into a QROPS.

    Stogsdill – Chief Executive of CWM, assured John Rodgers that he had been evaluated as a low-medium risk investor, and that the costs would be 1.75% a year over a period of five years – or 1.5% for ten years. This would be based on the original value of the investment, so the promised growth of 8% would not incur any further costs. He was also promised that life assurance would be ‘thrown in’. Unfortunately, John was to become the next victim of the CWM pension scam.

    Pension Life Blog - CWM Pension scam – A victims reconstruction - CWM pension scam - Stogsdill sold John Rogers selling blue chip notes

    What actually happened was John Rodger’s pension fund was invested into a selection of high-risk structured notes from Royal Bank of Canada – “Blue Chip Notes”.  John was told that these “Blue Chip Notes”, were capital protected inside a life bond which would give him life assurance. No real explanation of what a structured note actually was, was given to John.

    Structured notes are generally high-risk, FOR PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. Therefore, these “Blue Chip Notes” had no place in a pension fund. This investment strategy was part of the CWM pension scam – earning salesmen like Stogsdill big bucks while destroying innocent victims’ pension funds.

    Stogsdill also failed to disclose the commissions they were going to earn from the life assurance bond and the “Blue Chip Notes” so even before John’s funds were placed in the toxic high-risk investements – they had incurred a significant loss.

    It took just two years for John’s fund to plummet to half of its original value. However, CWM assured him that it was just a “paper loss”, and that the fund would go back up at maturity.

    However, CWM went ‘bust’ before the fund could mature.  togsdill and all the other salesmen did a runner!

    Today John’s pension fund is worth just £60,000 (if he is lucky).

    Pension Life has reconstructed John’s story and we would like to share it, in the hope that other people can spot the signs of a pension scam like CWM and avoid falling victim to the scammers – the only ones who profit from investments like these.

    It is estimated that up to 1,000 people fell victim to the CWM pension scam and that around 40 million pounds was lost to these high-risk, toxic investments with providers such as

    Royal Bank of Canada, Nomura Commerzbank and Leonteq.

    The CWM pension scam was promoted by unqualified, unregulated salesmen posing as financial advisers. People who were not legally allowed to provide this kind of financial advice. The scam was promoted with outright lies and undisclosed fees and costs.

    Pension Life blog - CWM pension scam - Stephen Ward Trustee for Pension Scams - uses advisers like Stogsdill to do his dirty work in selling blue chip notes to John Rodgers
    Stephen Ward of Premier Pension Solutions

    A financial adviser that can be linked to not just the CWM pension scam, but also many others including Ark,  is a man called STEPHEN WARD (pictured).  He IS fully qualified AND registered with the CII.  However, he does not have a conscience when it comes to destroying hard-earned pension funds – check out another of Pension Life’s videos:

    Pension Scams – Stephen Ward

    If the name Stephen Ward appears on any pension transfer you are offered, make sure you say no and walk away – Pete and Val – another couple who were victims of the CWM pension scam – wish they had.

    When considering transferring your pension fund, please make sure you check all the facts and fully understand all of the costs. Ensure your pension is going into a suitable retail investment – not a structured note.

    Kim – a member of the Pension Life team is writing a series of blogs about pensions and we would love it if everyone would read and share these. Let’s stop pension scammers in their tracks worldwide by educating the masses on pension rules and regulations.

    What is a pension scam?